Assessment of prognostic value and interreader agreement of ANALI scores in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

PURPOSE: ANALI-scores are two prognostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based scores developed for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Our study aims to assess the interreader agreement between expert radiologists of the two ANALI-scores and of the radiological parameters they utilize, and to test the prognostic performance of the scores in our population. METHOD: Three radiologists evaluated MRIs of 98 PSC-patients from a prospectively collected cohort with median follow-up of 6.7 years. Each parameter of ANALI-scores was assessed, and the scores were calculated. Interreader agreement was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). After consensus reading was reached, the prognostic value of ANALI-scores was assessed with Cox regression, and outcome-free survival rates were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: The ANALI-score without gadolinium had poor to moderate (ICC = 0.56, 95 %CI: 0.42-0.68) and with gadolinium poor (ICC = 0.30, 95 %CI: 0.16-0.44) agreement. Liver deformity (ICC = 0.28, 95 %CI: 0.13-0.44) and parenchymal enhancement heterogeneity (ICC = 0.24, 95 %CI: 0.12-0.38) had poor agreement. Portal hypertension had poor to moderate (ICC = 0.48, 95 %CI: 0.36-0.59) and dilatation of the intrahepatic ducts had moderate (ICC = 0.64, 95 %CI: 0.54-0.73) agreement. Hazard ratios for liver-related death, transplantation or cirrhosis decompensation of the ANALI-scores with and without gadolinium were 3.53 (95 %CI: 1.40-8.93) and 2.25 (95 %CI: 1.56-3.24), respectively. Outcome-free survival was better for patients with low ANALI-scores. CONCLUSIONS: The ANALI-scores show poor to moderate agreement, which challenges their usefulness in clinical practice. They are associated with clinical outcomes, confirming the value of imaging in prognosis of PSC, but need further multicenter evaluation.

Dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for the assessment of total and segmental liver function and volume in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate dynamic hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI (DHCE-MRI) for the assessment of global and segmental liver volume and function in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and to explore the heterogeneous distribution of liver function in this patient group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and 20 healthy volunteers were examined using DHCE-MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA. Segmental and total liver volume were calculated, and functional parameters (hepatic extraction fraction [HEF], input relative blood-flow [irBF], and mean transit time [MTT]) were calculated in each liver voxel using deconvolutional analysis. In each study subject, and incongruence score (IS) was constructed to describe the mismatch between segmental function and volume. Among patients, the liver function parameters were correlated to bile duct obstruction and to established scoring models for liver disease. RESULTS: Liver function was significantly more heterogeneously distributed in the patient group (IS 1.0 versus 0.4). There were significant correlations between biliary obstruction and segmental functional parameters (HEF rho -0.24; irBF rho -0.45), and the Mayo risk score correlated significantly with the total liver extraction capacity of Gd-EOB-DTPA (rho -0.85). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates a new method to quantify total and segmental liver function using DHCE-MRI in patients with PSC.

The international normalized ratio according to Owren in liver disease: interlaboratory assessment and determination of international sensitivity index.

INTRODUCTION: The international normalized ratio (INR) is used to prioritize liver disease patients for transplantation. Previous studies have shown high interlaboratory variability in Quick-based INR determinations in samples of patients with liver disease. We assessed Owren-based INR reagents for analyzing INR in patients with liver disease. Further, we determined the difference between international sensitivity index (ISI) for patients on vitamin K antagonists (ISIVKA) and ISI for patients with liver disease (ISIliver). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with liver disease were included, 10 with INR 1.8-3.6 (group A1) and 10 with INR 1.2-1.5 (group C1). Plasma from these patients was analyzed for Owren-based INR in eight Swedish laboratories using either of following reagents: SPA+, Owrens PT or Nycotest PT. To determine ISI liver, the reference thromboplastin RBT/05 and additional 41 patients with liver disease and 20 normal controls were included. ISIVKA was determined according to the WHO procedure. The difference between the ISIVKA and ISIliver was calculated. RESULTS: The coefficients of variance for the Owren based INR methods were 6.2% in group A1, 3.9 % in group C1 and 5.3% for all patients. The difference between ISIVKA and ISIliver were -0.4%, -0.7% and -0.2% for SPA+, Owrens PT and Nycotest PT respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Interlaboratory variation in INR analyses according to Owren in patients with liver disease is low and the difference between ISIVKA and ISIliver is below 10% with this method. ISIVKA can therefore be used in the INR calibration, for the Owren reagents studied, when analyzing plasma from patients with liver disease.