Is Endovascular Therapy for Stroke Cost-Effective Globally? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVES: Cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy (EVT) is a key consideration for broad use of this approach for emergent large vessel occlusion stroke. We evaluated the evidence on cost-effectiveness of EVT in comparison with best medical management from a global perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review of studies published between January 2010 and May 2020 evaluated the cost effectiveness of EVT for patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke. The gain in quality adjusted life year (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per QALY resulting from EVT, were recorded. The study setting (country, economic perspective), decision model, and data sources used in economic models of EVT cost-effectiveness were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-five original studies from 12 different countries were included in our review. Five of these studies were reported from a societal perspective; 18 were reported from a healthcare system perspective. Two studies used real-world data. The time horizon varied from 1 year to a lifetime; however, 18 studies reported a time horizon of >10 years. Twenty studies reported using outcome data from randomized, controlled clinical trials for their models. Nineteen studies reported using a Markov model. Incremental QALYs ranged from 0.09-3.5. All studies but 1 reported that EVT was cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from different countries and economic perspectives suggests that EVT for stroke treatment is cost-effective. Most cost-effectiveness studies are based on outcome data from randomized clinical trials. However, there is a need to study the cost-effectiveness of EVT based solely on real-world outcome data.

Assessment of Rod Material Types in Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spine fusion surgery is traditionally performed with rigid fixation. Because the rigidity is often supraphysiologic, semirigid rods were developed. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive evaluation of rod material type on surgical outcomes has yet to be conducted. METHODS: A systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines was conducted across 3 electronic databases. After examination for inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted from the studies. RESULTS: Seventeen studies, including 1399 patients, were included in this review. The mean rigid rod fusion rate is 92.2% and 95.5% for semirigid rods (P = 0.129). The mean improvement in back pain was 60.6% in rigid rods and 71.6% in semirigid rods. The improvement in leg pain was 81.9% and 77.2%, respectively. There were no differences in visual analog scale back pain score (P = 0.098), visual analog scale leg pain score (P = 0.136), or in functional improvement between rigid and semirigid rods (P = 0.143). There was no difference (P = 0.209) in the reoperation rate between rigid rods (13.1%) and semirigid rods (6.5%). There was a comparable incidence of adjacent segment disease (3%), screw fracture (1.7%), and wound infection (1.9%) between rod material types. CONCLUSIONS: There is a moderate level of evidence supporting that surgical intervention results in high fusion rates regardless of rod material type. Surgical intervention improves back pain, leg pain, and function, with neither material type showing clear superiority. There are comparable rates of reoperation, development of adjacent segment disease, development of mechanical complications, and incidence of infection in both rigid and semirigid rods. Further studies regarding rod material type are warranted.

Safety assessment and results of coronary spasm provocation testing in patients with myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries compared to patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: Coronary spasm is an established cause for myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries, and can be diagnosed using intracoronary acetylcholine testing. However, it has been questioned whether such testing is feasible and safe in the acute phase. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of coronary spasm and the safety of the acetylcholine test in patients with myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries compared to patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronaries. METHODS: One hundred and eighty selected patients (52% women, mean age 62±13 years) with either myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries (n=80) or stable angina and unobstructed coronaries (n=100) were enrolled from 2007-2018. All patients underwent the acetylcholine test according to a standardised protocol immediately after diagnostic angiography. Apart from assessment of clinical, demographic and risk factor data, side effects and complications during the acetylcholine test were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, epicardial spasm was found in 26% with a higher prevalence among the myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries compared to the stable angina patients (35% vs 19%, p=0.017). Microvascular spasm was found in 42% with a higher prevalence among the stable patients compared to the myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries cohort (53% vs 29%, p=0.0014). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of side effects (16% vs 14%, p=0.674) or complications (1% vs 2.5%, p=0.438) between the two groups. None of the patients experienced irreversible complications. CONCLUSION: Coronary spasm is a frequent cause for myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries. Spasm provocation testing using acetylcholine is feasible in such patients in the acute phase. The complication rate during acetylcholine testing in myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries patients is low and comparable to patients with stable angina.

