Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(4S Suppl 2): S172-S178, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556669

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The fully synthetic skin substitute, NovoSorb Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM), may be a cost-effective alternative to the animal-derived Integra Dermal Regeneration Template (IDRT). However, the current literature insufficiently compares the two. Therefore, our study compared clinical, aesthetic, and economic outcomes in treating soft tissue wounds with IDRT, an animal-derived template, vs BTM, a fully synthetic template. METHODS: Our single-center retrospective study compared outcomes of 26 patient cases treated with BTM (57.7%) or IDRT (42.3%) during 2011-2022. RESULTS: The mean surgery time was significantly shorter in BTM cases (1.632 ± 0.571 hours) compared with IDRT cases (5.282 ± 5.102 hours, P = 0.011). Median postoperative hospital stay was notably shorter for BTM placement than IDRT placement (0.95 vs 6.60 days, P = 0.003). The median postoperative follow-up length approached a shorter duration in the BTM group (P = 0.054); however, median follow-up visits were significantly lower in the BTM group compared with the IDRT group (5 vs 14, P = 0.012). The median duration for complete wound closure was shorter for BTM (46.96 vs 118.91 days, P = 0.011). Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix demonstrated a notably lower infection rate (0.0%) compared with IDRT (36.4%, P = 0.022). Integra Dermal Regeneration Template exhibited higher wound hypertrophy rates (81.8%) than BTM (26.7%, P = 0.015). Revisionary surgeries were significantly more frequent in the BTM group (P < 0.001). Failed closure, defined as requiring one or more attempts, exhibited a significant difference, with a higher risk in the IDRT group (26.7%) compared with BTM (6.7%, P = 0.003). Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix showed a lower mean Vancouver Scar Scale adjusted fraction (0.279) compared with IDRT (0.639, P < 0.001). Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix incurred lower costs compared with IDRT but displayed a lower mean profit per square centimeter ($10.63 vs $22.53, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Economically, although the net profit per square centimeter of dermal template may favor IDRT, the ancillary benefits associated with BTM in terms of reduced hospital stay, shorter surgery times, fewer follow-up visits, and lower revisionary surgery rates contribute substantially to overall cost-effectiveness. Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix use reflects more efficient resource use and potential cost savings, aligning with broader trends in healthcare emphasizing value-based and patient-centered care.


Assuntos
Derme Acelular , Cirurgia Plástica , Animais , Humanos , Cicatrização , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estética , Transplante de Pele
2.
J Burn Care Res ; 45(1): 55-58, 2024 Jan 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37458696

RESUMO

While racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in burn care have been identified in the literature, there is a paucity of research into specific underlying causes of these disparities. Here, we sought to characterize whether time to initial burn consult might contribute to racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic differences in burn care outcomes. We performed a retrospective review of all patients evaluated by the burn surgery service at a single regional ABA-verified burn center between June 2020 and April 2022. Patients without data for the time of onset of burn injury were excluded. Time to burn consult was defined as the time from onset of burn injury to the time of first burn consult. Three hundred and sixty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Average age was 33.3 years, and 65.8% of patients were male. Average time to burn consult for all patients was 17 hours and 07 minutes. There were no significant differences in this variable among our cohort when stratified by race, ethnicity, or insurance status. Rates of surgical management (Chi-squared P = 0.05) and length of stay (ANOVA P < 0.0001) significantly differed by insurance status, but not among racial or ethnic groups. Medicare patients had the highest rates of surgical intervention and longer hospital stays; patients without insurance had the lowest rates of surgical intervention and shorter hospital stays. These results indicate that time from burn onset to burn consult is unlikely to contribute meaningfully to racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in burn care. Further studies are needed to better understand other aspects of burn care that may contribute to the noted disparities.


Assuntos
Queimaduras , Medicare , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Disparidades Socioeconômicas em Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Queimaduras/terapia
3.
BMC Geriatr ; 19(1): 62, 2019 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30823874

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Frail individuals are at risk of significant clinical deterioration if their frailty is not identified and managed appropriately. Research suggests that any interaction between an older person and a health or social care professional should include an assessment for frailty. Many older care home residents are frail when admitted, but we have little knowledge of whether or how this is assessed. The aim of this paper is to understand and establish the characteristics of the reported 'assessments for frailty' used in care homes with nursing (nursing homes) across North-West London. This will help understand what an 'assessment for frailty' of care home residents mean in practice in North-West London. METHODS: Telephone contact was made with every Care Quality Commission (CQC) (independent regulator of health and adult social care in England) regulated nursing home across North-West London [n = 87]. An online survey was sent to all that expressed interest [n = 73]. The survey was developed through conversations with healthcare professionals, based on literature and tested with academics and clinicians. Survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: 24/73 nursing homes completed the survey (33%). Differences in the characteristics of reported 'assessments for frailty' across nursing homes were evident. Variation in high level domains assessed (physical, social, mental and environmental) was observed. Nurses were the most common professional group completing assessments for frailty, with documentation and storage being predominantly paper based. A statistically significant difference between the number of assessments used in corporate chain owned nursing homes (3.9) versus independently owned nursing homes (2.1) was observed (U = 21, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Great variation existed in the characteristics of reported 'assessments for frailty' in nursing homes. Our study suggests that not all physical, social, mental and environmental domains of frailty are routinely assessed: it appears that frailty is still primarily viewed only in terms of physical health. The consequences of this could be severe for patients, staff and healthcare settings. Research illustrates that frailty is a broad, multifactorial health state and, as such, an overall 'assessment for frailty' should reflect this.


Assuntos
Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Avaliação Geriátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos , Casas de Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Profissional-Paciente
4.
Burns ; 45(1): 213-219, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30467036

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Self-inflicted burns are a rare cause of injury, accounting for only 1.0% of burns in the United States. While rare, the physical and psychosocial ramifications of these injuries are lasting. The goal of this study was to examine the etiologies, risk factors and outcomes of self-inflected burns in an urban setting. METHODS: Records of all patients presented to a regional burn center from July 2011 to June 2015 were reviewed. Those who sustained a self-inflected burn were identified and included in this study. Demographic data, psychiatric history, previous self-harm records, insurance status, injury circumstance, burn characteristic [location and total body surface area (TBSA)], need for excision and grafting, graft-take and duration of hospital stay and costs were reviewed. This group was then compared to a cohort of 166 patients with non-intentional burn during the same time frame matched for age and TBSA%. RESULTS: There were 34 patients with a mean (SD) age of 31 (15.2) who sustained a self-inflicted burn during the study period. The mean TBSA% was 2.8 (SD=5.1), with most injuries in the upper and lower extremities. Fifty three percent of the patients presented with altered mental status secondary to either psychiatric illness or intoxication. Twenty-four percent of incidents were claimed as suicide attempts and suicidal ideation was present in 47% of cases. Twenty-six percent of patients with a previous psychiatric diagnosis were not on a psychiatric medication prior to incident. There was record of previous self-harm in 26% of patients. When compared to control group of 166 patient with non-intentional burn, patients with self-inflicted burn had higher rates of substance abuse (35% vs. 13%, p<0.05), longer stay in the hospital (11.3 vs. 5.3 days, p<0.01), longer stay in the intensive care unit (1.8 vs. 0.2 days, p<0.01), and lower rates of insurance (15% vs. 42%, p<0.001). These patients also exhibited a higher need for excision and grafting (41% vs. 20%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with self-inflected burn have a higher rate of previous self-harm behavior, psychiatric comorbidities and substance abuse. These patients are more likely to require surgical excision and grafting and expanded institutional resources compared to those with non-intentional burn with similar degree and size of burn. Increased counseling of at-risk populations may help to decrease this potentially preventable method of injury.


Assuntos
Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Superfície Corporal , Queimaduras/economia , Queimaduras/psicologia , Queimaduras/terapia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/economia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/psicologia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/terapia , Transplante de Pele/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Ideação Suicida , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
5.
Burns ; 43(3): 490-494, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28256293

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The vacuum assisted closure device (VAC) improves wound-healing when utilized as a bolster to secure split thickness skin grafts (STSG). Patients typically remain hospitalized for VAC therapy; however, home VACs (hVAC) are now available. Limited studies examine burns treated with hVAC as a STSG bolster. METHOD: A retrospective study of records from an ABA verified regional burn center was conducted over 23 months. Patients included STSGs for burn. Data points included demographics, burn mechanism and location, graft characteristics, hospital length of stay (LOS), and time to heal. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Fifty patients were included, with average age of 39 years (range <1-83years). Average burn TBSA was 1.27±1.42 (range 0.05-8.18). Grafted area average was 102.9±128.1cm2. The most commonly treated areas were the leg/foot, thigh, and torso (53%, 16%, and 16%, respectively). Average LOS was 1.1±1.2 days. Mean graft-take was 99.2±2.8% with one patient undergoing repeat STSG. Average post-operative time to heal was 16±6 days. A 5-day inpatient stay with a VAC costs an average of $34,635, compared to $9134 for an hVAC over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: The hVAC is a cost-effective STSG bolster in the burn population for appropriate candidates. Excellent graft-take and low morbidity rates imply that this is an efficacious alternative for STSG bolster.


