Saliva microRNA signature to diagnose endometriosis: A cost-effectiveness evaluation of the Endotest®.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a saliva diagnostic test (Endotest®) for endometriosis compared with the conventional algorithm. DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness analysis with a decision-tree model based on literature data. SETTING: France. POPULATION: Women with chronic pelvic pain. METHODS: Strategy I is the French algorithm, representing the comparator. For strategy II, all patients have an Endotest®. For strategy III, patients undergo ultrasonography to detect endometrioma and patients with no endometrioma detected have an Endotest®. For strategy IV, patients with no endometrioma detected on ultrasonography undergo pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect endometrioma and/or deep endometriosis. An Endotest® is then performed for patients with a negative result on MRI. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Costs and accuracy rates and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Three analyses were performed with an Endotest® priced at €500, €750, and €1000. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted with Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: With an Endotest® priced at €750, the cost per correctly diagnosed case was €1542, €990, €919 and €1000, respectively, for strategies I, II, III and IV. Strategy I was dominated by all other strategies. Strategies IV, III and II were, respectively, preferred for a willingness-to-pay threshold below €473, between €473 and €4670, and beyond €4670 per correctly diagnosed case. At a price of €500 per Endotest®, strategy I was dominated by all other strategies. At €1000, the ICERs of strategies II and III were €724 and €387 per correctly diagnosed case, respectively, compared with strategy I. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates the value of the Endotest® from an economic perspective.

Use of the EFI score in endometriosis-associated infertility: A cost-effectiveness study.

BACKGROUND: The management of endometriosis-related infertility is still under debate. The Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) score is performant to predict the occurrence of a spontaneous pregnancy following surgery, but was not evaluated in a cost-effectiveness perspective. Our objective was to quantify fertility outcomes, and costs of different care pathways for endometriosis-associated infertility after primary surgery, with a stratification on the EFI score. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a decision-tree model in a Tertiary-care university hospital. Extracted form a prospectively maintained database, 608 patients with endometriosis-associated infertility, who underwent laparoscopic treatment with an evaluation of the EFI score, were discriminated between different strategies: natural conception, immediate IVF-ICSI, delayed IVF-ICSI. The pregnancy rate and the live birth rate were the effectiveness outcomes. We considered direct and indirect costs in each strategies. The analysis was stratified according to the EFI score. RESULTS: After surgery, 163 women with immediate IVF-ICSI (strategy I) were compared with 445 women who had natural conception attempts during a year (strategy II). After a year failure of natural conception attempts, 133 women continuing natural conception attempts (strategy III) were compared with 168 women who had delayed IVF-ICSI (strategy IV). The respective PR and LBR were 62.6 % and 52.1 % for strategy I, and 32.4 % and 23.8 % for strategy II. Compared to strategy II, strategy I was more costly and more effective (Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER): 31,469 €/pregnancy and 33,568 €/live birth)). No added benefit was observed for patients in strategy I with an EFI score [0-3] after two IVF-ICSI cycles. Strategy III was strongly dominant versus strategy IV for patients with an EFI score [9-10]. Compared to strategy III, strategy VI was more costly and more effective (ICER: 79,674 €/pregnancy, 53,188 €/pregnancy and 27,748 €/pregnancy respectively for patients with an EFI score [7-8], [4-6] and [0-3]). CONCLUSION: Immediate IVF-ICSI after surgery is effective but associated with substantial costs for the healthcare system. Taking into account healthcare costs, the EFI is a useful score for helping a couple decide between different care pathways -natural conception, immediate or delayed IVF-ICSI- after surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility.

Impact of hospital and surgeon case volume on morbidity in colorectal endometriosis management: a plea to define criteria for expert centers.

National and international guidelines recommend referring patients with severe forms of endometriosis to expert centers. However, there is a lack of clear criteria to define an expert center. We examined the roles of surgeon and hospital procedure volumes as determinants of morbidity in deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum and sigmoid colon (DIERS). METHODS: We conducted a French retrospective multicenter study of hospital facilities performing colorectal surgery for DIERS in 2015. The primary end point was to analyze the relation between case volume and the incidence of complications. We estimated the optimal cut-off (OCO) determined by a minimal p-value approach. RESULTS: The study included 56 hospital facilities and collected data of 1135 cases of surgical management of colorectal endometriosis. The mean and median number of procedures per year and per surgeon were 9.17 and 5.58, respectively. The overall rate of grade III-V complication was 7.6% (82/1135). One grade V complication occurred. The rates of rectovaginal fistula, anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, and ureteral fistula were: 2.7% (31/1135), 0.79% (9/1135), 3.4% (39/1135), and 0.70% (8/1135), respectively. An OCO of 20 procedures per center and per year (p < 0.001) was defined. The OCO per surgeon and per year varied between seven (p = 0.007) and 13 procedures (p = 0.03). In a multivariate analysis, we found that only the volume of activity was independently correlated to complication outcomes (p = 0.0013). CONCLUSION: Our results contribute to providing objective morbidity data to determine criteria for defining expert centers for colorectal surgery for endometriosis.