Inter-Rater Reliability for the Amputation Endpoint in the National Vascular Quality Initiative.

BACKGROUND: National quality reporting efforts after revascularization for peripheral artery disease (PAD) are ongoing. Validation of endpoints are necessary in national quality registries. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the interrater reliability for the endpoint of major amputation at 1 year in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry and the Medicare-linked Vascular Quality Initiative registry (VQI-VISION) against electronic health record (EHR) review. METHODS: Surgical or endovascular revascularization procedures between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, in the VQI registry and VQI-VISION for 2 academic health systems were queried. Major amputation data were abstracted by trained data collectors for the VQI and derived from Current Procedural Terminology codes for VQI-VISION. Cases underwent protocolized adjudication for the endpoint of major amputation by EHR review. Paired tests were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity. Spearman's ρ and Cohen's κ were used to evaluate interrater reliability. RESULTS: Amputation endpoints for 1,936 revascularizations were examined. Compared with major amputation data in EHR review, the sensitivity for the VQI registry was 35.9% and the specificity was 99.4% (ρ = 0.53; κ = 0.48). For VQI-VISION, sensitivity was 67.7% and specificity was 98.9% (ρ = 0.75; κ = 0.74). For any amputation in VQI data, sensitivity was 35.3% and specificity was 99.3% (ρ = 0.53; κ = 0.46), and for VQI-VISION, they were 71.6% and 97.7%, respectively (ρ = 0.75; κ = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Almost two-thirds of the amputations in the VQI registry and one-third of amputations in VQI-VISION were missing at 1 year compared against adjudicated EHR review. In preparing for national reporting systems for major amputation tracking, data collection system reform is needed.

Motion Analysis: An Objective Assessment of Special Operations Forces and Tactical Medics Performing Point-of-Care Ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is commonly employed to image the heart, lungs, and abdomen. Rapid ultrasound for shock and hypotension (RUSH) exams are a critical component of POCUS employed in austere environments by Special Operations Forces (SOF) and tactical medics for triage and diagnosis. Despite its utility, training for POCUS remains largely unstandardized with respect to feedback and markers of proficiency. We hypothesized that motion analysis could objectively identify improvement in medics' performance of RUSH exams. Furthermore, we predicted that motion metrics would correlate with qualitative ratings administered by attending anesthesiologists. METHODS: A team of civilian and military attending anesthesiologists trained 24 medics in POCUS during a 5-day course. Each medic performed eight RUSH exams using an ultrasound probe equipped with an electromagnetic motion sensor to track total distance travelled (path length), movements performed (translational motions), degrees rotated (rotational sum), and time. Instructors (experts) observed and rated the exams on the following items: image finding, image fine-tuning, speed, final image accuracy, and global assessment. Motion metrics were used to provide feedback to medics throughout the course. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze the trends of motion metrics across all trials. Correlations amongst motion metrics and expert ratings were assessed with Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Participants exhibited a negative trend in all motion metrics (p < 0.001). Pearson correlation coefficients revealed moderate inverse correlations amongst motion metrics and expert ratings. CONCLUSION: Motion analysis was able to quantify and describe the performance of medics training in POCUS and correlated with expert ratings.

Closed Bronchoscopy System: An Innovative Approach to Minimize Aerosolization During Bronchoscopy.

Health care workers performing aerosolizing procedures on patients with transmissible infections such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are at high-risk for disease acquisition. Current guidelines designed to protect health care workers during aerosolizing procedures prioritize personal protective equipment and enhanced infection control techniques, in particular during procedures such as intubation. To date, little emphasis has been placed on risk mitigation in the setting of bronchoscopy, a procedure that has significant aerosolization potential. Herein, we present an innovative closed bronchoscopy system designed to reduce aerosolization during bronchoscopy.