Assuntos
Queimaduras/terapia , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/métodos , Transplante de Pele , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Superfície Corporal , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Lactente , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização , Adulto Jovem
6.
BMJ Open ; 6(10): e012904, 2016 10 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27742633

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We seek to address gaps in knowledge and agreement around optimal frailty assessment in the acute medical care setting. Frailty is a common term describing older persons who are at increased risk of developing multimorbidity, disability, institutionalisation and death. Consensus has not been reached on the practical implementation of this concept to assess clinically and manage older persons in the acute care setting. DESIGN: Modified Delphi, via electronic questionnaire. Questions included ranking items that best recognise frailty, optimal timing, location and contextual elements of a successful tool. Intraclass correlation coefficients for overall levels of agreement, with consensus and stability tested by 2-way ANOVA with absolute agreement and Fisher's exact test. PARTICIPANTS: A panel of national experts (academics, front-line clinicians and specialist charities) were invited to electronic correspondence. RESULTS: Variables reflecting accumulated deficit and high resource usage were perceived by participants as the most useful indicators of frailty in the acute care setting. The Acute Medical Unit and Care of the older Persons Ward were perceived as optimum settings for frailty assessment. 'Clinically meaningful and relevant', 'simple (easy to use)' and 'accessible by multidisciplinary team' were perceived as characteristics of a successful frailty assessment tool in the acute care setting. No agreement was reached on optimal timing, number of variables and organisational structures. CONCLUSIONS: This study is a first step in developing consensus for a clinically relevant frailty assessment model for the acute care setting, providing content validation and illuminating contextual requirements. Testing on clinical data sets is a research priority.


Assuntos
Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Idoso , Comorbidade , Cuidados Críticos , Avaliação da Deficiência , Humanos , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto
7.
BMJ Open ; 6(6): e010669, 2016 06 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27288372

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe hospital inpatient, emergency department (ED) and outpatient department (OPD) activity for patients in the year following their first emergency admission for heart failure (HF). To assess the proportion receiving specialist assessment within 2 weeks of hospital discharge, as now recommended by guidelines. DESIGN: Observational study of national administrative data. SETTING: All acute NHS hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: 82 241 patients with an index emergency admission between April 2009 and March 2011 with a primary diagnosis of HF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiology OPD appointment within 2 weeks and within a year of discharge from the index admission; emergency department (ED) and inpatient use within a year. RESULTS: 15.1% died during the admission. Of the 69 848 survivors, 19.7% were readmitted within 30 days and half within a year, the majority for non-HF diagnoses. 6.7% returned to the ED within a week of discharge, of whom the majority (77.6%) were admitted. The two most common OPD specialties during the year were cardiology (24.7% of the total appointments) and anticoagulant services (12.5%). Although half of all patients had a cardiology appointment within a year, the proportion within the recommended 2 weeks of discharge was just 6.8% overall and varied by age, from 2.4% in those aged 90+ to 19.6% in those aged 18-45 (p<0.0001); appointments in other specialties made up only some of the shortfall. More comorbidity at any age was associated with higher rates of cardiology OPD follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HF are high users of hospital services. Postdischarge cardiology OPD follow-up rates fell well below current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines, particularly for the elderly and those with less comorbidity.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/economia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde
8.
Health Technol Assess ; 19(97): i-xxv, 1-150, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26597979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) is recommended in international guidance for the resuscitation of patients presenting with early septic shock. However, adoption has been limited and uncertainty remains over its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to estimate the effect of EGDT compared with usual resuscitation on mortality at 90 days following randomisation and on incremental cost-effectiveness at 1 year. The secondary objectives were to compare EGDT with usual resuscitation for requirement for, and duration of, critical care unit organ support; length of stay in the emergency department (ED), critical care unit and acute hospital; health-related quality of life, resource use and costs at 90 days and at 1 year; all-cause mortality at 28 days, at acute hospital discharge and at 1 year; and estimated lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness. DESIGN: A pragmatic, open, multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with an integrated economic evaluation. SETTING: Fifty-six NHS hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1260 patients who presented at EDs with septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: EGDT (n = 630) or usual resuscitation (n = 630). Patients were randomly allocated 1 : 1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality at 90 days after randomisation and incremental net benefit (at £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year) at 1 year. RESULTS: Following withdrawals, data on 1243 (EGDT, n = 623; usual resuscitation, n = 620) patients were included in the analysis. By 90 days, 184 (29.5%) in the EGDT and 181 (29.2%) patients in the usual-resuscitation group had died [p = 0.90; absolute risk reduction -0.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.4 to 4.7; relative risk 1.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.20]. Treatment intensity was greater for the EGDT group, indicated by the increased use of intravenous fluids, vasoactive drugs and red blood cell transfusions. Increased treatment intensity was reflected by significantly higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and more advanced cardiovascular support days in critical care for the EGDT group. At 1 year, the incremental net benefit for EGDT versus usual resuscitation was negative at -£725 (95% CI -£3000 to £1550). The probability that EGDT was more cost-effective than usual resuscitation was below 30%. There were no significant differences in any other secondary outcomes, including health-related quality of life, or adverse events. LIMITATIONS: Recruitment was lower at weekends and out of hours. The intervention could not be blinded. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality at 90 days for EGDT compared with usual resuscitation among adults identified with early septic shock presenting to EDs in England. On average, costs were higher in the EGDT group than in the usual-resuscitation group while quality-adjusted life-years were similar in both groups; the probability that it is cost-effective is < 30%. FUTURE WORK: The ProMISe (Protocolised Management In Sepsis) trial completes the planned trio of evaluations of EGDT across the USA, Australasia and England; all have indicated that EGDT is not superior to usual resuscitation. Recognising that each of the three individual, large trials has limited power for evaluating potentially important subgroups, the harmonised approach adopted provides the opportunity to conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis, enhancing both knowledge and generalisability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN36307479. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 19, No. 97. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


Assuntos
Ressuscitação/métodos , Choque Séptico/terapia , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Inglaterra , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Ressuscitação/economia , Choque Séptico/economia , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 15: 86, 2015 Oct 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26466787

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although policy discourses frame integrated Electronic Health Records (EHRs) as essential for contemporary healthcare systems, increased information sharing often raises concerns among patients and the public. This paper examines patient and public views about the security and privacy of EHRs used for health provision, research and policy in the UK. METHODS: Sequential mixed methods study with a cross-sectional survey (in 2011) followed by focus group discussions (in 2012-2013). Survey participants (N = 5331) were recruited from primary and secondary care settings in West London (UK). Complete data for 2761 (51.8 %) participants were included in the final analysis for this paper. The survey results were discussed in 13 focus groups with people living with a range of different health conditions, and in 4 mixed focus groups with patients, health professionals and researchers (total N = 120). Qualitative data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: In the survey, 79 % of participants reported that they would worry about the security of their record if this was part of a national EHR system and 71 % thought the National Health Service (NHS) was unable to guarantee EHR safety at the time this work was carried out. Almost half (47 %) responded that EHRs would be less secure compared with the way their health record was held at the time of the survey. Of those who reported being worried about EHR security, many would nevertheless support their development (55 %), while 12 % would not support national EHRs and a sizeable proportion (33 %) were undecided. There were also variations by age, ethnicity and education. In focus group discussions participants weighed up perceived benefits against potential security and privacy threats from wider sharing of information, as well as discussing other perceived risks: commercial exploitation, lack of accountability, data inaccuracies, prejudice and inequalities in health provision. CONCLUSIONS: Patient and public worries about the security risks associated with integrated EHRs highlight the need for intensive public awareness and engagement initiatives, together with the establishment of trustworthy security and privacy mechanisms for health information sharing.


Assuntos
Segurança Computacional/normas , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/normas , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Privacidade , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Adulto Jovem
10.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 136(1): 96e-105e, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26111337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The current state of employment satisfaction in plastic surgery has not been defined. Similarly, the factors influencing residents as they search for employment and the role of attending surgeons as mentors in this process have not been elicited. The authors aim to elucidate these measures through a survey of attending surgeons and senior residents. METHODS: A survey was created assessing employment satisfaction and was distributed to members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons with available contact information. Responses were analyzed, with values of p < 0.05 deemed significant. RESULTS: A total of 616 plastic surgeons and senior plastic surgery residents responded. Compared with attending surgeons in private practice, those in academic practice were more satisfied with their case mix (p = 0.0005; OR, not significant) and less satisfied with their incentive structure (p = 0.0001; OR, 0.3155) and payor mix (p = 0.0005; OR, 0.6156). Employment change occurred in 225 surgeons (39.2 percent) since beginning practice. Surgeons that changed employment ranked base salary (p = 0.0031), earning potential (p = 0.0001), and incentive structure (p = 0.0001) as most important. Those that did not change employment ranked lifestyle (p = 0.0048), location (p = 0.0001), and desire to teach (p = 0.0002) as more important. Residents ranked location (p = 0.0030), desired case mix (p = 0.0131), and desire or lack of desire to teach residents (p = 0.0329) as more important than attending surgeons felt they should be, and guaranteed salary (p = 0.0178) and incentive structure (p = 0.0069) as less important. CONCLUSIONS: In an evolving health care environment, plastic surgeons' employment satisfaction is significantly dependent on a myriad of factors. Residents and their attending mentors differ significantly in perceived importance of these factors.


Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Internato e Residência , Satisfação no Emprego , Cirurgia Plástica , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Coleta de Dados , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Salários e Benefícios , Cirurgia Plástica/economia , Cirurgia Plástica/educação , Estados Unidos
11.
BMJ Open ; 5(5): e006103, 2015 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25995234

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify patient and treatment factors that affect clinical outcomes of community psychological therapy through the development of a predictive model using historic data from 2 services in London. In addition, the study aims to assess the completeness of data collection, explore how treatment outcomes are discriminated using current criteria for classifying recovery, and assess the feasibility and need for undertaking a future larger population analysis. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective discriminant analysis. SETTING: 2 London community mental health services that provide psychological therapies for common mental disorders including anxiety and depression. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7388 patients attended the services between February 2009 and May 2012, of which 4393 (59%) completed therapy, or there was an agreement to end therapy, and were included in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Different combinations of the clinical outcome scores for anxiety Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 and depression Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were used to construct different treatment outcomes. RESULTS: The predictive models were able to assign a positive or negative clinical outcome to each patient based on 5 independent pre-treatment variables, with an accuracy of 69.4% and 79.3%, respectively: initial severity of anxiety and depression, ethnicity, deprivation and gender. The number of sessions attended/missed were also important factors identified in recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Predicting whether patients are likely to have a positive outcome following treatment at entry might allow suitable modification of scheduled treatment, possibly resulting in improvements in outcomes. The model also highlights factors not only associated with poorer outcomes but inextricably linked to prevalence of common mental disorders, emphasising the importance of social determinants not only in poor health but also poor recovery.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Ansiedade/terapia , Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental , Depressão/terapia , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Psicoterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Características de Residência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
12.
N Engl J Med ; 372(14): 1301-11, 2015 Apr 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25776532

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early, goal-directed therapy (EGDT) is recommended in international guidelines for the resuscitation of patients presenting with early septic shock. However, adoption has been limited, and uncertainty about its effectiveness remains. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic randomized trial with an integrated cost-effectiveness analysis in 56 hospitals in England. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either EGDT (a 6-hour resuscitation protocol) or usual care. The primary clinical outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. RESULTS: We enrolled 1260 patients, with 630 assigned to EGDT and 630 to usual care. By 90 days, 184 of 623 patients (29.5%) in the EGDT group and 181 of 620 patients (29.2%) in the usual-care group had died (relative risk in the EGDT group, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.20; P=0.90), for an absolute risk reduction in the EGDT group of -0.3 percentage points (95% CI, -5.4 to 4.7). Increased treatment intensity in the EGDT group was indicated by increased use of intravenous fluids, vasoactive drugs, and red-cell transfusions and reflected by significantly worse organ-failure scores, more days receiving advanced cardiovascular support, and longer stays in the intensive care unit. There were no significant differences in any other secondary outcomes, including health-related quality of life, or in rates of serious adverse events. On average, EGDT increased costs, and the probability that it was cost-effective was below 20%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with septic shock who were identified early and received intravenous antibiotics and adequate fluid resuscitation, hemodynamic management according to a strict EGDT protocol did not lead to an improvement in outcome. (Funded by the United Kingdom National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme; ProMISe Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN36307479.).


