Assessment of Functional Outcomes of an Autospreader Flap and Spreader Graft in Rhinoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Nasal obstruction after rhinoplasty occurs due to narrowing of the internal nasal valve. Narrowing is due to osteotomy performed to close the open roof of nose after dorsum hump resection. Spreader grafts and autospreader flaps are used to prevent such narrowing. in this study, we aimed to compare the effects of these 2 rhinoplasty techniques on olfactory function, nasal air passage opening, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: In this prospective study, 48 rhinoplasty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups according to graft technique used, either spreader graft or autospreader flap. These 2 groups were compared for patient satisfaction. The sinonasal outcome test-22, peak nasal flowmetry, and Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center test were applied to all patients before and 8 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: The study enrolled 48 patients. Nasal airflow increased in both groups postoperatively. in the preoperative and postoperative comparison of odor functions, postoperative odor functions were similar in both groups. In the autospreader flap group, the preoperative rhinoplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire score was 4.1 ±â€Š2.2 versus 21.3 ±â€Š2.6 in the third postoperative month. The preoperative rhinoplasty outcome evaluation score was 3.9 ±â€Š2.1 in the spreader graft group and 19.7 ±â€Š1.9 in the third postoperative month. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, postoperative nasal airflow improved in the patients in both the spreader graft and autospreader flap groups. in the patient satisfaction surveys after rhinoplasty, the satisfaction of the patients in the autospreader flap group was higher than that of the patients in the spreader graft group.

The validity of simplified self-report pain intensity assessment tools in preschool-age children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.

PURPOSE: To assess the validity of simplified pain scales, including the Simplified Faces Pain Scale (S-FPS) and Simplified Concrete Ordinal Scale (S-COS) in preschool-age children who underwent adenotonsillectomy (T&A) by comparing the values of simplified pain scales with the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) and the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) observational pain scale. METHODS: The present study consisted of 100 pediatric patients between the ages of 3 and 6 years old who had T&A. A two-step pain assessment approach with S-FPS and S-COS and FPS-R and FLACC pain scales was performed with children with the help of their parents or caregivers at the 1st, 6th and 12th hours, and over the 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: The mean scores of S-FPS and S-COS were higher than the mean FPS-R scores for each time point for all age groups. The total number of children reporting no pain was higher for FPS-R than S-FPS and S-COS for each age group and the difference was significant for 3-, 4- and 5- year olds. S-FPS, S-COS and FPS-R showed a moderate correlation with FLACC in all age groups, whereas the correlation values were not significantly different between the tests. CONCLUSION: In the present study, we found that S-FPS and S-COS were valid options for estimating pain in preschool children including 3- and 4-year-olds who underwent T&A.

Assessment of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials and video head impulse test in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with or without polyneuropathy.

This study aimed to compare cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP), ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMP) and video head impulse test (vHIT) results between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) or diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and healthy controls to determine vestibular end-organ pathologies. The participants in the present study consisted of three groups: the type 2 DM group (n = 33 patients), the DPN group (n = 33 patients), and the age- and sex-matched control group (n = 35). Cervical VEMP, oVEMP and vHIT were performed for each participant in the study and test results were compared between the groups. Peak-to-peak amplitudes of cVEMP (p13-n21) and oVEMP (n10-p15) were significantly lower in the DM and DPN groups than the control group. The values of vHIT were not statistically different between the groups. To our knowledge, the present study is the first report investigating oVEMP and cVEMP responses combined with vHIT findings in patients with DM and DPN. Vestibular end-organ pathologies can be determined via clinical vestibular diagnostic tools in spite of prominent vestibular symptoms in patients with type 2 DM as well as patients with DPN.