Nodal Assessment in Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH) is the neoplastic precursor more often associated with endometrial cancer (EC). Nowadays, 25-50% of patients subjected to hysterectomy for preoperative AH are diagnosed with EC at the final pathological analysis. Furthermore, there is no consensus on which preoperative AH patients would benefit from sentinel lymph node mapping. This study aimed to evaluate nodal assessment and preoperative cancer risk factors in preoperative AH patients undergoing nodal surgical staging. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical treatment for AH were retrospectively included in the analysis. Patients were divided into two groups (AH and EC groups) based on the final surgical pathology. The ESGO/ESTRO/ESP risk classification was used for EC cases. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. RESULTS: Of the 207 AH patients treated, 152 cases met the inclusion criteria. Among preoperative AH patients with final EC diagnosis, 39 patients were in the low-risk group (25.7%), 8 in the intermediate-risk group (5.3%), 4 in high-intermediate (2.6%), and 3 patients were allocated in the high-risk group (2.0%). Fifty-four total patients underwent nodal surgical staging. Only one nodal micrometastasis (0.7%) was found at ultrastaging. Multivariate analysis showed abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) (p = 0.01), hypertension (p < 0.01), and endometrial thickness ≥20 mm (p = 0.02) statistically more represented in patients with EC at final surgical analysis. EC risk was 2.9 (95% CI: 1.29-6.48) in AUB, 2.7 (95% CI: 1.06-6.92) in hypertension, and 3.1 (95% CI: 1.19-7.97) in endometrial thickness ≥20 mm cases. LIMITATIONS: The present study has limitations inherent in its retrospective nature. CONCLUSION: The overall risk of nodal metastases in preoperative AH patients was low. Conversely, 9.9% of the preoperative AH patients belonged to the intermediate or high-risk group for EC at the final histological examination. Preoperative cancer risk factors would identify AH patients for whom nodal staging could be suggested.

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for surgical treatment of obese women with endometrial cancer: A cost-benefit comparative analysis.

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the cost of obese patients affected by endometrial cancer undergoing open surgery compared with minimally invasive surgery. In the retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2), the economic expenditure in pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative phases of the selected patients was evaluated. Costs were analyzed for all blood tests, instrumental examinations, consultations, operating materials, drugs, gynecological examinations, hospital stay, intensive care hospitalization and management of operative complications. The average length of stay was longer for patients who underwent laparotomy, with an almost double median hospitalization cost in the open abdominal group compared with the laparoscopic group (€4,805.37 vs. €2,589.25; P<0.0001). Evaluation by another specialist (cardiologist, diabetologist, internist) was necessary in 30.9% of laparotomies vs. 10.4% of laparoscopies (P=0.003). A respiratory support was applied to 38 patients (28.8%), of whom 23 (41.8%) were in the open abdominal arm (P=0.011). Antibiotic and pain-relief therapies resulted in a significantly higher cost for the open abdominal than for the minimally-invasive approach (P=0.027). Considering all the pre-, intra- and post-operative course, the expenses for an obese patient operated by laparoscopy was €4,412.41 vs. €7,323.17 by open surgery, with an average saving of €2,911.03 in favor of minimally-invasive surgery. This study revealed that in obese patients with endometrial cancer, minimally invasive surgery is more advantageous both in terms of costs and post-operative complications. To conclude, laparoscopic surgery in obese patients allows an economic saving of ~60% less than open surgery.

Borderline ovarian tumors and diagnostic dilemma of intraoperative diagnosis: could preoperative He4 assay and ROMA score assessment increase the frozen section accuracy? A multicenter case-control study.

The aim of our study was to assess the value of a preoperative He4-serum-assay and ROMA-score assessment in improving the accuracy of frozen section histology in the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors (BOT). 113 women presenting with a unilateral ovarian mass diagnosed as serous/mucinous BOT at frozen-section-histology (FS) and/or confirmed on final pathology were recruited. Pathologists were informed of the results of preoperative clinical/instrumental assessment of all patients. For Group_A patients, additional information regarding He4, CA125, and ROMA score was available (in Group_B only CA125 was known). The comparison between Group A and Group B in terms of FS accuracy, demonstrated a consensual diagnosis in 62.8% versus 58.6% (P: n.s.), underdiagnosis in 25.6% versus 41.4% (P<0.05), and overdiagnosis in 11.6% versus 0% (P<0.01). Low FS diagnostic accuracy was associated with menopausal status (OR: 2.13), laparoscopic approach (OR: 2.18), mucinous histotype (OR: 2.23), low grading (OR: 1.30), and FIGO stage I (OR: 2.53). Ultrasound detection of papillae (OR: 0.29), septa (OR: 0.39), atypical vascularization (OR: 0.34), serum He4 assay (OR: 0.39), and ROMA score assessment (OR: 0.44) decreased the probability of underdiagnosis. A combined preoperative assessment through serum markers and ultrasonographic features may potentially reduce the risk of underdiagnosis of BOTs on FS while likely increasing the concomitant incidence of false-positive events.

Assessment of tumor size as a useful marker for the surgical staging of endometrial cancer.

Accumulating evidence suggests that the estimation of tumor size may improve endometrial cancer treatment. We conducted an observational study aimed at elucidating the association between tumor size and other universally accepted prognostic factors in order to identify suitable preoperative parameters which can guide surgery in a subgroup of early corpus endometrial cancer. We found that when tumor size increased, both stage and grading were significantly increased. Tumor size was correlated with CA 125 serum values, node metastasis and peritoneal cytology status. Patients who have grade 1 or 2 endometrioid corpus cancer, myometrial invasion < 50% and ≤ 3 cm largest tumor diameter can only be treated with hysterectomy. The tumor largest diameter should be evaluated as a preoperative parameter that indicates patients who do not require lymphadenectomy.