Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Board Fam Pract ; 12(2): 128-32, 1999.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10220235

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 3-year family practice residency curriculum includes longitudinal care of children in the family health center and a 4-month experience dedicated to the care of children. This study was designed to compare the diseases of hospitalized children cared for by family physicians and pediatricians and to examine the use of pediatricians as consultants by family physicians. METHODS: The study included all patients younger than 18 years who were discharged by a family physician or a pediatrician from this semirural hospital during a 3-year period. The primary discharge diagnosis, physician, consultations, and transfer status were recorded. RESULTS: Family physicians cared for 37 percent of the 4169 pediatric patients discharged during the study. Infectious diseases and their complications were the most common conditions for patients who were discharged beyond the newborn period. The 15 most frequent discharge diagnoses were identical for family physicians and pediatricians, accounting for about 86 percent of all discharge diagnoses. Pediatricians, however, cared for 86 percent of the newborns with major complications and were responsible for 80 percent of the infants and children who were transferred. The overall inpatient consultation rate of pediatricians by family physicians was 8 percent, whereas the consultation rate for nonneonatal-related discharges was 20 percent. CONCLUSION: In this semirural environment, family physicians and pediatricians care for a very similar mix of hospitalized pediatric patients. Pediatricians, however, care for a greater proportion of newborns with major complications.


Assuntos
Medicina de Família e Comunidade/educação , Internato e Residência , Pediatria/educação , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pennsylvania
2.
Am Fam Physician ; 50(8): 1763-8, 1994 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7977005

RESUMO

Enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weigth heparin, has recently been approved for use in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis following elective hip replacement surgery. Clinical trials have demonstrated enoxaparin to be superior to placebo, dextran and unfractionated heparin in deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. However, no published studies have compared the efficacy of enoxaparin with that of warfarin in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis. Advantages of enoxaparin include less frequent dosing, reduced need for laboratory monitoring and a lower incidence of adverse effects, including hemorrhage. Although enoxaparin is more expensive than unfractionated heparin, its potential benefits may offset its higher cost.


Assuntos
Enoxaparina/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Custos de Medicamentos , Enoxaparina/economia , Enoxaparina/farmacologia , Prótese de Quadril , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA