Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 13(7): 806-13, 2007 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17580258

RESUMO

A double-blind, randomized trial showed that, compared with placebo, palifermin (recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor) reduced the frequency and duration of oral mucositis in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and total-body irradiation with autologous stem-cell support. This previously published study also showed a significant reduction in the incidence of adverse subsequent outcomes. The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of palifermin prophylaxis on hospital costs of transplantation in the trial. This was a retrospective, economic analysis of estimated costs for a previously published clinical trial. Costs were not collected during the trial. Therefore, we estimated the direct medical costs of hospitalization using hospital charges from similar patients' hospitalization charges selected from the National Inpatient Sample, a population-based, nationally representative sample of hospital claims. Costs were estimated from charges using Medicare's state-specific cost-to-charge ratios. These cost estimates were applied to the outcome data (incidence of febrile neutropenia, bacteremia/fungemia, or pneumonia, and use of total parenteral nutrition) from the clinical trial. Patients were those with hematologic malignancies who received high-dose chemotherapy and total-body irradiation with autologous stem cell transplant. We compared the estimated total hospital costs (in 2005 United States dollars) incurred by patients who received palifermin in the clinical trial with those incurred by patients who received placebo. Costs were analyzed from the provider's perspective. The mean cost of a hospital day in this population varied between $2,834, when no adverse outcomes occurred, and $4,663, when all 4 outcomes occurred. Reductions in adverse outcomes and their associated hospital stay offset the acquisition price of palifermin. A nonsignificant mean savings of $3,595 per patient (95% confidence interval: $2,090-$5,103) was observed. In sensitivity analyses, this observation was robust to all plausible values of per diem hospital costs and hypothetic per diem outpatient costs. In addition to its previously demonstrated clinical benefit, palifermin prophylaxis offers a favorable economic profile among patients with hematologic malignancies who receive total body irradiation and autologous stem cell support.


Assuntos
Fator 7 de Crescimento de Fibroblastos/economia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/economia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Adulto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Fator 7 de Crescimento de Fibroblastos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/economia , Estomatite/economia , Estomatite/prevenção & controle , Transplante Autólogo , Estados Unidos , Irradiação Corporal Total/economia
3.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 9(1): 4-37, 2003 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12533739

RESUMO

Evidence supporting the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in the therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) is presented and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published medical literature and for grading the quality of the evidence, the strength of the evidence, and the strength of the treatment recommendations. Treatment recommendations based on the evidence presented in the review were made unanimously by a panel of MM experts. Recommendations for SCT as an effective therapy for MM include the following: SCT is preferred to standard chemotherapy as de novo therapy; SCT is preferred as de novo rather than salvage therapy; autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is preferred to bone marrow transplantation (BMT); and melphalan is preferred to melphalan plus total body irradiation as the conditioning regimen for autologous SCT. Recommendations that SCT is not effective include the following: current purging techniques of bone marrow. Recommendations of equivalence include the following: PBSCT using CD34+ selected or unselected stem cells. No recommendation is made for indications or transplantation techniques that have not been adequately studied, including the following: SCT versus standard chemotherapy as salvage therapy, tandem autologous SCT, autologous or allogeneic SCT as a high-dose sequential regimen, allogeneic BMT versus PBSCT, a preferred allogeneic myeloablative or non-myeloablative conditioning regimen, and maintenance therapy post-autologous SCT with interferon alpha post-SCT. The priority area of needed future research is maintenance therapy posttransplantation with nothing versus interferon alpha versus other agents such as corticosteroids or thalidomide or its derivatives.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/economia , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA