The impact of free medical supplies and regular telephonic contact on glycemic control in Indian children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The effect of economic assistance to underprivileged families with type 1 diabetes has never been described. Such a study is relevant as logistic and cultural factors may preclude an anticipated good outcome. The objective of the study is to determine the impact of economic and educational intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and diabetes knowledge. METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive participants were prospectively provided insulin and glucose strips for 1 year. From the 6th to 12th month, patients were randomized such that half of them (telephone group) received proactive telephonic advice by a diabetes educator, while the non-telephone group received usual care. HbA1c and diabetes knowledge were measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Significant improvement was seen in HbA1c with provision of free diabetes supplies, when patients were compared with their own HbA1c values during the prior 36 months (baseline [8.38 ± 2.0%], at 3 months [8.0 ± 1.6%] and at 6 months [8.1 ± 1.5%, P = 0.0106]). Knowledge score increased from baseline (48 ± 15) to 6 months (58 ± 13, P < 0.001). No difference was seen between the telephone and non-telephone groups in HbA1c from the 6th to 9th and 12th month. The knowledge score showed significant improvement in the telephone group during the proactive telephonic advice study compared with the non-telephone group (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The provision of free medical supplies improved HbA1c and diabetes knowledge. Intensive telephone contact improved knowledge, not HbA1c. These results provide important background for policy makers and diabetes management teams.

High direct costs of medical care in patients with Type 1 diabetes attending a referral clinic in a government-funded hospital in Northern India.

BACKGROUND: There is little information regarding costs of managing type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) from low- and middle-income countries. We estimated direct costs of T1DM in patients attending a referral diabetes clinic in a governmentfunded hospital in northern India. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 88 consecutive T1DM patients (mean [SD] age 15.3 [8] years) with age at onset <18 years presenting to the endocrine clinic of our institution. Data on direct costs were collected for a 12 months-6 months retrospectively followed by 6 months prospectively. RESULTS: Patients belonged predominantly (77%) to the middle socioeconomic strata (SES); 81% had no access to government subsidy or health insurance. The mean direct cost per patient-year of T1DM was `27 915 (inter-quartile range [IQR] `19 852-32 856), which was 18.6% (7.1%-30.1%) of the total family income. A greater proportion of income was spent by families of lower compared to middle SES (32.6% v. 6.6%, p<0.001). The mean out-of-pocket payment for diabetes care ranged from 2% to 100% (mean 87%) of the total costs. The largest expenditure was on home blood glucose monitoring (40%) and insulin (39.5%). On multivariate analysis, total direct cost was associated with annual family income (ß=0.223, p=0.033), frequency of home blood glucose monitoring (ß=0.249, p=0.016) and use of analogue insulin (ß=0.225, p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Direct costs of T1DM were high; in proportion to their income the costs were greater in the lower SES. The largest expenditure was on home blood glucose monitoring and insulin. Support for insulin and glucose testing strips for T1DM care is urgently required.

Intensive glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus: does it improve cardiovascular outcomes?

With growing urbanization and economic development, there is a rapid increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in India. T2DM is associated with 2-4 times higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary artery disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disease. Several studies have shown the benefit of intensive glycaemic control in reducing the frequency of diabetic microvascular complications such as retinopathy and nephropathy. Results of long term follow up of patients with diabetes, who were enrolled in earlier trials, have shown that initial intensive glycaemic control led to a reduction in CVD outcomes when compared with standard therapy. However, it is unclear if intensive glycaemic control, aiming to reduce haemoglobin A1c to levels even lower than the current goal of <7%, will similarly lead to reduction in the rates of CVD. Recently, the results of 3 large, randomized controlled trials have been published, which suggest that in established T2DM with previous CVD or high risk of CVD, the benefits of intensive glycaemic control when compared with conventional good control, are minimal with regards to reduction of cardiovascular outcomes. Intensive therapy increases the risk of side-effects such as severe hypoglycaemia and weight gain. The implementation of such a therapy, with rigorous attention to frequent monitoring of blood glucose and visits to the physician, is not likely to be possible on a large scale, especially in a developing country such as India. The aim of management of patients with established T2DM should be to achieve the goal of good glycaemic control (haemoglobin A1c<7%), with avoidance of hypoglycaemia. It is equally, if not more important, to control other risk factors of CVD by paying greater attention to lifestyle measures (weight loss if overweight or obese, regular exercise, cessation of smoking), rigorous control of blood pressure (<130/80 mmHg) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (<100 mg/dl or <70 mg/dl if already diagnosed with CVD) and the prophylactic use of low dose aspirin as per current recommendations. A multifactorial approach targeting multiple cardiovascular risk factors is likely to be most effective in reducing CVD outcomes in T2DM.