Consensus document on chronic coronary syndrome assessment and risk stratification in Portugal: A position paper statement from the [Portuguese Society of Cardiology's] Working Groups on Nuclear Cardiology, Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac Computed Tomography, Echocardiography, and Exercise Physiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation. / Documento de Consenso sobre Estratificação de Risco Cardiovascular e estudo da doença coronária em Portugal: a posição dos Grupos de Estudo de Cardiologia Nuclear, Ressonância Magnética e Tomografia Computorizada Cardíaca, de Ecocardiografia e de Fisiopatologia do Esforço e Reabilitação Cardíaca.

Despite constant medical evolution, the reimbursement policy of Portuguese National Health Service (NHS) for the study and risk stratification of coronary heart disease has remained unchanged for several decades. Lack of adjustment to contemporary clinical practice has long been evident. However, the recent publication of the European Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic coronary syndromes further highlighted this gap and the urgent need for a change. Prompted by these Guidelines, the Working Group on Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac CT, the Working Group on Echocardiography and the Working Group on Stress Pathophysiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, began a process of joint reflection on the current limitations and how these recommendations could be applied in Portugal. To this end, the authors suggest that the new imaging methods (stress echocardiogram, cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance), should be added to exercise treadmill stress test and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the available exam portfolio within the Portuguese NHS. This change would allow full adoption of European guidelines and a better use of tests, according to clinical context, availability and local specificities. The adoption of clinical guidance standards, based on these assumptions, would translate into a qualitative improvement in the management of these patients and would promote an effective use of the available resources, with potential health and financial gains.

Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial.

OBJECTIVES: More than 3.5 million invasive coronary angiographies (ICA) are performed in Europe annually. Approximately 2 million of these invasive procedures might be reduced by noninvasive tests because no coronary intervention is performed. Computed tomography (CT) is the most accurate noninvasive test for detection and exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD). To investigate the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA, we designed the European pragmatic multicentre DISCHARGE trial funded by the 7th Framework Programme of the European Union (EC-GA 603266). METHODS: In this trial, patients with a low-to-intermediate pretest probability (10-60 %) of suspected CAD and a clinical indication for ICA because of stable chest pain will be randomised in a 1-to-1 ratio to CT or ICA. CT and ICA findings guide subsequent management decisions by the local heart teams according to current evidence and European guidelines. RESULTS: Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke as a composite endpoint will be the primary outcome measure. Secondary and other outcomes include cost-effectiveness, radiation exposure, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), socioeconomic status, lifestyle, adverse events related to CT/ICA, and gender differences. CONCLUSIONS: The DISCHARGE trial will assess the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA. KEY POINTS: • Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. • Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the reference standard for detection of CAD. • Noninvasive computed tomography angiography excludes CAD with high sensitivity. • CT may effectively reduce the approximately 2 million negative ICAs in Europe. • DISCHARGE addresses this hypothesis in patients with low-to-intermediate pretest probability for CAD.

Assessment of cardiovascular physiology using dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals impaired contractile reserve in patients with cirrhotic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Liver cirrhosis has been shown to affect cardiac performance. However cardiac dysfunction may only be revealed under stress conditions. The value of non-invasive stress tests in diagnosing cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is unclear. We sought to investigate the response to pharmacological stimulation with dobutamine in patients with cirrhosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. METHODS: Thirty-six patients and eight controls were scanned using a 1.5 T scanner (Siemens Symphony TIM; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Conventional volumetric and feature tracking analysis using dedicated software (CMR42; Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc, Calgary, Canada and Diogenes MRI; Tomtec; Germany, respectively) were performed at rest and during low to intermediate dose dobutamine stress. RESULTS: Whilst volumetry based parameters were similar between patients and controls at rest, patients had a smaller increase in cardiac output during stress (p = 0.015). Ejection fraction increase was impaired in patients during 10 µg/kg/min dobutamine as compared to controls (6.9 % vs. 16.5 %, p = 0.007), but not with 20 µg/kg/min (12.1 % vs. 17.6 %, p = 0.12). This was paralleled by an impaired improvement in circumferential strain with low dose (median increase of 14.4 % vs. 30.9 %, p = 0.03), but not with intermediate dose dobutamine (median increase of 29.4 % vs. 33.9 %, p = 0.54). There was an impaired longitudinal strain increase in patients as compared to controls during low (median increase of 6.6 % vs 28.6 %, p < 0.001) and intermediate dose dobutamine (median increase of 2.6%vs, 12.6 % p = 0.016). Radial strain response to dobutamine was similar in patients and controls (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is characterized by an impaired cardiac pharmacological response that can be detected with magnetic resonance myocardial stress testing. Deformation analysis parameters may be more sensitive in identifying abnormalities in inotropic response to stress than conventional methods.

