Evaluation of Primary Healthcare Centers' Service Availability and Readiness for Implementing Diabetes Care in Abuja, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional, Formative Assessment.

Introduction: Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are associated with a high and rising burden of morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, including Nigeria. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is among the leading causes of NCD-related deaths worldwide and is a foremost public health problem in Nigeria. As part of the National Multi-Sectoral Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs, Nigeria has committed to implementing the World Health Organization (WHO) Package of Essential NCD control interventions. Implementing the intervention requires the availability of essential elements, including guidelines, trained staff, health management information systems, equipment, and medications, in primary healthcare centers (PHCs). This study assessed the availability of the WHO package components and the readiness of PHCs to implement a DM screening, evaluation, and management program. Methods: This cross-sectional formative assessment adapted the WHO Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool to survey 30 PHCs selected by multistage sampling for readiness to deliver DM diagnosis and care in Abuja, Nigeria, between August 2021 and October 2021. The service availability and readiness indicator scores were calculated based on the proportion of PHCs with available DM care services, minimum staff requirement, diagnostic tests, equipment, medications, and national guidelines/protocols for DM care within the defined SARA domain. Results: All 30 PHCs reported the availability of at least two full-time staff (median [interquartile range] staff = 5 [4-9]), which were mostly community health extension workers (median [interquartile range]) = 3 [1-4]. At least one staff member was recently trained in DM care in only 11 (36%) of the PHCs. The study also reported high availability (100%) of paper-based health management information systems (HMIS) and DM screening services using a glucometer (87%), but low availability of DM treatment (23%), printed job aids (27%), and national guidelines/protocols (0%). Conclusion: This systematic assessment of PHCs' readiness to implement a DM screening, evaluation, and management program in Abuja demonstrated readiness to integrate DM care into PHCs in terms of equipment, paper-based HMIS, and nonphysician health workers' availability. However, strategies are needed to promote DM health workforce training, provide DM management guidelines, and ensure a reliable supply of essential DM medications.

Cost analysis of the WHO-HEARTS program for hypertension control and CVD prevention in primary health facilities in Ethiopia.

Background: In 2020, Ethiopia launched the Ethiopia Hypertension Control Initiative (EHCI) program to improve hypertension care using the approach described in the WHO HEARTS technical package. Objective: To estimate the costs of implementing the HEARTS program for hypertension control and cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in the primary care setting in Ethiopia for adult primary care users in the catchment area of five examined facilities. Study design: This study entails a program cost analysis using cross-sectional primary and secondary data. Methods: Micro-costing facility surveys were used to assess activity costs related to training, counselling, screening, lab diagnosis, medications, monitoring, and start-up costs at five selected health facilities. Cost data were obtained from primary and secondary sources, and expert opinion. Annual costs from the health system perspective were estimated using the Excel-based HEARTS costing tool under two intervention scenarios - hypertension-only control and a CVD risk management program, which addresses diabetes and hypercholesterolemia in addition to hypertension. Results: The estimated cost per adult primary care user was USD 5.3 for hypertension control and USD 19.3 for integrated CVD risk management. The estimated medication cost per person treated for hypertension was USD 9.0, whereas treating diabetes and high cholesterol would cost USD 15.4 and USD 15.3 per person treated, respectively. Medications were the major cost driver, accounting for 37% of the total cost in the hypertension control program. In the CVD risk management scenario, the proportions of medication and lab diagnostics of total costs were 18% and 64%, respectively. Conclusions: The results from this study can inform planning and budgeting for HEARTS scale-up to prevent CVD across Ethiopia.

Effect of PEPFAR funding policy change on HIV service delivery in a large HIV care and treatment network in Nigeria.

The transition to PEPFAR 2.0 with its focus on country ownership was accompanied by substantial funding cuts. We describe the impact of this transition on HIV care in a large network of HIV clinics in Nigeria. We surveyed 30 comprehensive HIV treatment clinics to assess services supported before (October 2013-September 2014) and after (October 2014-September 2015) the PEPFAR funding policy change, the impact of these policy changes on service delivery areas, and response of clinics to the change. We compared differences in support for staffing, laboratory services, and clinical operations pre- and post-policy change using paired t-tests. We used framework analysis to assess answers to open ended questions describing responses to the policy change. Most sites (83%, n = 25) completed the survey. The majority were public (60%, n = 15) and secondary (68%, n = 17) facilities. Clinics had a median of 989 patients in care (IQR: 543-3326). All clinics continued to receive support for first and second line antiretrovirals and CD4 testing after the policy change, while no clinics received support for other routine drug monitoring labs. We found statistically significant reductions in support for viral load testing, staff employment, defaulter tracking, and prevention services (92% vs. 64%, p = 0.02; 80% vs. 20%, 100% vs. 44%, 84% vs. 16%, respectively, p<0.01 for all) after the policy change. Service delivery was hampered by interrupted laboratory services and reduced wages and staff positions leading to reduced provider morale, and compromised quality of care. Almost all sites (96%) introduced user fees to address funding shortages. Clinics in Nigeria are experiencing major challenges in providing routine HIV services as a result of PEPFAR's policy changes. Funding cutbacks have been associated with compromised quality of care, staff shortages, and reliance on fee-based care for historically free services. Sustainable HIV services funding models are urgently needed.

The patient-centered medical home: a reality for HIV care in Nigeria.

OBJECTIVE: HIV care delivery in resource-limited settings (RLS) may serve as a paradigm for chronic disease care, but comprehensive measurement frameworks are lacking. Our objective was to adapt the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) framework for use in RLS, and evaluate the performance of HIV treatment programs within this framework. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional survey administered within the AIDS Prevention Initiative in Nigeria (APIN) network. PARTICIPANTS: Medical directors at APIN clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We adapted the 2011 US National Committee on Quality Assurance's PCMH standard to develop a survey measuring five domains of HIV care: (i) enhancing access and continuity, (ii) identifying and managing patient populations, (iii) planning and managing care, (iv) promoting self-care and support and (v) measuring and improving performance. RESULTS: Thirty-three of 36 clinics completed the survey. Most were public (73%) and urban/semi-urban (64%); 52% had >500 patients in care. On a 0-100 scale, clinics scored highest in self-care and support, 91% (63-100%); managing patient populations, 80% (72-81%) and improving performance, 72% (44-78%). Clinics scored lowest with the most variability in planning/managing care, 65% (22-89%), and access and continuity, 61% (33-80%). Average score across all domains was 72% (58-81%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the modified PCMH tool is feasible, and likely has sufficient performance variation to discriminate among clinics. Consistent with extant literature, clinics showed greatest room for improvement on access and continuity, supporting the tool's face validity. The modified PCMH tool may provide a powerful framework for evaluating chronic HIV care in RLS.