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Transfusão de Sangue , Hidratação , Ressuscitação/métodos , Choque Séptico/terapia , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos Clínicos , Terapia Combinada , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ressuscitação/economia , Choque Séptico/mortalidade
13.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 26(2): 198-204, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24521701

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate equity of patient outcomes in a psychological therapy service, following increased access achieved by a quality improvement (QI) initiative. DESIGN: Retrospective service evaluation of health outcomes; data analysed by ANOVA, chi-squared and Statistical Process Control. SETTING: A psychological therapy service in Westminster, London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: People living in the Borough of Westminster, London, attending the service (from either healthcare professional or self-referral) between February 2009 and May 2012. INTERVENTION: s) Social marketing interventions were used to increase referrals, including the promotion of the service through local media and through existing social networks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: s) (i) Severity of depression on entry using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9). (ii) Changes to severity of depression following treatment (ΔPHQ9). (iii) Changes in attainment of a meaningful improvement in condition assessed by a key performance indicator. RESULTS: Patients from areas of high deprivation entered the service with more severe depression (M = 15.47, SD = 6.75), compared with patients from areas of low (M = 13.20, SD = 6.75) and medium (M = 14.44, SD = 6.64) deprivation. Patients in low, medium and high deprivation areas attained similar changes in depression score (ΔPHQ9: M = -6.60, SD = 6.41). Similar proportions of patients achieved the key performance indicator across initiative phase and deprivation categories. CONCLUSIONS: QI methods improved access to mental health services; this paper finds no evidence for differences in clinical outcomes in patients, regardless of level of deprivation, interpreted as no evidence of inequity in the service with respect to this outcome.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Marketing de Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
14.
Ann Plast Surg ; 72(1): 23-9, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24346219

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammaplasty (RM) is generally thought of as a reconstructive procedure, frequently but variably reimbursed by third-party payers. The purpose of this study was to assess US plastic surgeons' opinions of and interactions with the insurance coverage environment surrounding the reimbursement of RM. METHODS: The RM policies of 15 regional and nationwide health insurance carriers were analyzed. A survey regarding RM was distributed to all members of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and subsequently analyzed. RESULTS: Most insurance carriers require a minimum resection weight, a minimum age, and a conservative therapy trial. A total of 757 surgeons responded to our survey. Seventy-six percent of the respondents believe that only some RM procedures should be covered by insurance. Sixty-four percent feel that symptoms are the most important factor in the surgeon's determination of medical necessity. Fifty-seven percent state that a breast resection weight of 500 g or greater is required for coverage in their region. Seventy-one percent believe that this weight should be less than 500 g per breast. If the surgeon estimates that he/she will remove 500 g per breast, the minimum weight for coverage, 61% of the surgeons would have patients sign a statement of liability for payment. If the intraoperative resection weight is inadequate, 45.6% would not remove additional tissue, risking nonpayment; 32.7% would complete the procedure and inform the patient that payment is out-of-pocket. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance reimbursement for RM varies in approval by carrier. Surgeons believe that signs and symptoms of macromastia determine medical necessity, whereas insurance carriers place a larger emphasis on resection weights.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Mama/anormalidades , Hipertrofia/cirurgia , Cobertura do Seguro , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Mamoplastia/economia , Cirurgia Plástica/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Hipertrofia/economia , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
15.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 35(4): 510-7, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24169414

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a cause of frequent emergency readmissions. We examined trends in SCD emergency readmissions and inpatient mortality in England in relation to socio-economic status. METHODS: Data from Hospital Episode Statistics were extracted for all SCD patients admitted in 2005/06. The financial year 2005/06 was taken as the index year for analysis. We calculated readmission rates and inpatient mortality for patients admitted with a primary or secondary diagnosis of sickle cell anaemia with crisis and without crisis in the index year during the subsequent 5 years (2006/07-2010/11). Charlson Score was used to measure comorbidity. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we also examined the relationship between patient characteristics and both emergency readmissions and inpatient mortality. RESULTS: In 2005/06, there were 7679 SCD index admissions. Over the subsequent 5-year period, patients living in the most socio-economically deprived areas were at highest risk of readmission (54.2% readmitted over the study period compared with 28% of the least deprived group). Inpatient mortality amongst readmissions was highest in patients living in the most deprived areas [hazard ratio (HR) 2.34, 95% CI 1.41-3.90]. CONCLUSION: SCD patients from the most socio-economically deprived areas and with comorbidities are at highest risk of both SCD readmissions and in-hospital mortality, suggesting that there are inequalities in healthcare access and health outcomes amongst people with SCD.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/mortalidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
16.
Emerg Med J ; 30(3): e22, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22518060

