Pitfalls and possibilities of using Root SedLine for continuous assessment of EEG waveform-based metrics in intensive care research.

Objective.The Root SedLine device is used for continuous electroencephalography (cEEG)-based sedation monitoring in intensive care patients. The cEEG traces can be collected for further processing and calculation of relevant metrics not already provided. Depending on the device settings during acquisition, the acquired traces may be distorted by max/min value cropping or high digitization errors. We aimed to systematically assess the impact of these distortions on metrics used for clinical research in the field of neuromonitoring.Approach.A 16 h cEEG acquired using the Root SedLine device at the optimal screen settings was analyzed. Cropping and digitization error effects were simulated by consecutive reduction of the maximum cEEG amplitude by 2µV or by reducing the vertical resolution. Metrics were calculated within ICM+ using minute-by-minute data, including the total power, alpha delta ratio (ADR), and 95% spectral edge frequency. Data were analyzed by creating violin- or box-plots.Main Results.Cropping led to a continuous reduction in total and band power, leading to corresponding changes in variability thereof. The relative power and ADR were less affected. Changes in resolution led to relevant changes. While the total power and power of low frequencies were rather stable, the power of higher frequencies increased with reducing resolution.Significance.Care must be taken when acquiring and analyzing cEEG waveforms from Root SedLine for clinical research. To retrieve good quality metrics, the screen settings must be kept within the central vertical scale, while pre-processing techniques must be applied to exclude unacceptable periods.

Association between EEG metrics and continuous cerebrovascular autoregulation assessment: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: Cerebrovascular autoregulation is defined as the capacity of cerebral blood vessels to maintain stable cerebral blood flow despite changing blood pressure. It is assessed using the pressure reactivity index (the correlation coefficient between mean arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure). The objective of this scoping review is to describe the existing evidence concerning the association of EEG and cerebrovascular autoregulation in order to identify key concepts and detect gaps in the current knowledge. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were searched considering articles between their inception up to September 2023. Inclusion criteria were human (paediatric and adult) and animal studies describing correlations between continuous EEG and cerebrovascular autoregulation assessments. RESULTS: Ten studies describing 481 human subjects (67% adult, 59% critically ill) were identified. Seven studies assessed qualitative (e.g. seizures, epileptiform potentials) and five evaluated quantitative (e.g. bispectral index, alpha-delta ratio) EEG metrics. Cerebrovascular autoregulation was evaluated based on intracranial pressure, transcranial Doppler, or near infrared spectroscopy. Specific combinations of cerebrovascular autoregulation and EEG metrics were evaluated by a maximum of two studies. Seizures, highly malignant patterns or burst suppression, alpha peak frequency, and bispectral index were associated with cerebrovascular autoregulation. The other metrics showed either no or inconsistent associations. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of studies evaluating the link between EEG and cerebrovascular autoregulation. The studies identified included a variety of EEG and cerebrovascular autoregulation acquisition methods, age groups, and diseases allowing for few overarching conclusions. However, the preliminary evidence for the presence of an association between EEG metrics and cerebrovascular autoregulation prompts further in-depth investigations.

Therapy Intensity Level Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury: Clinimetric Assessment on Neuro-Monitored Patients Across 52 European Intensive Care Units.

Intracranial pressure (ICP) data from traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) cannot be interpreted appropriately without accounting for the effect of administered therapy intensity level (TIL) on ICP. A 15-point scale was originally proposed in 1987 to quantify the hourly intensity of ICP-targeted treatment. This scale was subsequently modified-through expert consensus-during the development of TBI Common Data Elements to address statistical limitations and improve usability. The latest 38-point scale (hereafter referred to as TIL) permits integrated scoring for a 24-h period and has a five-category, condensed version (TIL(Basic)) based on qualitative assessment. Here, we perform a total- and component-score analysis of TIL and TIL(Basic) to: 1) validate the scales across the wide variation in contemporary ICP management; 2) compare their performance against that of predecessors; and 3) derive guidelines for proper scale use. From the observational Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study, we extract clinical data from a prospective cohort of ICP-monitored TBI patients (n = 873) from 52 ICUs across 19 countries. We calculate daily TIL and TIL(Basic) scores (TIL24 and TIL(Basic)24, respectively) from each patient's first week of ICU stay. We also calculate summary TIL and TIL(Basic) scores by taking the first-week maximum (TILmax and TIL(Basic)max) and first-week median (TILmedian and TIL(Basic)median) of TIL24 and TIL(Basic)24 scores for each patient. We find that, across all measures of construct and criterion validity, the latest TIL scale performs significantly greater than or similarly to all alternative scales (including TIL(Basic)) and integrates the widest range of modern ICP treatments. TILmedian outperforms both TILmax and summarized ICP values in detecting refractory intracranial hypertension (RICH) during ICU stay. The RICH detection thresholds which maximize the sum of sensitivity and specificity are TILmedian ≥ 7.5 and TILmax ≥ 14. The TIL24 threshold which maximizes the sum of sensitivity and specificity in the detection of surgical ICP control is TIL24 ≥ 9. The median scores of each TIL component therapy over increasing TIL24 reflect a credible staircase approach to treatment intensity escalation, from head positioning to surgical ICP control, as well as considerable variability in the use of cerebrospinal fluid drainage and decompressive craniectomy. Since TIL(Basic)max suffers from a strong statistical ceiling effect and only covers 17% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-18%) of the information in TILmax, TIL(Basic) should not be used instead of TIL for rating maximum treatment intensity. TIL(Basic)24 and TIL(Basic)median can be suitable replacements for TIL24 and TILmedian, respectively (with up to 33% [95% CI: 31-35%] information coverage) when full TIL assessment is infeasible. Accordingly, we derive numerical ranges for categorising TIL24 scores into TIL(Basic)24 scores. In conclusion, our results validate TIL across a spectrum of ICP management and monitoring approaches. TIL is a more sensitive surrogate for pathophysiology than ICP and thus can be considered an intermediate outcome after TBI.

Inducing oscillations in positive end-expiratory pressure improves assessment of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in patients with traumatic brain injury.

The cerebral pressure reactivity index (PRx), through intracranial pressure (ICP) measurements, informs clinicians about the cerebral autoregulation (CA) status in adult-sedated patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Using PRx in clinical practice is currently limited by variability over shorter monitoring periods. We applied an innovative method to reduce the PRx variability by ventilator-induced slow (1/min) positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) oscillations. We hypothesized that, as seen in a previous animal model, the PRx variability would be reduced by inducing slow arterial blood pressure (ABP) and ICP oscillations without other clinically relevant physiological changes. Patients with TBI were ventilated with a static PEEP for 30 min (PRx period) followed by a 30-min period of slow [1/min (0.0167 Hz)] +5 cmH2O PEEP oscillations (induced (iPRx period). Ten patients with TBI were included. No clinical monitoring was discontinued and no additional interventions were required during the iPRx period. The PRx variability [measured as the standard deviation (SD) of PRx] decreased significantly during the iPRx period from 0.25 (0.22-0.30) to 0.14 (0.09-0.17) (P = 0.006). There was a power increase around the induced frequency (1/min) for both ABP and ICP (P = 0.002). In conclusion, 1/min PEEP-induced oscillations reduced the PRx variability in patients with TBI with ICP levels <22 mmHg. No other clinically relevant physiological changes were observed. Reduced PRx variability might improve CA-guided perfusion management by reducing the time to find "optimal" perfusion pressure targets. Larger studies with prolonged periods of PEEP-induced oscillations are required to take it to routine use.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Cerebral autoregulation assessment requires sufficient slow arterial blood pressure (ABP) waves. However, spontaneous ABP waves may be insufficient for reliable cerebral autoregulation estimations. Therefore, we applied a ventilator "sigh-function" to generate positive end-expiratory pressure oscillations that induce slow ABP waves. This method demonstrated a reduced variability of the pressure reactivity index, commonly used as continuous cerebral autoregulation measure in a traumatic brain injury population.

Brain Tissue Oxygen and Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Exploratory Analysis of Insult Burden.

Pressure reactivity index (PRx) and brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2) are associated with outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study explores the relationship between PRx and PbtO2 in adult moderate/severe TBI. Using the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) high resolution intensive care unit (ICU) sub-study cohort, we evaluated those patients with archived high-frequency digital intraparenchymal intracranial pressure (ICP) and PbtO2 monitoring data of, a minimum of 6 h in duration, and the presence of a 6 month Glasgow Outcome Scale -Extended (GOSE) score. Digital physiological signals were processed for ICP, PbtO2, and PRx, with the % time above/below defined thresholds determined. The duration of ICP, PbtO2, and PRx derangements was characterized. Associations with dichotomized 6-month GOSE (alive/dead, and favorable/unfavorable outcome; ≤ 4 = unfavorable), were assessed. A total of 43 patients were included. Severely impaired cerebrovascular reactivity was seen during elevated ICP and low PbtO2 episodes. However, most of the acute ICU physiological derangements were impaired cerebrovascular reactivity, not ICP elevations or low PbtO2 episodes. Low PbtO2 without PRx impairment was rarely seen. % time spent above PRx threshold was associated with mortality at 6 months for thresholds of 0 (area under the curve [AUC] 0.734, p = 0.003), > +0.25 (AUC 0.747, p = 0.002) and > +0.35 (AUC 0.745, p = 0.002). Similar relationships were not seen for % time with ICP >20 mm Hg, and PbtO2 < 20 mm Hg in this cohort. Extreme impairment in cerebrovascular reactivity is seen during concurrent episodes of elevated ICP and low PbtO2. However, the majority of the deranged cerebral physiology seen during the acute ICU phase is impairment in cerebrovascular reactivity, with most impairment occurring in the presence of normal PbtO2 levels. Measures of cerebrovascular reactivity appear to display the most consistent associations with global outcome in TBI, compared with ICP and PbtO2.

Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Individualising therapy is an important challenge for intensive care of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Targeting a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) tailored to optimise cerebrovascular autoregulation has been suggested as an attractive strategy on the basis of a large body of retrospective observational data. The objective of this study is to prospectively assess the feasibility and safety of such a strategy compared with fixed thresholds which is the current standard of care from international consensus guidelines. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: CPPOpt Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness (COGiTATE) is a prospective, multicentre, non-blinded randomised, controlled trial coordinated from Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht (The Netherlands). The other original participating centres are Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge (UK), and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven (Belgium). Adult severe TBI patients requiring intracranial pressure monitoring are randomised within the first 24 hours of admission in neurocritical care unit. For the control arm, the CPP target is the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines target (60-70 mm Hg); for the intervention group an automated CPP target is provided as the CPP at which the patient's cerebrovascular reactivity is best preserved (CPPopt). For a maximum of 5 days, attending clinicians review the CPP target 4-hourly. The main hypothesis of COGiTATE are: (1) in the intervention group the percentage of the monitored time with measured CPP within a range of 5 mm Hg above or below CPPopt will reach 36%; (2) the difference in between groups in daily therapy intensity level score will be lower or equal to 3. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained for each participating centre. The results will be presented at international scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02982122.