Consent for Genetic Biobanking in a Diverse Multisite CKD Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study was to examine patterns in the likelihood of consent to genetic research among participants in a prospective kidney disease cohort and biobank, and to determine demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors linked to consent for ongoing and future genetic research. METHODS: The Clinical Phenotyping Resource and Biobank Core (C-PROBE) enrolled 1628 adult and pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease from 2009 to 2017 across 7 sites in the United States. Participants were asked at annual study visits for consent to provide DNA samples for future genetic studies. We compared characteristics of participants by initial consent outcome and consent status at their most recent study visit. RESULTS: Of the C-PROBE participants, 96% consented to genetic studies at their initial study visit. Although African Americans were slightly less likely to consent at baseline (93% vs. 97%, odds ratio = 0.3, P < 0.02), there were no significant racial or ethnic differences with longitudinal participation. Also, pediatric and adult genetic consent rates were equivalent. The major persistent differences in the likelihood of consent were based on enrollment site, which ranged from 85% to 100% (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Overall, genetic consent rates for kidney research within the C-PROBE cohort were high. However, differences in consent rates over time and by recruitment site highlight the complexity of genetic consent for biobanking, and potential limitations for generalizability of observations.

Low socioeconomic status associates with higher serum phosphate irrespective of race.

Hyperphosphatemia, which associates with adverse outcomes in CKD, is more common among blacks than whites for unclear reasons. Low socioeconomic status may explain this association because poverty both disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minorities and promotes excess intake of relatively inexpensive processed and fast foods enriched with highly absorbable phosphorus additives. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of race, socioeconomic status, and serum phosphate among 2879 participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study. Participants with the lowest incomes or who were unemployed had higher serum phosphate concentrations than participants with the highest incomes or who were employed (P < 0.001). Although we also observed differences in serum phosphate levels by race, income modified this relationship: Blacks had 0.11 to 0.13 mg/dl higher serum phosphate than whites in the highest income groups but there was no difference by race in the lowest income group. In addition, compared with whites with the highest income, both blacks and whites with the lowest incomes had more than twice the likelihood of hyperphosphatemia in multivariable-adjusted analysis. In conclusion, low socioeconomic status associates with higher serum phosphate concentrations irrespective of race. Given the association between higher levels of serum phosphate and cardiovascular disease, further studies will need to determine whether excess serum phosphate may explain disparities in kidney disease outcomes among minority populations and the poor.