RESUMO
Background and Purpose: Studies assessing the costs of the immunobiological cold chain (CC) are scarce. Therefore, the factors that influence the allocation of resources in this process are not known. The objective of this study is to determine the cost of the immunobiological CC. Methods: The Health Economic Assessment study was carried out in Minas Gerais, Brazil, between 2021 and 2022. The unit of analysis was the municipal level of the CC. The perspective of the Public Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde) was considered as a funder, the year 2021 was considered as the time frame, and the period of 1 year was considered as the time horizon of the analysis. Direct medical, nonmedical, and indirect costs were included. A mixed technique was used involving micro- and macrocosting and sensitivity analysis to identify the influence of the main categories on the final cost. Results: The total cost was USD 20,014,545, with nonmedical direct costs being the most representative (61.24%). Human resources were the most influential items, representing 76.43% of the total cost. Conclusions: The most influential items should be those of greatest concern and planned by managers to make the CC more efficient.
RESUMO
Objective: Assess and classify the risks of bias in the clinical trials (CTs) that make up the technical notes (TNs) referring to direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) requests. Methods: The TNs related to the DOAC requests of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban were selected on the e-NatJus website and, after excluding duplicate references, an analysis of the CT used for their writing was carried out. The CT risk of bias (low, high, or uncertain bias) was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and the results were added to Review Manager 5.4. Results: 181 TNs were selected, 236 articles were analyzed and after applying the inclusion criteria, 28 CTs were analyzed in full. None of the CTs were free of bias. Most CTs, 71% (20/28), had a low risk of bias regarding attrition bias and reporting bias. In contrast, 61% (17/28) of the studies did not control for selection, performance, and detection bias, as they present uncertainties and a high risk of bias. In addition, it was observed that 21% (6/28) of the CTs had a high risk of bias for conflict of interest. Conclusion: The biases present in the CT cited as a reference for the TN referring to the DOAC request are significant and compromise their quality (AU).
Objetivo: Avaliar e classificar os riscos de vieses dos ensaios clínicos (EC) que compõem as NTs referentes à solicitação dos DOAC. Métodos: As NTs relacionadas à solicitação dos DOAC apixabana, dabigatrana, edoxabana e rivaroxabana foram selecionadas no website e-NatJus e, após exclusão das referências duplicadas, foi realizada uma análise dos EC utilizados para a redação das mesmas. O risco de viés dos EC (baixo, alto ou viés incerto) foi avaliado utilizando a ferramenta Cochrane Risk of Bias e os resultados foram adicionados no Review Manager 5.4. Resultados: Foram selecionadas 181 NTs, analisados 236 artigos e após aplicação dos critérios de inclusão, resultou em 28 EC analisados na íntegra. Nenhum dos EC ficou isento de viés. A maioria dos EC, 71% (20/28), apresentou baixo risco de viés em relação ao viés de atrito e viés de relato. Por outro lado, 61% (17/28) dos estudos não controlaram o viés de seleção, performance e detecção, uma vez que apresentam incertezas e alto risco de viés. Além disso, foi observado que 21% (6/28) dos EC apresentaram alto risco de viés para conflito de interesses. Conclusão: Os vieses presentes nos EC citados como referência das NT referentes a solicitação dos DOAC são significativos e comprometem a sua qualidade (AU).
Assuntos
Viés , Ensaio Clínico , Judicialização da Saúde , AnticoagulantesRESUMO
Abstract In Brazil, insulin analogs stand out as one of the most demanded medications by judicial means. However, the guarantee of judicial access does not guarantee rational use. In context, pharmacotherapeutic follow-up (PF) is shown to be clinical effective strategy for patients with diabetes. To evaluate direct medical costs one year after performing PF in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using insulin analogs ordered by court in Public Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS). This is a partial economic analysis, nested within a quasi-experimental study. Patients with T1DM who receive insulin analogs by judicialization in a medium-sized Brazilian city participated. The PF was conducted following the method adapted from the Pharmacotherapy workup (PW). Data were collected considering the period of one year before the start of the intervention and one year after the start of the intervention. Direct medical costs were evaluated and the difference in costs was calculated. 28 patients participated in the intervention. After PF, direct costs were -$3,696.78. Sensitivity analysis showed that there is a 33.4 % chance for PF to present cost savings when compared to baseline. The PF has the potential to reduce direct medical costs from the perspective of the SUS.
