Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Hand Surg Am ; 41(2): 219-224.e1, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26684714

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare 4 recognized upper-limb scoring systems that are regularly used to assess wrist function after injury. METHODS: We reviewed 116 patients 6 months after volar locking plate fixation for distal radius fractures. Two purely subjective and 2 composite scoring systems composed of both subjective and objective components were compared along with visual numerical scores for pain and function and objective measures of function. Each score was standardized into a scale from 0 to 100. RESULTS: The distribution of the standardized total scores was statistically significantly different and indicated marked variability between scoring systems and therefore the information provided. Overall, the subjective scoring systems correlated well with each other and with both visual numerical scores for pain and function. However, the composite scores and objective measures of function correlated poorly with the subjective scores including the visual numerical scores. CONCLUSIONS: Results from wrist scoring systems should be interpreted with caution. It is important to ensure that the component parts of each score are taken into consideration separately because total scores may be misleading. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Composite scores may be outdated and should be avoided.


Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Placas Ósseas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA