Feasibility of selective non-operative management for penetrating abdominal trauma in France.

INTRODUCTION: In France, non-operative management (NOM) is not the widely accepted treatment for penetrating wounds. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of NOM for the treatment of penetrating abdominal traumas at 3 hospitals in the Southeast of France. METHODOLOGY: Our study was multicentric and retroprospective from January, 2010 to September, 2013. Patients presenting with a penetrating abdominal stab wound (SW) or gunshot wound (GSW) were included in the study. Those with signs of acute abdomen or hemodynamic instability had immediate surgery. Patients who were hemodynamically stable had a CT scan with contrast. If no intra-abdominal injury requiring surgery was evident, patients were observed. Criteria evaluated were failed NOM and its morbidity, rate of non-therapeutic procedures (NTP) and their morbidity, length of hospital stay and cost analysis. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included in the study. One patient died at admission. Twenty-seven were selected for NOM (20 SW and 7 GSW). Morbidity rate was 18%. Failure rate was 7.4% (2 patients) and there were no mortality. Seventy-two patients required operation of which 22 were NTP. In this sub-group, the morbidity rate was 9%. There were no mortality. Median length of hospital stay was 4 days for the NOM group and 5.5 days for group requiring surgery. Cost analysis showed an economic advantage to NOM. CONCLUSION: Implementation of NOM of penetrating trauma is feasible and safe in France. Indications may be extended even for some GSW. Clinical criteria are clearly defined but CT scan criteria should be better described to improve patient selection. NOM reduced costs and length of hospital stay.

[Vascular ischemic lesions of the kidney in multiple trauma patients: incidence and management, a report of 7 cases]. / Lésions vasculaires ischémiques rénales chez le polytraumatisé: incidence et prise en charge à propos de 7 cas.

AIMS: Study the incidence, type and outcome of traumatic ischemic arterial lesions of the kidney in multiple trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 500 multiple trauma patients who underwent whole body 64 slice CT Scan (mean age 34 years old, sex ratio 4M/1W, mean ISS 29). RESULTS: There were seven cases of vascular lesions of the left kidney 1.4% of patients (men, median age 25 years old, mean ISS43.9). These were closed traumas with sudden deceleration and dissection of the renal artery trunk in three cases and injury to its branches in four cases with preserved excretion. Three patients died of associated injuries, including one patient who received a stent on D0. One patient underwent a nephrectomy and the three other patients were not treated which did not affect renal function or pressure (follow-up 19 months). CONCLUSION: We found a high incidence of traumatic renal dissection in multiple trauma patients. Multidetector scan appears to provide the best results for the diagnosis of these lesions as well as the many associated lesions resulting in a very poor prognosis for these patients. Treatment is not well defined and management of these lesions is often of secondary importance because of the severity of associated injuries.