RESUMO
Objetivos: contribuir para a geração de dados de avaliação econômica de estratégias de empoderamento farmacoterapêutico para pacientes com Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 (DM tipo 2). Métodos: este estudo farmacoeconômico é aninhado a um ensaio clínico com controle não randomizado que incluiu pacientes ≥18 anos de idade, cadastrados no HIPERDIA. Os pacientes foram alocados em um modelo de Markov conforme valores de hemoglobina glicada do acompanhamento. As probabilidades do surgimento de complicações relativas ao DM, incluindo-se óbito, foram estimadas por dez anos. Cada complicação do DM tipo 2 teve seu custo estabelecido para determinação do custo anual. Resultados: entre os participantes da intervenção, não ocorrem óbitos ocasionados por DM tipo 2, e a progressão de complicações mantém-se estável durante os anos simulados, enquanto, no grupo controle, 60% dos pacientes podem evoluir para óbito nos dez anos, e a probabilidade de serem acometidos por complicações relacionadas ao DM tipo 2 é crescente. Com relação aos custos, ao final de dez anos, os pacientes que participaram da Estratégia Individual de Empoderamento Farmacoterapêutico (EIEF) tiveram um custo médio de UU$134,45 poupando a vida de 100% dos pacientes, e os pacientes do atendimento convencional um custo médio de UU$237,12 e 40% dos pacientes acompanhados chegariam ao final do ciclo com vida. Conclusão: a EIEF parece ser uma alternativa economicamente viável em longo prazo, bem como para a promoção do controle glicêmico.
Objectives: contribute to the data generation for the economic evaluation of pharmacotherapeutic empowerment strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (type 2 DM). Method: This pharmacoeconomic study is nested in a clinical trial with non-randomized control that included patients ≥18 years old, registered in HIPERDIA. The patients were allocated to a Markov model according to the follow-up glycated hemoglobin values. The probabilities of the appearance of complications related to DM, including death, have been estimated for ten years. Each complication of type 2 DM had its cost established to determine the annual cost. Results: Among the participants in the intervention, there are no deaths caused by type 2 DM, and the progression of complications remains stable during the simulated years, whereas in the control group, 60% of the patients can progress to death in ten years and the probability of being affected by complications related to type 2 DM is increasing. Regarding costs, at the end of ten years, patients who participated in Individual Pharmacotherapeutic Empowerment Strategy (IPES) had an average cost of US$ 134.45, saving 100% of patient's lives, and conventional care patients cost an average of US$ 237.12 and 40% of the patients followed would reach the end of the life cycle. Conclusion: The IPES seems like an economically viable and long-term economic alternative and promotes glycemic control.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Empoderamento , Controle GlicêmicoRESUMO
Fundamentos: A judicialização da saúde no Brasil gera aumento anual significativo das demandas por recursos financei-ros. Em 2016, com intuito de promover uma comunicação entre o sistema jurídico e o sistema de saúde, implementaram o sistema e-NatJus (Núcleos de Apoio Técnico do Poder Judiciário). A função do e-NatJus é fornecer apoio técnico aos juízes nas questões relativas à saúde por meio da elaboração de Notas Técnicas (NT). Objetivo: Analisar o perfil e a qualidade das NT de solicitação de anticoagulantes orais diretos (DOACs) disponíveis no portal eletrônico do e-NatJus para consultas por juízes. