A Novel Case-Based Learning Activity With a Focus on Food Insecurity.

OBJECTIVE: Food insecurity is a social determinant of health (SDOH) affecting 1 in 10 households per year in the United States and has major impacts on the course of chronic health conditions. It is beneficial to introduce screening and appropriate treatment plans to medical students. This study utilized a novel case-based learning exercise (CBLE) to assess confidence, attitudes and improvements in knowledge on recognizing and addressing food insecurity. METHODS: A CBLE focused on food insecurity was developed to be implemented in a 2-h session as part of the curriculum for all first-year medical students at the Medical University of South Carolina. The CBLE included a case for discussion, followed by an interview with a standardized patient. Students received invitations to complete pre- and post-CBLE assessment surveys. RESULTS: Completion of both pre- and post-surveys was achieved by 29% of students (48 out of 166). Knowledge around the formal definition of "food insecurity," how to recognize food insecurity versus hunger, and how to screen for food insecurity all increased significantly (P < .05). Responses relating to the association between certain chronic diseases and food insecurity did not change pre and post-CBLE. CONCLUSION: This novel CBLE was successfully implemented within a 2-h teaching session and improved knowledge on recognizing food insecurity in practice. However, additional learning exercises are likely needed to improve knowledge of the relationship between food insecurity and chronic disease states. Nonetheless, the CBLE structure provided students with multiple formats of learning and integration of skills, which shows promise and may be applicable to improve knowledge of other SDOHs.

Impact of Community Health Workers on Access to Care for Rural Populations in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Community Health Worker (CHW) interventions have shown potential to reduce inequities for underserved populations. However, there is a lack of support for CHW integration in the delivery of health care. This may be of particular importance in rural areas in the Unites States where access to care remains problematic. This review aims to describe CHW interventions and their outcomes in rural populations in the US. Peer reviewed literature was searched in PubMed and PsycINFO for articles published in English from 2015 to February 2021. Title and abstract screening was performed followed by full text screening. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Downs and Black score. A total of 26 studies met inclusion criteria. The largest proportion were pre-post program evaluation or cohort studies (46.2%). Many described CHW training (69%). Almost a third (30%) indicated the CHW was integrated within the health care team. Interventions aimed to provide health education (46%), links to community resources (27%), or both (27%). Chronic conditions were the concern for most interventions (38.5%) followed by women's health (34.6%). Nearly all studies reported positive improvement in measured outcomes. In addition, studies examining cost reported positive return on investment. This review offers a broad overview of CHW interventions in rural settings in the United States. It provides evidence that CHW can improve access to care in rural settings and may represent a cost-effective investment for the healthcare system.

A Telehealth Initiative to Overcome Health Care Barriers for People Experiencing Homelessness.

People experiencing homelessness (PEH) encounter barriers to health care, increasing their vulnerability to illness, hospitalization, and death. Telehealth can improve access to health care, but its use in PEH has been insufficiently evaluated. Needs assessment surveys completed by clients at an urban drop-in center for PEH (n = 63) showed mental (58.7%) and physical (52.4%) health challenges were common, as was emergency department (ED) use (75.9%, n = 54). Surveys collected after in-person and telehealth clinical visits showed patient satisfaction was >90% for both visit types (n = 125, 44.0% telehealth and 56.0% in person). Without access to telehealth visits, 29.1% of patients would have gone to the ED and 38.2% would not have gotten care. Providers (n = 93, 69.6% telehealth and 30.4% in person) were more likely to agree/strongly agree they made a positive impact on patients' health through telehealth (92.2%) than in person (71.4%) (p = 0.019). Telehealth is a feasible and potentially cost-effective method to increase access to health care and reduce health outcome disparities in PEH.