Measuring Physical Functioning Using Wearable Sensors in Parkinson Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (the Accuracy of Digital Assessment of Performance Trial Study): Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Physical capacity and physical activity are important aspects of physical functioning and quality of life in people with a chronic disease such as Parkinson disease (PD) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Both physical capacity and physical activity are currently measured in the clinic using standardized questionnaires and tests, such as the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). However, relying only on in-clinic tests is suboptimal since they offer limited information on how a person functions in daily life and how functioning fluctuates throughout the day. Wearable sensor technology may offer a solution that enables us to better understand true physical functioning in daily life. OBJECTIVE: We aim to study whether device-assisted versions of 6MWT and TUG, such that the tests can be performed independently at home using a smartwatch, is a valid and reliable way to measure the performance compared to a supervised, in-clinic test. METHODS: This is a decentralized, prospective, observational study including 100 people with PD and 100 with COPD. The inclusion criteria are broad: age ≥18 years, able to walk independently, and no co-occurrence of PD and COPD. Participants are followed for 15 weeks with 4 in-clinic visits, once every 5 weeks. Outcomes include several walking tests, cognitive tests, and disease-specific questionnaires accompanied by data collection using wearable devices (the Verily Study Watch and Modus StepWatch). Additionally, during the last 10 weeks of this study, participants will follow an aerobic exercise training program aiming to increase physical capacity, creating the opportunity to study the responsiveness of the remote 6MWT. RESULTS: In total, 89 people with PD and 65 people with COPD were included in this study. Data analysis will start in April 2024. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will provide information on the measurement properties of the device-assisted 6MWT and TUG in the clinic and at home. When reliable and valid, this can contribute to a better understanding of a person's physical capacity in real life, which makes it possible to personalize treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05756075; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05756075. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55452.

Frailty Assessment in Advanced Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have recently demonstrated the value of frailty assessment in a general heart failure (HF) population; however, it is unknown whether these findings are also applicable in advanced HF. We investigated the utility of frailty assessment and its prognostic value in elderly patients with advanced HF. METHODS: Forty consecutive elderly subjects aged ≥65 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, New York Heart Association class III or IV, and a 6-minute walk test <300 m were enrolled from the HF clinic at Montefiore Medical Center between October 2012 and July 2013. Subjects were assessed for frailty with the Fried Frailty Index, consisting of 5 components: hand grip strength, 15-foot walk time, weight loss, physical activity, and exhaustion. All subjects were prospectively followed for death or hospitalization. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean age of the cohort was 74.9 ± 6.5 years, 58% female, left ventricular ejection fraction 25.6 ± 6.4%, 6-minute walk test 195.8 ± 74.3 m and length of follow-up 454 ± 186 days. Thirty-five percent were prefrail and 65% were frail. Frailty status was associated with the combined primary endpoint of mortality and all-cause hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.25, P = .013). On individual analysis, frailty was associated with all-cause hospitalizations (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.12-3.27, P = .017) and non-HF hospitalizations (HR 3.31, 95% CI 1.14- 9.6, P = .028), but was not associated with HF hospitalizations alone (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.68-2.49, P = .380). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty assessment in patients with advanced HF is feasible and provides prognostic value. These findings warrant validation in a larger cohort.