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo documental descritivo, em que foram avaliadas as características sociodemo-gráficas, do diagnóstico e tratamento dos pacientes, bem como informações sobre as evidências da eficácia e segurança da tecnologia e conclusão de todas as NT referentes à solicitação de DOACs obtidas na plataforma e-NatJus desde sua im-plantação em 2018 até junho de 2020. Resultados: Foram incluídas no estudo 181 NT: rivaroxabana (67,0%), apixabana (16,0%), dabigatrana (12,0%) e edoxabana (5,0%). A média de idade dos indivíduos foi de 65,7 (±15,1) anos, sendo, (50,3%) do sexo feminino. São Sebastião do Paraíso foi o município que mais solicitou apoio nas NT (5,0%), e o estado com mais solicitações foi Santa Catarina (34,8%). Em relação ao diagnóstico dos pacientes, os mais prevalentes foram fibrilação atrial (FA)(31,5%) e troembolismo venoso (TEV)(16,4%). Aproximadamente 86 NT estavam com conteúdo semelhante no item evidência científica. Observou-se que (57,5%) tiveram a conclusão não favorável para disponibilizar o medicamento solicitado. Dentre as 77 NT que tiveram a conclusão favorável, (57,1%) não avaliaram as recomendações da Comissão Na-cional de Incorporação de Tecnologias (CONITEC). Conclusão: De forma geral, nosso estudo permitiu conhecer o perfil das NT e os principais motivos de solicitações dos DOACs, com intuito de compreender melhor se são realizadas realmente de forma consciente e responsável. A população que solicitou os DOACs via judicial é uma população idosa e não houve grande diferença entre os sexos. Os diagnósticos mais prevalentes nas NT foram FA e TEV corroborando com a indicação desses medicamentos. Pode-se observar que a maioria das NT que concedeu parecer favorável não evidenciou consulta à CONITEC e não apresentou evidência científica que contemplava de forma concreta sua decisão (AU)
Background: The judicialization of health in Brazil generates an annual increase in demands for financial resources. In 2016, to promote communication between the legal system and the health system, the implementation of e-NatJus system (Technical Support Centers of the Judiciary). The role of e-NatJus is to provide technical support to judges on health-related issues through the preparation of Technical Notes (NT). Objective: Analyze the profile and quality of TNs requesting Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) available on the e-NatJus electronic portal for consultation by judges. Methods: This is a descriptive documentary study, which evaluated the sociodemographic characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of patients, as well as information on the evidence of the efficacy and safety of technology and the conclusion of all NT related to the request for DOACs obtained in the e-NatJus platform since its implementation in 2018 to June 24, 2020. Results: The study included 181 NT: rivaroxaban (67,0%), apixaban (16,0%), dabigatran (12,0%), and edoxaban (5,0%). The mean age of the individuals was 65.7 (±15.1) years, being (50,3%) female. São Sebastião do Paraíso was the municipality that most requested support in the NT (5,0%), and the state with the most requests was Santa Catarina (34,8%). Regarding the diagnosis, the most prevalent patients were AF (31,5%) and VTE (16,4%). Approximately 86 NT had similar content in the scientific evidence item. It was observed that (57,5%) had an unfavorable conclusion about making the requested drug available. Among the 77 NT that had a favorable conclusion, (57,1%) did not evaluate the rec-ommendations of the National Commission for the Incorporation of Technologies (CONITEC). Conclusion: In general, our study is effective to know the profile of the NT and the main reasons for consulting DOACs, to better understand the form of knowledge and the DOACs. It can be observed that most NTs granted a favorable opinion, did not evidence CONITEC and did not present scientific evidence that contemplated the concrete form of their decision (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Varfarina/uso terapêutico , Recursos Financeiros em Saúde , Inibidores do Fator XaRESUMO
Background Surgical site infections account for 14-17% of all healthcare-associated infections. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) are complementary strategies developed to optimize the use of antimicrobials. Aim to evaluate the effectiveness of AMS in promoting adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis protocols in hospitalized patients, reducing surgical site infection rate and cost-benefit ratio. Method This systematic review of randomized clinical trials, non-randomized clinical trials and before and after studies was performed using Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov, in addition to reference lists of included studies. The risk of bias of studies was measured by the ROBINS-I checklist and the quality of the evidence synthesis by GRADE. Results Fourteen before and after design studies were included. In 85.7% of the studies, AMS was effective in increasing adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis protocols and in 28.5%, there was reduction in surgical site infection rate. Three studies evaluated cost-benefit ratio and found a favorable impact. Eight (57%) studies were at risk of moderate bias and six had severe bias. The evaluation of the synthesis of evidence showed quality ranging from low to very low. Conclusion AMS, such as audit, feedback, education, implementation of a protocol, and a computer-assisted decision support methodology, appear to be effective in promoting adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis protocols, reducing surgical site infection rate with a positive economic impact. However, more studies, particularly randomized clinical trials, are needed to improve the level of evidence of available information on AMS in order to favor decision-making.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Humanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Abstract The hospital pharmacy needs a constant process of evaluation and monitoring of its activities. In Brazil, several agencies establish tasks and duties for pharmacists, but little is known about the compliance and the perception of the professional regarding these policies. The present study aims to characterize the pharmacist's perception of Brazilian hospital pharmacy policies according to the Basel Statements. A search was performed for the contacts of all medium and high complexity hospitals in the country. Subsequently, a questionnaire elaborated following the Basel Statements was sent by e-mail to hospital pharmacists throughout the country. The domain analyzed was "Human Resources, Training, and Development". Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0. Pharmacists representing a total of 111 hospitals from all Brazilian regions answered the survey questionnaire and showed that more than half of the hospital pharmacists perceive themselves as not complying, whether in the service of local, national, or pharmaceutical education. Besides updating the professionals in relation to national policies, it is necessary that the representative bodies of the pharmaceutical class be more present in the elaboration and evaluation of the policies directed to human resources, seeking uniformity and the possibility of carrying out the activities required.
Assuntos
Farmacêuticos/classificação , Farmácia/instrumentação , Educação em Farmácia/ética , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Inquéritos e Questionários/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the frequency, profile, and additional variables associated with the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) to older adults in primary care, and evaluate physicians' knowledge about these medications. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted based on data from patient records for the period of January 2014 to December 2017 in a city located in the state of Minas Gerais. The frequency of PIM use was evaluated based on the 2019 Beers-Fick criteria. Physician knowledge was evaluated using a validated questionnaire as a primary data source. RESULTS: In a sample of 423 older adults, 75.89% (n = 321) used at least one PIM, the most common of which were medications used to treat central nervous system disorders (48.00%; n = 203). Most participants were female (62.41%; n = 264) and 70 years or older (69.50%; n = 294). When presented with clinical cases illustrating common situations in the management of older patients, 53.33% of physicians (n = 8) answered four or five questions correctly out of a possible seven; 13.33% (n = 2) answered six questions correctly; and 33.33% (n = 5) obtained three correct answers or fewer. CONCLUSIONS: These findings showed a high frequency of PIM use among older adults treated in Primary Health Care settings, with medications used in the treatment of central nervous system disorders. Our results highlight the importance of continuing education for health professionals and improved assessments of the medication available in the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde; SUS) for use in older adults, especially those taking multiple medications.
