Comparative assessment of image quality for coronary CT angiography with iobitridol and two contrast agents with higher iodine concentrations: iopromide and iomeprol. A multicentre randomized double-blind trial.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate non-inferiority of iobitridol 350 for coronary CT angiography (CTA) compared to higher iodine content contrast media regarding rate of patients evaluable for the presence of coronary artery stenoses. METHODS: In this multicentre trial, 452 patients were randomized to receive iobitridol 350, iopromide 370 or iomeprol 400 and underwent coronary CTA using CT systems with 64-detector rows or more. Two core lab readers assessed 18 coronary segments per patient regarding image quality (score 0 = non diagnostic to 4 = excellent quality), vascular attenuation, signal and contrast to noise ratio (SNR, CNR). Patients were considered evaluable if no segment had a score of 0. RESULTS: Per-patient, the rate of fully evaluable CT scans was 92.1, 95.4 and 94.6 % for iobitridol, iopromide and iomeprol, respectively. Non-inferiority of iobitridol over the best comparator was demonstrated with a 95 % CI of the difference of [-8.8 to 2.1], with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -10 %. Although average attenuation increased with higher iodine concentrations, average SNR and CNR did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: With current CT technology, iobitridol 350 mg iodine/ml is not inferior to contrast media with higher iodine concentrations in terms of image quality for coronary stenosis assessment. KEY POINTS: • Iodine concentration is an important parameter for image quality in coronary CTA. • Contrast enhancement must be balanced against the amount of iodine injected. • Iobitridol 350 is non-inferior compared to CM with higher iodine concentrations. • Higher attenuation with higher iodine concentrations, but no SNR or CNR differences.

Waiting time prioritisation for specialist services in Italy: the homogeneous waiting time groups approach.

The demand for referrals and diagnostic procedures in Italy has been rising constantly in recent years, making access to diagnostic services increasingly difficult with significant waiting times. A number of Health Authorities (known as Local Health Units) have responded by implementing formalised waiting-time prioritisation tools, giving rise to what are known as Homogeneous Waiting Groups (HWGs). The study describes the implementation of the HWG approach in Italy. This represents a promising tool for improving the prioritisation of patients waiting to see a specialist or to receive a diagnostic test. The study of the Italian HWG experience provides useful insights to improve the outpatient referral process for those countries where the demand prioritisation policies have focused more on inpatient care than outpatient specialist care and diagnostic services.

High-resolution MRI of carotid plaque with a neurovascular coil and contrast-enhanced MR angiography: one-stop shopping for the comprehensive assessment of carotid atherosclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess a protocol of study of carotid atherosclerosis coupling vascular wall imaging and luminal imaging in the same examination and to evaluate the accuracy of high-resolution MRI with a neurovascular coil in carotid plaque characterization. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients with 34 carotid artery stenoses were prospectively enrolled. MRI was performed on a 1.5-T unit. Plaque assessment was performed starting with a diffusion-weighted sequence and followed by a fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequence; after contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA), all patients were evaluated with a T1-weighted 3D high-resolution sequence. Carotid plaques were classified as type A, having a large lipid-necrotic core; type B, being a complex fibrotic-calcified plaque with soft content (mixed plaque); or type C, being a fibrotic-calcified plaque (hard). Additional features indicative of vulnerable plaque such as intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), ulceration, and severe stenosis were registered. MR findings were compared with surgical specimens. RESULTS: MRI correctly identified 11 of 13 type A, eight of 11 type B, and eight of 10 type C plaques (sensitivity, 84.6%, 72.7%, and 80%, respectively). In the identification of lipid-necrotic core plaque, MRI showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.6%, 100%, 100%, and 91.3%, respectively (κ = 0.87). For reordering all plaques in two groups (i.e., soft vs nonsoft) in the identification of soft plaques, MRI had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 83.3%, 80%, 90.9%, and 66.7%, respectively (κ = 0.59). IPH, ulcers, and severe stenosis were detected in eight of eight, 11 of 13, and 25 of 25 cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with carotid atherosclerosis, ongoing CE-MRA with a neurovascular coil for the simultaneous detection of unstable plaques is feasible. Our MR protocol accurately identifies the major features of vulnerable plaque.