RESUMO
Since it was initially described in 1992 laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has been gaining popularity amongst urologists and its range of applications has progressively widened. Ten years after the first report of LA this type of operation is presently considered to be the 'standard of care' for most adrenal diseases requiring surgery. We define the current role of laparoscopy in the management of surgical adrenal diseases, using a Medline search (1997-2002) to assess reports of LA, focusing on indications, approaches (transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic) and comparative analyses, taking particular care to evaluate operative duration, rate of conversion and transfusion, complications and hospital stay. With both approaches LA is safe and effective and, when compared with open surgery, offers the same functional results with all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. We conclude that LA based on either approach should be considered the treatment of choice for benign adrenal lesions. Although very promising, conservative surgery and LA should still be evaluated in cases of malignancy.
Assuntos
Adrenalectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Doenças das Glândulas Suprarrenais/economia , Adrenalectomia/economia , Contraindicações , Custos e Análise de Custo , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Previsões , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economiaRESUMO
Nowadays, the minimally invasive treatment of symptomatic renal cyst has been progressively gaining wide acceptance while classic open surgery has been almost abandoned. It is a still controversial which minimally invasive approach provides the major advantages and results. Fifty-two patients with symptomatic simple renal cyst underwent ultrasound guided percutaneous drainage and sclerotherapy (ethanol 95 degrees) and 20 patients underwent laparoscopic unroofing of simple renal cysts in our department. No major complication was recorded with both the techniques. Even if we reported a higher recurrence rate (82%) with sclerotherapy than that with laparoscopic treatment (5%) we consider the percutaneous drainage a valid approach because it is a safe, easy and at low cost procedure.