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the process of emergency care waiting in England has changed following the modification of the operational standard for the 4 h waiting time target from 98% to 95% in June 2010. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of publicly available 'total time spent in accident and emergency' data from Department of Health. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients attending emergency departments (EDs) in England between October 2002 and September 2011. In 2005, the government set an operational standard that 98% of patients should wait <4 h in ED. In June 2010, the government announced that the operating standard would change to 95% immediately. OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage of patients waiting <4 h (weekly and quarterly), and total number of patients waiting >4 h. RESULTS: The average percentage of patients waiting <4 h fell from 98% to 95% almost immediately following the operational standard change. Consequently, between October 2010 and September 2011, approximately 383 000 additional patients in England EDs waited in excess of 4 h than had the 98% standard been attained. The emergency care system appears to have been stabilised at this new level. CONCLUSIONS: The policy change for waiting times in EDs in England has resulted in the process of emergency care in England adjusting to the new operational standard of 95% of patients waiting <4 h. As a result, more patients are waiting >4 h to receive the care they need; consequently, outcomes are likely to suffer.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Listas de Espera , Inglaterra , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Política Organizacional , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicina Estatal , Fatores de Tempo
17.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 12: 40, 2012 May 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22621621

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immediate access to patients' complete health records via electronic databases could improve healthcare and facilitate health research. However, the possible benefits of a national electronic health records (EHR) system must be balanced against public concerns about data security and personal privacy. Successful development of EHR requires better understanding of the views of the public and those most affected by EHR: users of the National Health Service. This study aims to explore the correlation between personal healthcare experience (including number of healthcare contacts and number and type of longer term conditions) and views relating to development of EHR for healthcare, health services planning and policy and health research. METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-site cross-sectional self-complete questionnaire designed and piloted for use in waiting rooms was administered to patients from randomly selected outpatients' clinics at a university teaching hospital (431 beds) and general practice surgeries from the four primary care trusts within the catchment area of the hospital. All patients entering the selected outpatients clinics and general practice surgeries were invited to take part in the survey during August-September 2011. Statistical analyses will be conducted using descriptive techniques to present respondents' overall views about electronic health records and logistic regression to explore associations between these views and participants' personal circumstances, experiences, sociodemographics and more specific views about electronic health records. DISCUSSION: The study design and implementation were successful, resulting in unusually high response rates and overall recruitment (85.5%, 5336 responses). Rates for face-to-face recruitment in previous work are variable, but typically lower (mean 76.7%, SD 20). We discuss details of how we collected the data to provide insight into how we obtained this unusually high response rate.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Pacientes/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Área Programática de Saúde , Análise por Conglomerados , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Política de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Londres , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos Piloto , Opinião Pública , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Listas de Espera
20.
Thorax ; 66(3): 191-6, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21076143

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospital admission rates for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are known to be strongly associated with population factors. Primary care services may also affect admission rates, but there is little direct supporting evidence. OBJECTIVES: To determine associations between population characteristics, diagnosed and undiagnosed COPD prevalence, primary healthcare factors, and COPD admission rates primary care trust (PCT) and general practice levels in England. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: National cross-sectional study (53,676,051 patients in 8,064 practices in 152 English PCTs), combining data on hospital admissions, populations, primary healthcare staffing, clinical practice quality and access, and prevalence. Main outcome measures Directly and indirectly standardised hospital admission rates for COPD, for PCT and practice populations. RESULTS: Mean annual COPD admission rates per 100,000 population varied from 124.7 to 646.5 for PCTs and 0.0 to 2175.2 for practices. Admissions were strongly associated with population deprivation at both levels. In a practice-level multivariate Poisson regression, registered and undiagnosed COPD prevalence, smoking prevalence and deprivation were risk factors for admission (p < 0.001), while healthcare factors- influenza immunisation, patient-reported access to consultations within two days, and primary care staffing, were protective (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Associations of COPD admission rates with deprivation, primary healthcare access and supply highlight the need for adequate services in deprived areas. An association between admission rates and undiagnosed COPD prevalence suggests that case-finding strategies should be evaluated. Of the COPD clinical quality indicators, only influenza immunisation was associated with reduced admission rates. Patients' experience of access to primary care may also be clinically important.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/organização & administração , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/etiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA