Deep-vein thrombosis in Europe - Burden of illness in relationship to healthcare resource utilization and return to work.

OBJECTIVES: Deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) forms a major healthcare burden in Europe, but exact estimates concerning the economic burden on society are lacking. This study reports results from the PREFER in VTE study concerning resource utilization and absence from work in DVT patients. METHODS: The PREFER in VTE registry was a prospective, observational, multicenter study carried out in Europe (France, Italy, Spain, the UK, and DACH [Germany, Switzerland and Austria]), designed to provide data concerning treatment patterns, resource utilization, mortality and quality of life. Patients with a first-time and/or recurrent DVT, were recruited and followed for 12 months. Data about resource utilization concerns resource utilization related to DVT. Specifically, treatment pattern, re-hospitalization rate, length of hospital stay, ambulatory/office visit, and proportion of patients returning to work, were analyzed and presented. Subgroup analysis by country and active cancer were also conducted. The length of hospital stay was analyzed as a function of demographics, previous events and co-morbidities using zero-inflated binomial negative regression. Similarly, time until return to work was analyzed using Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 2056 patients with DVT were recruited, with an average age of 60 years. Patients with active cancer were mostly treated with heparin (83.9%), while patients without active cancer were treated with combinations of heparin, VKA and DOACs. DOACs were less often used in Spain and Italy (<7.0%). Following the management of their initial DVT 20.5% of the patients with and 12.2% of patients without active cancer (n = 88; n = 1462) were hospitalized for on average 8.2 and 10.1 days, respectively. The hospitalization-rate was highest in Italy (16.7%) and lowest in France (7.7%). Furthermore, the average length of stay was highest in Italy (16.6 days) and lowest in DACH (5.2 days). Physician visits were highest in DACH (9.3), lowest in the UK (2.6). Of those working, 50% returned to work at 1 month; >30% did not return to work within the year. CONCLUSIONS: Medical treatment of DVT differed between patients with active cancer and those without. Post-VTE or VTE-related resource utilization differs remarkably between countries. Work-loss seems high, but questions may be raised concerning the causality due to the presence of co-morbidities.

[DRG-based cost analysis of inpatient conservative treatment of stage III/IV peripheral arterial occlusive disease]. / DRG-basierte Kostenanalyse zur stationären konservativen Behandlung der PAVK Stadium III/IV.

UNLABELLED: DRG-based cost analysis of inpatient conservative treatment of PAD stage III/IV BACKGROUND: In a prospective study carried out by the German Society of Angiology and the DRG Competence Center, Munich, the question was investigated whether the costs of conservative treatment of patients with PAOD stage III/IV (DRG F65) are adequately represented within the current G-DRG system. METHODS UND PATIENTS: Between September 1 and December 16, 2002, a total of 704 patients with DRG F65 (peripheral vascular diseases) were evaluated at 8 angiologic centers in Germany. Apart from the length of hospital stay, the total costs (cost equivalents) were calculated using a method developed by the DRG Research Group at the University of Münster. Moreover, the study population was compared with a German calculation sample for the DRGs F65A/B, as published by InEK. RESULTS: As it turned out, conservatively treated patients with PAOD stage III or IV (DRGs F65A/B) cause significantly (p < 0.001) higher costs and have significantly (p < 0.001) greater lengths of hospital stay than patients who were also assigned to DRG F65 because of other vascular diseases. At the same time it became clear that angiologic centers treat twice as many patients with critical limb ischemia in comparison with the German average. The reimbursement hitherto estimated by InEK covers not even half the cost actually produced by conservative treatment of PAD stage III/IV. CONCLUSION: To ensure a performance-related reimbursement, a new basis DRG for patients with PAD stage III/IV has to be created, as has ben proposed by the German Society of Angiology. Otherwise, adequate conservative therapy in accordance with existing guidelines, of patients who cannot be treated surgically or interventionally will not be possible any more in the future.