Noninvasive anatomical and functional assessment of coronary artery disease.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is traditionally the diagnostic tool of choice. However, patients often have no significant disease. Moreover, assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been shown to have prognostic implications. Recently, coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-Perf) have gained increasing attention through their accurate anatomical and functional assessment, respectively. We studied the added value of integrating these tests (CT+CMRint) in the diagnosis of CAD, with FFR as the reference standard. METHODS: We included 101 patients consecutively referred for outpatient assessment of CAD who underwent CTA and CMR-Perf prior to ICA with FFR assessment. Lesions were considered positive by CT+CMRint only if positive in the two tests alone. The mean follow-up was 2.9±0.6 years. RESULTS: All patients completed the study protocol without adverse effects. Forty-four patients had CAD by FFR. CTA had excellent sensitivity and negative predictive value (100%) but, as expected, its specificity and positive predictive value were lower (61% and 67%, respectively). Diagnostic accuracy by FFR was 78% for CTA, 88% for CMR-Perf and 92% for CT+CMRint. Regarding diagnostic accuracy, CT+CMRint showed statistically significant superiority (AUC=0.917, 95% CI 0.845-0.963) compared with CTA (AUC=0.807, 95% CI 0.716-0.879, p=0.0057) or CMR-Perf (AUC=0.882, 95% CI 0.802-0.938, p=0.0398) alone. Regarding prediction of revascularization, the integrated protocol maintained its superior performance. CONCLUSIONS: CT+CMRint showed superior diagnostic accuracy and could thus lead to a considerable reduction in invasive procedures for CAD diagnosis, with less risk and greater patient comfort.

Anatomical versus functional assessment of coronary artery disease: direct comparison of computed tomography coronary angiography and magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with intermediate pre-test probability.

Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI) are state-of-the-art tools for noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CTA and CMR-MPI for the detection of functionally relevant CAD, using invasive coronary angiography (XA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a reference standard, and to evaluate the best protocol integrating these techniques for assessment of patients with suspected CAD. 95 patients (68 % men; 62 ± 8.1 years) with intermediate pre-test probability (PTP) of CAD underwent a sequential protocol of CTA, CMR-MPI and XA. Significant CAD was defined as >90 % coronary stenosis, 40-90 % stenosis with FFR ≤ 0.80 or left main stenosis ≥50 %. Prevalence of significant CAD was 43 %. CTA was more sensitive (100 %) but less specific (59 %) than CMR-MPI (88 and 89 %, respectively) for detection of significant CAD, with a strong trend for higher global diagnostic accuracy of CMR-MPI (88 vs. 77 %, p = 0.05). An integrated approach based on an initial CTA and subsequent referral to CMR-MPI of positive/inconclusive results had the best diagnostic performance (AUC 0.91). The direct referral to XA of patients with positive/inconclusive CTA performed worse than a selective approach based on CMR-MPI results (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.91, p = 0.005). In this intermediate PTP population, CMR-MPI showed a strong trend toward better performance compared to CTA for the assessment of functionally significant CAD. A combined protocol integrating coronary anatomy and function seems to be a very effective approach in the accurate diagnosis of CAD.

Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT).

BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography has become the foremost noninvasive imaging modality of the coronary arteries and is used as an alternative to the reference standard, conventional coronary angiography, for direct visualization and detection of coronary artery stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, there is considerable debate regarding the optimal target population to maximize clinical performance and patient benefit. The most obvious indication for noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease would be to reliably exclude significant stenosis and, thus, avoid unnecessary invasive conventional coronary angiography. To do this, a test should have, at clinically appropriate pretest likelihoods, minimal false-negative outcomes resulting in a high negative predictive value. However, little is known about the influence of patient characteristics on the clinical predictive values of coronary computed tomography angiography. Previous regular systematic reviews and meta-analyses had to rely on limited summary patient cohort data offered by primary studies. Performing an individual patient data meta-analysis will enable a much more detailed and powerful analysis and thus increase representativeness and generalizability of the results. The individual patient data meta-analysis is registered with the PROSPERO database (CoMe-CCT, CRD42012002780). METHODS/DESIGN: The analysis will include individual patient data from published and unpublished prospective diagnostic accuracy studies comparing coronary computed tomography angiography with conventional coronary angiography. These studies will be identified performing a systematic search in several electronic databases. Corresponding authors will be contacted and asked to provide obligatory and additional data. Risk factors, previous test results and symptoms of individual patients will be used to estimate the pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease. A bivariate random-effects model will be used to calculate pooled mean negative and positive predictive values as well as sensitivity and specificity. The primary outcome of interest will be positive and negative predictive values of coronary computed tomography angiography for the presence of coronary artery disease as a function of pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease, analyzed by meta-regression. As a secondary endpoint, factors that may influence the diagnostic performance and clinical value of computed tomography, such as heart rate and body mass index of patients, number of detector rows, and administration of beta blockade and nitroglycerin, will be investigated by integrating them as further covariates into the bivariate random-effects model. DISCUSSION: This collaborative individual patient data meta-analysis should provide answers to the pivotal question of which patients benefit most from noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography and thus help to adequately select the right patients for this test.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking for quantitative viability assessment in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Low dose dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging is valuable to assess viability in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Analysis is usually qualitative with considerable operator dependency. The aim of the current study was to investigate the feasibility of cine images derived quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial feature tracking (FT) strain parameters to assess viability in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: 15 consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy referred for viability assessment were studied at 3T at rest and during low dose dobutamine stress (5 and 10µg/kg/min of dobutamine). Subendocardial and subepicardial circumferential (Eccendo and Eccepi) and radial (Err) strains were assessed using steady state free precession (SSFP) cine images orientated in 3 short axis slices covering 16 myocardial segments. RESULTS: Dysfunctional segments without scar (n=75) improved in all three strain parameters: Eccendo (Rest: -10.5±6.9; 5µg: -12.1±6.9; 10µg: -14.1±9.2; p<0.05), Eccepi (Rest: -7±4.8; 5µg: -8.2±5.5; 10µg: -9.1±5.9; p<0.05) and Err (Rest: 11.7±8.3; 5µg: 16±10.9; 10µg: 16.5±12.8; p<0.05). There was no response to dobutamine in dysfunctional segments with scar transmurality above 75% (n=6): Eccendo (Rest: -4.7±3.0; 5µg: -2.9±2.5; 10µg: -6.6±3.3; p=ns), Eccepi (Rest: -2.9±2.9; 5µg: -5.4±3.9; 10µg: -4.5±4.2; p=ns) and Err (Rest:9.5±5; 5µg:5.4±6.2; 10µg:4.9±3.3; p=ns). Circumferential strain (Eccendo, Eccepi) improved in all segments up to a transmurality of 75% (n=60; p<0.05). Err improved in segments <50% transmurality (n=45; p<0.05) and remained unchanged above 50% transmurality (n=21; p=ns). CONCLUSIONS: CMR-FT is a novel technique, which detects quantitative wall motion derived from SSFP cine imaging at rest and with low dose dobutamine stress. CMR-FT holds promise of quantitative assessment of viability in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with cardiovascular MRI: what radiologists should know.

Diastolic dysfunction is a common entity and the predominant cause of heart failure in 40%-50% of patients. Diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction is clinically relevant and associated with a poor prognosis. The aim of this essay was to review the pathophysiology and different grades of diastolic dysfunction and to provide an overview on the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of diastolic function.

Assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability using cardiac magnetic resonance.

In the past decade, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has evolved dramatically. Its clinical applications are now a major tool in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of patients with ischemic heart disease. CMR can be used for detection and quantification of ischemia and for viability assessment using different techniques that are now well validated. Scar can be easily detected using contrast enhancement (late gadolinium enhancement). Ischemia detection is usually achieved with stress CMR techniques, whereas prediction for the recovery of function (detection of dysfunctional but viable myocardial segments) can be deduced from scar and stress imaging. Although determination of which approach is better may depend on the population group, the major advantage of CMR is the ability to integrate different information about anatomy, wall motion, myocardial perfusion, and tissue characterization in a single comprehensive examination.

[Myocardial revascularization surgery, depressive symptoms and labeling effect]. / Cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica, sintomas depressivos e efeito rotulação.

INTRODUCTION: The individual awareness of one's own disease, the so called labeling effect, may result in a reduction of one's sense of perceived health. In patients submitted to coronary artery bypass surgery it has been reported that the diagnosis of depression is associated with a higher rate of hospitalization and it's an independent risk factor for cardiac events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the modification of depressive symptoms induced by the information of medical indication for myocardial revascularization surgery. METHODS: We studied the presence of depressive symptoms, socio-demographic variables, cardiovascular status and therapeutic procedures in two groups of consecutive patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome. In the labeled group the BDI-1 was performed after clinical stabilization and the BDI-2 after the information of myocardial revascularization surgery need. In the control group the BDI-1 was answered after clinical stabilization and the BDI-2 48-72 hours later. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the difference of depressive symptoms between the groups. RESULTS: Distribution by age, marital status and education level was similar between the two groups. The cardiovascular risk profile was alike. The difference between BDI-1 and BDI-2 was significantly higher in the labeled group (4.6-/+4.2 vs 0.8-/+3.2; p=0.005). There were no significant differences between the final diagnosis (unstable angina in the labeled group 50% vs control group 45.5%; AMI without Q wave 30% vs 27.3%; AMI with Q wave 20% vs 27.3%) and in hospital clinical evolution. CONCLUSION: The individual awareness of the need to coronary bypass surgery was associated with a clinical and statistical significant increase of depressive symptoms. Hence, routine evaluation of depressive symptoms as a part of a preoperative protocol, may allow identification of the patients, who may benefit from therapeutic intervention.