RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The Community Ageing Research 75+ (CARE75+) study is a longitudinal cohort study collecting extensive health and social data, with a focus on frailty, independence and quality of life in older age. CARE75+ was the first international experimental frailty research cohort designed using trial within cohorts (TwiCs) methodology, aligning epidemiological research with clinical trial evaluation of interventions to improve the health and well-being of older people. CARE75+ REMOTE is an extension of CARE75+ using a remote model that does not require face-to-face interactions for data collection in the current circumstances of a global pandemic and will provide an efficient, sustainable data collection model. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Prospective cohort study using TwiCs. One thousand community-dwelling older people (≥75 years) will be recruited from UK general practices by telephone. Exclusions include: nursing home/care home residents; those with an estimated life expectancy of 3 months or less; and people receiving palliative care. DATA COLLECTION: Assessments will be conducted by telephone, web-submission or postal questionnaire: baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months and 36 months. Measures include activities of daily living, mood, health-related quality of life, comorbidities, medications, frailty, informal care, healthcare and social care service use. Consent will be sought for data linkage and invitations to additional studies (sub-studies). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: CARE75+ was approved by the National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee Yorkshire and the Humber-Bradford Leeds 10 October 2014 (14/YH/1120). CARE75+ REMOTE (amendment 13) was approved on the 18th November 2020. Consent is sought if an individual is willing to participate and has capacity to provide informed consent. Consultee assent is sought if an individual lacks capacity. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals and conferences. Results will be summarised and disseminated to study participants via newsletters, local engagement events and on a bespoke website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16588124.
Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Envelhecimento , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The impact of socio-economic status (SES) on congenital heart disease (CHD)-related mortality in children is not well established. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to systematically review and appraise the existing evidence on the association between SES (including poverty, parental education, health insurance, and income) and mortality among children with CHD. DATA SOURCES: Seven electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Natural, and Biological Science Collections), reference lists, citations, and key journals were searched. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We included articles reporting original research on the association between SES and mortality in children with CHD if they were full papers published in the English language and regardless of (a) timing of mortality; (b) individual or area-based measures of SES; (c) CHD subtype; (d) age at ascertainment; (e) study period examined. Screening for eligibility, data extraction, and quality appraisal were performed in duplicate. SYNTHESIS: Meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled ORs for in-hospital mortality according to health insurance status. RESULTS: Of 1388 identified articles, 28 met the inclusion criteria. Increased area-based poverty was associated with increased odds/risk of postoperative (n = 1), neonatal (n = 1), post-discharge (n = 1), infant (n = 1), and long-term mortality (n = 2). Higher parental education was associated with decreased odds/risk of neonatal (n = 1) and infant mortality (n = 5), but not with long-term mortality (n = 1). A meta-analysis of four US articles showed increased unadjusted odds of in-hospital mortality in those with government/public versus private health insurance (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.24, 1.56). The association between area-based income and CHD-related mortality was conflicting, with three of eight articles reporting significant associations. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides evidence that children of lower SES are at increased risk of CHD-related mortality. As these children are over-represented in the CHD population, interventions targeting socio-economic inequalities could have a large impact on improving CHD survival.
Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Cardiopatias Congênitas/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Cardiopatias Congênitas/economia , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Áreas de Pobreza , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in cause-specific stillbirth and neonatal mortality to identify key areas of focus for future intervention strategies to achieve government ambitions to reduce mortality rates. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: England, Wales, Scotland and the UK Crown Dependencies. PARTICIPANTS: All singleton births between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2015 at ≥24 weeks' gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cause-specific stillbirth or neonatal death (0-27 days after birth) per 10 000 births by deprivation quintile. RESULTS: Data on 5694 stillbirths (38.1 per 10 000 total births) and 2368 neonatal deaths (15.9 per 10 000 live births) were obtained from Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK (MBRRACE-UK). Women from the most deprived areas were 1.68 (95% CI 1.56 to 1.81) times more likely to experience a stillbirth and 1.67 (95% CI 1.48 to 1.87) times more likely to experience a neonatal death than those from the least deprived areas, equating to an excess of 690 stillbirths and 231 neonatal deaths per year associated with deprivation. Small for gestational age (SGA) unexplained antepartum stillbirth was the greatest contributor to excess stillbirths accounting for 33% of the deprivation gap in stillbirths. Congenital anomalies accounted for the majority (59%) of the deprivation gap in neonatal deaths, followed by preterm birth not SGA (24-27 weeks, 27%). CONCLUSIONS: Cause-specific mortality rates at a national level allow identification of key areas of focus for future intervention strategies to reduce mortality. Despite a reduction in the deprivation gap for stillbirths and neonatal deaths, public health interventions should primarily focus on socioeconomic determinants of SGA stillbirth and congenital anomalies.
Assuntos
Causas de Morte/tendências , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Mortalidade Infantil/tendências , Natimorto/epidemiologia , Anormalidades Congênitas/mortalidade , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Lactente , Lactente Extremamente Prematuro , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Pequeno para a Idade Gestacional , Mortalidade Perinatal/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the risk of developing cancer in relation to the typical radiation doses received from a range of X-ray guided cardiac catheterisations in children, taking variable survival into account. METHODS: Radiation doses were estimated for 2749 procedures undertaken at five UK hospitals using Monte Carlo simulations. The lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence was estimated using models developed by the Biological Effects of Ionising Radiation committee, based on both normal life expectancy, and as a function of attained age, from 20 to 80â years, to take reduced life expectancy into account. RESULTS: The radiation-related risks from these procedures are dominated by lung and breast cancer (for females). Assuming normal life expectancy, central LAR estimates for cancer incidence, based on median doses, ranged from <1 in 2000 for atrial septal defect occlusions to as high as 1 in 150 for valve replacements. For a reduced life expectancy of 50â years, estimated risks are lower by a factor of around 7. For conditions with especially poor survival (age 20â years), such as hypoplastic left heart syndrome, estimated cancer risks attributable to radiation were <1 in 20â 000. CONCLUSIONS: Based on recent UK radiation dose levels, the risk of cancer following cardiac catheterisations is relatively low and strongly modified by survival and the type of procedure. The risk of breast cancer, especially following pulmonary artery angioplasty and valve replacements, is the greatest concern.