The poor man's capillary microscope. A novel technique for the assessment of capillary morphology.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a new method for rapid and efficient assessment of capillary morphology. METHODS: Nailfold capillary morphology in 18 patients with Raynaud's phenomenon was investigated with a new bedside test, based on a modified dermatoscope using a novel gel-immersion technique. These findings were compared with those obtained by standard capillary microscopy. RESULTS: With the standard microscope, six patients had dilated capillaries, six had mega-capillaries, seven had avascular fields, eight had ramified capillaries, six had contorted capillaries, and seven patients showed micro-haemorrhages, respectively. The dermatoscope identified exactly the same patients to have the same capillary abnormalities. One hundred and thirty six fingers were available for pairwise comparison: The kappa statistic was 0.93 for dilated capillaries, 0.97 for mega-capillaries, 0.93 for avascular areas, 0.78 for ramified capillaries, 0.81 for contorted capillaries, and 0.94 for micro-haemorrhages, respectively. The average examination time was 18 (range 8-30) minutes with the standard microscope and 4 (3-8) minutes with the dermatoscope. CONCLUSION: A new diagnostic tool for rapid and efficient examination of nailfold capillaries is described for circumstances when a standard microscope is not available. This study shows that the hand held device can be used in clinical routine with sufficient diagnostic efficacy and little expenditure, both timewise and financially.

[Risk of thrombosis with oral contraceptives: value of a thrombophilia screening test]. / Thromboserisiko bei oralen Kontrazeptiva: Stellenwert eines Thrombophilie-Screenings.

Oral contraceptives increase the natural incidence of venous thrombosis of 1-2/10,000 women per year 3- to 4-fold. Recent studies have shown that desogestrel or gestodene containing formulations bear twice the risk of older low-dose ovulation inhibitors. During pregnancy, the incidence of thrombosis rises to 10/10,000 women-years and post partum up to 40/ 10,000. For 60% of thromboses no causal explanation can be found. In approximately 40% of the patients an inherited thrombophilia can be presumed. Among the hereditary types of thrombophilia, a resistance to activated protein C (APC-resistance) represents nearly 50%, while in 15 to 20% a deficiency of antithrombin III, protein C or protein S is found. APC-resistance, with a prevalence of 3-5% in the general population, increases the risk of thrombosis 8-fold and in users of oral contraceptives 35-fold. Antithrombin III-deficiency carries a comparable risk. Protein C-deficiency increases the risk of thrombosis 9-fold and in users of oral contraceptives 15-fold. Ovulation inhibitors do not influence the risk of thrombosis in women with protein S-deficiency. Anti-phospholipid-antibodies increase during treatment with oral contraceptives and represent a considerably enhanced risk of thrombosis. Inherent thrombophilia is suspected in a patient with a positive history or family history of thrombosis, especially with thrombosis before the age of 40 or with atypical localisation. Even in these risk groups, the cost-benefit ratio of selective screening is unfavorable, as today at most 70% of the hereditary thrombophilias can be diagnosed by laboratory analysis, and only very few of the patients will actually experience a thrombotic event: only 3 of 1000 carriers of APC-resistance will suffer from thrombosis during oral contraception. On the other hand, a negative result of laboratory tests does not exclude a hereditary thrombophilic disorder. At present, it is unclear whether a selective screening process is superior to a careful assessment of individual and family history. A general screening, however, cannot be justified because of the unfavorable cost/benefit ratio. If the individual or family history or pathological laboratory parameters indicate an increased risk of thrombosis, this risk has to be carefully weighed against the consequences of discontinuation of pill use. Those few individuals with risk factors who will experience a thrombo-embolic event, cannot be identified in advance. If oral contraceptives represent a particularly high risk in patients with thrombophilic disorders and/or other risk factors, other contraceptive methods should be considered. If a patient with risk factors decides on the use of oral contraceptives, she must be informed that in the case of symptoms indicating a thrombosis, a physician should be consulted immediately. The earlier an appropriate therapy is initiated, the more effectively pulmonary thrombo-embolism and permanent damage, such as the post-phlebitic syndrome, can be prevented.