Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1164326, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37546332

RESUMO

Background: Preventing infection in healthcare workers (HCWs) is crucial for protecting healthcare systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we investigated the seroepidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in HCWs in Norway with low-transmission settings. Methods: From March 2020, we recruited HCWs at four medical centres. We determined infection by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and serological testing and evaluated the association between infection and exposure variables, comparing our findings with global data in a meta-analysis. Anti-spike IgG antibodies were measured after infection and/or vaccination in a longitudinal cohort until June 2021. Results: We identified a prevalence of 10.5% (95% confidence interval, CI: 8.8-12.3) in 2020 and an incidence rate of 15.0 cases per 100 person-years (95% CI: 12.5-17.8) among 1,214 HCWs with 848 person-years of follow-up time. Following infection, HCWs (n = 63) mounted durable anti-spike IgG antibodies with a half-life of 4.3 months since their seropositivity. HCWs infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020 (n = 46) had higher anti-spike IgG titres than naive HCWs (n = 186) throughout the 5 months after vaccination with BNT162b2 and/or ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 vaccines in 2021. In a meta-analysis including 20 studies, the odds ratio (OR) for SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was significantly higher with household contact (OR 12.6; 95% CI: 4.5-35.1) and occupational exposure (OR 2.2; 95% CI: 1.4-3.2). Conclusion: We found high and modest risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection with household and occupational exposure, respectively, in HCWs, suggesting the need to strengthen infection prevention strategies within households and medical centres. Infection generated long-lasting antibodies in most HCWs; therefore, we support delaying COVID-19 vaccination in primed HCWs, prioritising the non-infected high-risk HCWs amid vaccine shortage.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Formação de Anticorpos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Vacina BNT162 , Pandemias , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Medição de Risco , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Pessoal de Saúde , Imunoglobulina G
2.
J Healthc Qual ; 41(3): 154-159, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31094948

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Daily phlebotomy is often a standard procedure in hospitalized patients. Recently, this practice has begun receiving attention as a potential target for efforts focused on eliminating overuse. Several organizations have published their efforts in this arena. Interventions have included education, feedback, and changes to computerized provider order entry (CPOE) but have yielded mixed results. METHODS: A quality improvement initiative to reduce the utilization of daily phlebotomy was conducted at a 505-bed Academic Medical Center. This project involved a combination of educational interventions and changes to CPOE. The primary end point evaluated was the daily performance of complete blood counts (CBCs) and basic metabolic profiles (BMPs) on medical and surgery units relative to the corresponding hospital census. RESULTS: Over the course of this project from August 1, 2013, to September 23, 2016, there was a 15.2% reduction in CBCs (p < .001 for linear trend) and 13.1% reduction in BMPs. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that layering multimodal interventions that involve both "hard-wired" changes to CPOE and education and performance feedback can result in decreased utilization of phlebotomy.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/economia , Sistemas de Registro de Ordens Médicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Flebotomia/economia , Flebotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise Custo-Benefício/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
4.
Epilepsia ; 53(6): 962-9, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22432967

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), a large proportion of people with epilepsy do not receive treatment. An analysis of the availability, price, and affordability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was conducted to evaluate whether these factors contribute to the treatment gap. METHODS: Data for five AEDs (phenytoin, carbamazepine, valproic acid, phenobarbital, and diazepam) were obtained from facility-based surveys conducted in 46 countries using the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) methodology. Outcome measures were percentage availability, ratios of local prices to international reference prices, and number of days' wages needed by the lowest-paid unskilled government worker to purchase treatment. Prices were adjusted for inflation/deflation and purchasing power parity. KEY FINDINGS: The average availability of generic AEDs in the public sector was <50% for all medicines except diazepam injection. Private sector availability of generic oral AEDs ranged from 42.2% for phenytoin to 69.6% for phenobarbital. Public sector patient prices for generic carbamazepine and phenytoin were 4.95 and 17.50 times higher than international reference prices, respectively, whereas private sector patient prices were 11.27 and 24.77 times higher, respectively. For both medicines, originator brand prices were about 30 times higher. The highest prices were observed in the lowest income countries. The lowest-paid government worker would need wages from 1-2.6 days' to purchase a month's supply of phenytoin, whereas carbamazepine would cost 2.7-16.2 days' wages. Despite its widespread use in LMICs, WHO/HAI survey data for phenobarbital was only available from a small number of countries. SIGNIFICANCE: In LMICs, availability and affordability of AEDs are poor and may be acting as a barrier to accessing treatment for epilepsy. Ensuring a consistent supply of AEDs at an affordable price should be a priority.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia , Saúde Global , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticonvulsivantes/economia , Anticonvulsivantes/provisão & distribuição , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Países em Desenvolvimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Epilepsia/economia , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA