Correlating the Radiological Assessment of Patient Motion with the Incidence of Repeat Sequences Documented by Log Files.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate a radiological assessment of MR motion artifacts with the incidence of repeated sequences and delays derived from modality log files (MLFs) and investigate the suitability of log files for quantifying the operational impact of patient motion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An experienced, blinded neuroradiologist retrospectively evaluated one full calendar month of sequentially obtained clinical MR exams of the head and/or brain for the presence of motion artifacts using a previously defined clinical grading scale. MLF data were analyzed to extract the occurrence of repeated sequences during the examinations. Statistical analysis included the determination of 95% confidence intervals for repetition ratios, and Welch's t-test to exclude the hypothesis of equal means for different groups of sequences. RESULTS: A total of 213 examinations were evaluated, comprising 1681 MLF-documented sequences, from which 1580 were archived. Radiological motion assessment scores (0, none to 4, severe) were assigned to each archived sequence. Higher motion scores correlated with a higher MLF-derived repetition probability, reflected by the average motion scores assigned to sequences that would be repeated (group 1, mean=2.5), those that are a repeat (group 2, mean=1.9), and those that are not repeated (group 3, mean=1.1) within an exam. The hypothesis of equal means was rejected with P = 5.9 × 10-5 for groups 1 and 2, P = 9.39 × 10-16 for groups 1 and 3, and P = 1.55 × 10-12 for groups 2 and 3. The repetition probability and associated time loss could be quantified for individual sequence types. The total time loss due to repeat sequence acquisition derived from MLFs was greater than four hours. CONCLUSION: Log file data may help assess patterns of scanner and exam performance and may be useful in identifying pitfalls to diagnostic imaging in a clinical environment, particularly with respect to patient motion.

Impact of pager notification on report verification times.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact on times of verification (TOVs) by a pager notification system (PNS) that informs physicians when reports are available for signature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An automated PNS was implemented in the authors' department in November 2000. Monthly report verification times of each physician were collected for 3 months in the years before and after initiation of the PNS. Radiologists enrolled in the PNS and those who were not were assigned into two groups for analysis. Mean TOVs for the two sets of 3 months and for the two groups were calculated and differences recorded. Two-tailed t tests were used to assess for statistical differences between the groups. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 37 radiologists voluntarily enrolled in the PNS (group 1). Mean TOV was 26.75 hours (standard deviation [SD] = 17.76) for these physicians before and 14.48 hours (SD = 11.86) after the PNS was employed (P < .01). For those physicians who did not enroll in the PNS, mean TOV was 11.53 hours (SD = 5.55) before and 9.77 hours (SD = 9.86) after the PNS was employed (P = .33). Both the absolute and percentage reductions in TOVs were significantly greater for those physicians enrolled in the PNS than for those who were not (P = .035). Twenty-three of 29 (79%) physicians who used the PNS showed a reduction in their report turnaround times. CONCLUSION: Linking the PNS with the radiology information system to notify physicians of unsigned reports was effective in reducing report verification times.