Safety assessment and results of coronary spasm provocation testing in patients with myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries compared to patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: Coronary spasm is an established cause for myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries, and can be diagnosed using intracoronary acetylcholine testing. However, it has been questioned whether such testing is feasible and safe in the acute phase. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of coronary spasm and the safety of the acetylcholine test in patients with myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries compared to patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronaries. METHODS: One hundred and eighty selected patients (52% women, mean age 62±13 years) with either myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries (n=80) or stable angina and unobstructed coronaries (n=100) were enrolled from 2007-2018. All patients underwent the acetylcholine test according to a standardised protocol immediately after diagnostic angiography. Apart from assessment of clinical, demographic and risk factor data, side effects and complications during the acetylcholine test were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, epicardial spasm was found in 26% with a higher prevalence among the myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries compared to the stable angina patients (35% vs 19%, p=0.017). Microvascular spasm was found in 42% with a higher prevalence among the stable patients compared to the myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries cohort (53% vs 29%, p=0.0014). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of side effects (16% vs 14%, p=0.674) or complications (1% vs 2.5%, p=0.438) between the two groups. None of the patients experienced irreversible complications. CONCLUSION: Coronary spasm is a frequent cause for myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries. Spasm provocation testing using acetylcholine is feasible in such patients in the acute phase. The complication rate during acetylcholine testing in myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries patients is low and comparable to patients with stable angina.

Severity assessment of pulmonary embolism using dual energy CT - correlation of a pulmonary perfusion defect score with clinical and morphological parameters of blood oxygenation and right ventricular failure.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate a Dual Energy (DE)-based visual perfusion defect scoring system with established CT-based and clinical parameters of pulmonary embolism (PE) severity. METHODS: In 63 PE patients, DE perfusion maps were visually scored for perfusion defects (P-score). Vascular obstruction was quantified using the Mastora score. Both scores were correlated with short-axis diameters of the right and left ventricle, their ratio (RV/LV ratio), width of the pulmonary trunk, a number of clinical parameters and each other. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Times to generate both scores were recorded. RESULTS: After univariate and multivariate analysis, a significant (p < 0.05) correlation with the P-score was shown for the Mastora score (r = 0.65), RV/LV ratio (r = 0.47), width of the pulmonary trunk (r = 0.26), troponin I (r = 0.43) and PaO(2) (r = -0.50). For the left ventricular diameter, only univariate analysis showed a significant correlation. Mastora score correlated significantly with RV/LV ratio (r = 0.36), width of the pulmonary trunk (r = 0.27), PaO(2) (r = -0.41) and troponin I (r = 0.37). Mean time for generating the P-score was significantly shorter than for the Mastora score. CONCLUSIONS: A DE-based P-score correlates with a number of parameters of PE severity. It might be easier and faster to perform than some traditional CT scoring methods for vascular obstruction.

Dual-source CT for chest pain assessment.

Comprehensive CT angiography protocols offering a simultaneous evaluation of pulmonary embolism, coronary stenoses and aortic disease are gaining attractiveness with recent CT technology. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a specific dual-source CT protocol for chest pain assessment. One hundred nine patients suffering from acute chest pain were examined on a dual-source CT scanner with ECG gating at a temporal resolution of 83 ms using a body-weight-adapted contrast material injection regimen. The images were evaluated for the cause of chest pain, and the coronary findings were correlated to invasive coronary angiography in 29 patients (27%). The files of patients with negative CT examinations were reviewed for further diagnoses. Technical limitations were insufficient contrast opacification in six and artifacts from respiration in three patients. The most frequent diagnoses were coronary stenoses, valvular and myocardial disease, pulmonary embolism, aortic aneurysm and dissection. Overall sensitivity for the identification of the cause of chest pain was 98%. Correlation to invasive coronary angiography showed 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value for coronary stenoses. Dual-source CT offers a comprehensive, robust and fast chest pain assessment.