Prevalence and epidemiological profile of celiac disease in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Experience from a tertiary care center of India.

BACKGROUND: The HLA associations of celiac disease (CD) in north Indians differ from that in Europeans. Our dietary gluten is among the highest in the world. Data on CD in people with diabetes (PWD) in north India is scant. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and clinical profile of CD in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective review of case records of PWD with onset ≤18 years of age, registered between 2009 and 2020, having at least one anti tissue-transglutaminase (anti-tTG) serology report. RESULTS: Of 583 registered PWD, 398 (68.2%) had celiac serology screening. A positive report was obtained in 66 (16.6%). Of 51 biopsied people, 22 (5.5%) were diagnosed to have CD, 12 in the first 2 years of diabetes onset. Symptomatic CD at diagnosis was seen in 63% (14/22). Age at diabetes onset (median [IQR] age 5.5 years, [2-12]) was lower in PWD and CD compared to PWD alone (10 years, [7-14], p < 0.016). Of 36 biopsied children with anti-tTG >100 au/ml, 20 (55.5%) had CD, while 2 out of 15 (13.3%) of those with lower anti-tTG titer had histopathology suggestive of CD. Of 23 seropositive children not diagnosed with CD, 5 of 8 with anti tTG >100 au/ml, and all 15 with lower anti-tTG, had normalization of titers over the 24 (10-41) months. CONCLUSIONS: Our prevalence of CD is comparable to international data. Celiac disease was common with younger age at onset of T1D and higher titer of celiac serology. A high proportion was symptomatic of CD at diagnosis.

Influence of Socio-Economic and Cultural Factors on Type 1 Diabetes Management: Report from a Tertiary Care Multidisciplinary Diabetes Management Center in India.

OBJECTIVE: To study the association of socio-economic (SE) and cultural factors with HbA1c and diabetes knowledge of children, adolescents and young adults with T1DM managed in the authors' centre, as these may be unique to a country or a region. METHODS: Demographic details, SE scoring, body mass index and mean of the last two HbA1c values were recorded, in 173 eligible patients. A diabetes knowledge test (DKT) was administered. RESULTS: Median (range) age was 14.0 (3.25-25.5) y and HbA1c 8.2 ± 1.3%. The patients travelled a median of 124 (range 0.5-850) km and 2.3 (range 0.1-18.3) h each way, to reach the clinic. Only 2 children took insulin at school / college. Insulin adjustment for pre-meal blood glucose was practiced by 88%, but adjustment for meal intake by only 17% patients. Median HbA1c was lower in the participants with age > 18 y [7.7 (5.6-11.0) %] vs. < 10 y [8.3 (6.3-10.6) %, p < 0.02] or 10-18 y [(8.3 (5.9-12.6) %, p < 0.02)]. Overweight /obesity were seen in 35%. On multivariate regression, HbA1c was associated negatively with DKT score (DKTS) and age group, and DKTS was associated positively with urban residence and maternal education > class 12th. HbA1c and DKTS were not associated with income. CONCLUSIONS: Low income may be successfully compensated by other factors to obtain good glycemic control. HbA1c did not deteriorate in adolescence in contrast to world experience. Overweight is a worrisome problem. Improved societal awareness about childhood diabetes is crucial.

The impact of free medical supplies and regular telephonic contact on glycemic control in Indian children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The effect of economic assistance to underprivileged families with type 1 diabetes has never been described. Such a study is relevant as logistic and cultural factors may preclude an anticipated good outcome. The objective of the study is to determine the impact of economic and educational intervention on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and diabetes knowledge. METHODS: Eighty-five consecutive participants were prospectively provided insulin and glucose strips for 1 year. From the 6th to 12th month, patients were randomized such that half of them (telephone group) received proactive telephonic advice by a diabetes educator, while the non-telephone group received usual care. HbA1c and diabetes knowledge were measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Significant improvement was seen in HbA1c with provision of free diabetes supplies, when patients were compared with their own HbA1c values during the prior 36 months (baseline [8.38 ± 2.0%], at 3 months [8.0 ± 1.6%] and at 6 months [8.1 ± 1.5%, P = 0.0106]). Knowledge score increased from baseline (48 ± 15) to 6 months (58 ± 13, P < 0.001). No difference was seen between the telephone and non-telephone groups in HbA1c from the 6th to 9th and 12th month. The knowledge score showed significant improvement in the telephone group during the proactive telephonic advice study compared with the non-telephone group (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The provision of free medical supplies improved HbA1c and diabetes knowledge. Intensive telephone contact improved knowledge, not HbA1c. These results provide important background for policy makers and diabetes management teams.

Pediatric Endocrinology in India: Development, Progress, Problems and Challenges.

The exponential growth of biological sciences and biotechnology has promoted the development of subspecialties / super specialties in medicine. In developing countries, socioeconomic factors influence and determine competing health priorities, often delaying the development of subspecialties in medicine. Tracing the history of development and progress of Endocrinology in general and Pediatric Endocrinology in particular, provides an overall perspective of the problems and challenges which lie ahead.

High direct costs of medical care in patients with Type 1 diabetes attending a referral clinic in a government-funded hospital in Northern India.

BACKGROUND: There is little information regarding costs of managing type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) from low- and middle-income countries. We estimated direct costs of T1DM in patients attending a referral diabetes clinic in a governmentfunded hospital in northern India. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 88 consecutive T1DM patients (mean [SD] age 15.3 [8] years) with age at onset <18 years presenting to the endocrine clinic of our institution. Data on direct costs were collected for a 12 months-6 months retrospectively followed by 6 months prospectively. RESULTS: Patients belonged predominantly (77%) to the middle socioeconomic strata (SES); 81% had no access to government subsidy or health insurance. The mean direct cost per patient-year of T1DM was `27 915 (inter-quartile range [IQR] `19 852-32 856), which was 18.6% (7.1%-30.1%) of the total family income. A greater proportion of income was spent by families of lower compared to middle SES (32.6% v. 6.6%, p<0.001). The mean out-of-pocket payment for diabetes care ranged from 2% to 100% (mean 87%) of the total costs. The largest expenditure was on home blood glucose monitoring (40%) and insulin (39.5%). On multivariate analysis, total direct cost was associated with annual family income (ß=0.223, p=0.033), frequency of home blood glucose monitoring (ß=0.249, p=0.016) and use of analogue insulin (ß=0.225, p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Direct costs of T1DM were high; in proportion to their income the costs were greater in the lower SES. The largest expenditure was on home blood glucose monitoring and insulin. Support for insulin and glucose testing strips for T1DM care is urgently required.