OBJETIVOS: Analisar a frequência, o perfil e os fatores associados à prescrição de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPI) aos idosos na Atenção Primária à Saúde, além de avaliar o conhecimento dos médicos sobre esses medicamentos. METODOLOGIA: Trata-se de um estudo transversal, cujas informações foram coletadas de prontuários dos pacientes, referentes ao período de janeiro de 2014 a dezembro de 2017, em um município localizado no estado de Minas Gerais. Para análise da frequência de uso de MPI, utilizou-se o critério Beers-Fick de 2019. Para avaliação do conhecimento médico, utilizou-se uma fonte primária de informação, um questionário validado. RESULTADOS: Dos 423 idosos, 75,89% (n=321) utilizavam pelo menos um MPI e a classe mais utilizada foi do sistema nervoso central (48,00%; n=203). Houve maior prevalência no sexo feminino (62,41%; n=264) e em idosos com idade ≥70 anos (69,50%; n=294). Em relação aos casos clínicos apresentados para avaliar o conhecimento dos médicos referentes às situações comuns no cuidado à saúde do idoso, 53,33% (n=8) acertaram quatro ou cinco questões das sete existentes, enquanto 13,33% (n=2) responderam corretamente a seis perguntas e 33,33% (n=5) obtiveram três ou menos acertos. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados evidenciaram alta taxa de prescrição de MPI entre os idosos da Atenção Primária à Saúde, destacando-se os medicamentos que são destinados ao tratamento de doenças do sistema nervoso central. Ressalta-se a importância da educação continuada desses profissionais de saúde e a melhor avaliação de medicamentos incorporados ao Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e destinados à população geriátrica, sobretudo o idoso polimedicado.
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Assistência a Idosos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Competência Clínica , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Objetivo: Analisar o preço real de aquisição de medicamentos anunciados como promessas terapêuticas para tratamento da COVID-19 no Brasil. Métodos: Identificaram-se os medicamentos que estão sendo estudados e/ou noticiados como promissores e, posteriormente, analisaram-se os custos de aquisição desses medicamentos por uma drogaria do interior do estado de Minas Gerais, entre janeiro e junho de 2020. Resultados: Sete (87,5%) medicamentos apresentaram aumento do valor de compra no período estudado. Dexametasona e ivermectina apresentaram elevação de mais de 200% no preço. A menor elevação foi o polivitamínico, 5,44%. A hidroxicloroquina foi o único medicamento (12,5%) que não sofreu variação no preço e só foi adquirida nos três primeiros meses do ano de 2020. Conclusão: O preço de aquisição da maioria dos medicamentos anunciados como "promessas terapêuticas" para tratamento da Covid-19 no Brasil sofreu aumento significativo no período da pandemia.
Objective: To analyze the real purchase price of drugs announced as therapeutic promises for the treatment of Coronavirus disease in Brazil. Methods: The drugs that are being studied and/or announced as promising were identified and, subsequently, the costs of purchasing these drugs by a drugstore in the countryside of the state of Minas Gerais were analyzed between January and June 2020. Results: A total of seven (87.5%) drugs showed an increase in the purchase price in the period studied. Dexamethasone and ivermectin showed an increase of more than 200% in price. The lowest increase was the multivitamin, 5.44%. Hydroxychloroquine was the only drug (12.5%) that did not change its price and was only purchased in the first three months of 2020. Conclusion: The purchase price of the vast majority of drugs announced as "therapeutic promises" for the treatment of Covid-19 in Brazil suffered a significant increase during the pandemic period.
Assuntos
Coronavirus , COVID-19 , Automedicação , Terapêutica , Preço de Medicamento , Preparações Farmacêuticas , HidroxicloroquinaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: DM spending in the world is high, and Brazilian studies of public spending caused by DM are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the annual direct cost for the municipal health sphere, related to DM2 treatment, in patients with and without glycemic control. METHOD: A cross-sectional study carried out in a city in the interior of Minas Gerais state, with patients with DM2, being municipal PHS users. Data were collected from the computerized system of the municipality and patient records, and analyzed using the IBM SPSS v.19 statistical package. The response variable was categorized into controlled A1c (≤7%) and uncontrolled A1c (>7%). RESULTS: Glycemic control in 56.6% of the patients was unsatisfactory; the mean cost of pharmacotherapy for DM2 was US$ 3.14 per year for patients in the control group and US$ 45.54 per year for uncontrolled patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with unsatisfactory glycemic control are more expensive for the municipal health system.