[A suspect cluster of childhood cancer in Valle di Ledro (Province of Trento, Northern Italy). Epidemiological evaluation, risk management, and communication activities, 2018-2020]. / Un sospetto cluster di tumori infantili in Valle di Ledro (provincia di Trento). Valutazione epidemiologica e attività di comunicazione e gestione del rischio. Anni 2018-2020.

BACKGROUND: leukaemia is the most prevalent form of childhood cancer, an overall rare condition in childhood. Even few cases occurring in a small community can cause considerable apprehension among the population. From 2014 to 2017, 4 cases of childhood cancer occurred in Valle di Ledro, a municipality of 5,300 inhabitants in Province of Trento (Northern Italy), and a group of concerned citizens asked provincial health authorities for an investigation. OBJECTIVES: to address the community's health needs by verifying the hypothesis of a cluster of childhood cancer and through effective risk communication activities. DESIGN: retrospective cohort analysis based on data from the Cancer registry of the Autonomous Province of Trento and data collected from hospital discharge records. The communication activities were carried out according to the recommendations published by Epidemiologia&Prevenzione in 2016 in a Supplement "Childhood cancers, risk factors and investigation models for the evaluation of spatio-temporal clusters". SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Valle di Ledro, a municipality of 5,300 inhabitants in the Province of Trento. The participants in risk communication process were: city council; grassroot committee of concerned parents; health workforce of different services (epidemiology, cancer registry, public health; environmental health; primary health care; personnel of the Environmental Protection Agency; journalists; general population. The participants in the statistical analyses were: children of 0-14 years of age who were diagnosed a cancer from 1998 to 2014 in the Province of Trento (N. 212); leukaemia (N. 84) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (N. 66) incident cases in the period 1998-2017 in Trento province. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: verification of the presence of a cluster of childhood cancers; degree of consensus and collaboration of the different community stakeholders to the survey procedures and acceptance of the final results; atmosphere in public assemblies and feedback in the local press. RESULTS: a total of 212 incident cancer cases in children 0-14 years have been registred in Province of Trento from 1998 to 2014, leukaemia in 35% (N. 74) cases. From 2015 to 2017, another 10 cases of leukaemia occurred, for a total of 84 cases of leukaemia from 1998 to 2017. In the years from 1998 to 2017, in Valle di Ledro, taking the Italian population as reference group, the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were the following: cancer, all types 1,47 (IC95% 0,40-3,76); leukaemia 3,39 (IC95% 0,70-9,90), LLA 2,81 (IC95% 0,34-10,16). No cluster emerged from the geographical analyses. From the very beginning of the risk management approach, a decision-making working group was set up applying a participatory approach. Group members included the city council and the local committee of concerned parents and experts from different services of the local health unit. Data analyses was delegated to a technical working group that reported back to the decision-making group. Members of the technical working group were supervised by external experts. Following this approach, it was possible to establish a climate of trust and credibility. The involvement of all stakeholders right from the start in a totally transparent process was a key element of success. CONCLUSIONS: the cluster hypothesis was rejected for both childhood cancer (all types) and leukaemia (all types and ALL). The implementation of the risk communication process recommended by the AIE guidelines was successful in establishing a climate of reciprocal trust that allowed to overcome inevitable moments of conflict in a productive manner. Thanks to this positive atmosphere, the communication of the results of the statistical analyses was effective in reassuring the population.

Barriers to Accessing Primary Care and Appropriateness of Healthcare Among Immigrants in Italy.

INTRODUCTION: The health status and health care needs of immigrant populations must be assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate barriers to accessing primary care and the appropriateness of health care among resident immigrants in Italy, using indicators regarding maternal health, avoidable hospitalization, and emergency care. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using some indicators of the National Monitoring System of Health Status and Healthcare of the Immigrant Population (MSHIP), coordinated by the National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP), calculated on perinatal care, hospital discharge, and emergency department databases for the years 2016-2017 in nine Italian regions (Piedmont, Trento, Bolzano, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Umbria, Latium, Basilicata, Sicily). The analyses were conducted comparing immigrant and Italian residents. RESULTS: Compared to Italian women, immigrant women had fewer than five gynecological examinations (8.5 vs. 16.3%), fewer first examinations after the 12th week of gestational age (3.8 vs. 12.5%), and fewer than two ultrasounds (1.0 vs. 3.8%). Compared to Italians, immigrants had higher standardized rates (× 1,000 residents) of avoidable hospitalizations (males: 2.1 vs. 1.4; females: 0.9 vs. 0.7) and of access to emergency departments for non-urgent conditions (males: 62.0 vs. 32.7; females: 52.9 vs. 31.4). CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, there appear to be major issues regarding accessing services and care for the immigrant population. Policies aimed at improving socioeconomic conditions and promoting integration can promote healthy lifestyles and appropriate access to health care, counteracting the emergence of health inequities in the immigrant population.

[Evaluating health care of the immigrant population in Italy through indicators of a national monitoring system]. / Valutazione dell'assistenza sanitaria della popolazione immigrata in Italia attraverso alcuni indicatori di un sistema nazionale di monitoraggio.

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate maternal and child healthcare, avoidable hospitalisation, access to emergency services among immigrants in Italy. DESIGN: cross sectional study of some health and health care indicators among Italian and foreign population residing in Italy in 2016-2017. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: indicators based on the national monitoring system coordinated by the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) of Rome, calculated on perinatal care (CedAP), hospital discharge (SDO), emergency services (EMUR) archives for the years 2016-2017, by of the following regions: Piedmont, Trento, Bolzano, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Umbria, Lazio, Basilicata, Sicily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: number and timeliness of pregnancy visits, number of ultrasounds, invasive prenatal investigations; perinatal mortality rates, birth weight, Apgar score at 5 minutes, need for neonatal resuscitation; standardized rates of avoidable hospitalisation and access to emergency services by triage code. RESULTS: more often than Italians, immigrant women have during pregnancy: less than 5 gynaecological examination (16.3% vs 8.5%), first examination after the 12th week of gestational age (12.5% vs 3.8%), less than 2 ultrasounds (3.8% vs 1.0%). Higher perinatal mortality rates among immigrants compared to Italians (3.6 vs 2.3 x1,000). Higher standardized rates (x1,000) among immigrants compared to Italians of avoidable hospitalisation (men: 2.1 vs 1.4; women: 0.9 vs 0.7) and of white triage codes in emergency (men: 62.0 vs 32.7; women: 52.9 vs 31.4). CONCLUSIONS: study findings show differences in access and outcomes of healthcare between Italians and immigrants. National monitoring system of indicators, coordinated by INMP, represents a useful tool for healthcare intervention policies aimed to health equity.