Lifestyle information and commercial weight management groups to support maternal postnatal weight management and positive lifestyle behaviour: the SWAN feasibility randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial (RCT) of clinical and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle information and commercial weight management groups to support postnatal weight management to 12 months post-birth. DESIGN: Two-arm feasibility trial, with nested mixed-methods process evaluation. SETTING: Inner-city unit, south England. POPULATION: Women with body mass indices (BMIs) ≥25 kg/m2 at pregnancy booking or normal BMIs (18.5-24.9 kg/m2 ) identified with excessive gestational weight gain at 36 weeks of gestation. METHODS: Randomised to standard care plus commercial weight management sessions commencing 8-16 weeks postnatally or standard care only. MAIN OUTCOMES: Feasibility outcomes included assessment of recruitment, retention, acceptability and economic data collation. Primary and secondary end points included difference between groups in weight 12 months postnatally compared with booking (proposed primary outcome for a future trial), diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol, mental health, infant feeding, NHS resource use. RESULTS: In all, 193 women were randomised: 98 intervention and 95 control; only four women had excessive gestational weight gain. A slightly greater weight change was found among intervention women at 12 months, with greatest benefit. Among women attending ten or more weight management sessions. There was >80% follow up to 12 months, low risk of contamination and no group differences in trial completion. CONCLUSION: It was feasible to recruit and retain women with BMIs ≥25 kg/m2 to an intervention to support postnatal weight management; identification of excessive gestational weight gain requires consideration. Economic modelling could inform out-of-trial costs and benefits in a future trial. A definitive trial is an important next step. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: A feasibility RCT of postnatal weight support showed women with BMIs ≥25 kg/m2 can be recruited and followed to 12 months postnatally.

Bilingual young people's experiences of interpreting in primary care: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Young people are often used as interpreters for family members in the primary healthcare setting. AIM: To explore bilingual young people's accounts of interpreting for family or friends in primary care settings. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews. SETTING: Community and youth groups in London. METHODS: Young people aged nine to 18 years old (n = 77) were purposively sampled to include those from established and recently arrived groups and were from Vietnamese, Kurdish, Bangladeshi or Eastern European backgrounds. Participants were interviewed one-to-one or with a friend, and interview transcripts were analysed to identify key themes. RESULTS: Young people were used for interpreting because of deficiencies in services, and also by choice. They identified advantages and disadvantages in their experiences. The majority of healthcare encounters were regarded as unproblematic. Three factors contributed to less successful encounters: healthcare professionals' or patients' communication skills; young people's own language skills, and the nature of the healthcare problem. CONCLUSION: This study identifies ways in which primary care professionals could facilitate better communication in encounters where young people are used as interpreters.

Development and preliminary evaluation of a clinical guidance programme for the decision about prophylactic oophorectomy in women undergoing a hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a decision analysis based and computerised clinical guidance programme (CGP) that provides patient specific guidance on the decision whether or not to undergo a prophylactic oophorectomy to reduce the risk of subsequent ovarian cancer and to undertake a preliminary pilot and evaluation. SUBJECTS: Women who had already agreed to have a hysterectomy who otherwise had no ovarian pathology. SETTING: Oophorectomy decision consultation at the outpatient or pre-admission clinic. METHODS: A CGP was developed with advice from gynaecologists and patient groups, incorporating a set of Markov models within a decision analytical framework to evaluate the benefits of undergoing a prophylactic oophorectomy or not on the basis of quality adjusted life expectancy, life expectancy, and for varying durations of hormone replacement therapy. Sensitivity analysis and preliminary testing of the CGP were undertaken to compare its overall performance with established guidelines and practice. A small convenience sample of women invited to use the CGP were interviewed, the interviews were taped and transcribed, and a thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: The run time of the programme was 20 minutes, depending on the use of opt outs to default values. The CGP functioned well in preliminary testing. Women were able to use the programme and expressed overall satisfaction with it. Some had reservations about the computerised formal and some were surprised at the specificity of the guidance given. CONCLUSIONS: A CGP can be developed for a complex healthcare decision. It can give evidence-based health guidance which can be adjusted to account for individual risk factors and reflects a patient's own values and preferences concerning health outcomes. Future decision aids and support systems need to be developed and evaluated in a way which takes account of the variation in patients' preferences for inclusion in the decision making process.

Barriers to the use of dental services by individuals from minority ethnic communities living in the United Kingdom: findings from focus groups.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the barriers identified by individuals from minority ethnic communities resident in the United Kingdom to their use of dental services. METHOD: Focus group discussions were held with individuals from minority ethnic groups. Data were analysed using the technique of content analysis on the basis of categories defined by the researchers. FINDINGS: Barriers to regular attendance identified by participants included: language, a mistrust of dentists, cost, anxiety, cultural misunderstandings, concern about standards of hygiene. The type of barrier identified differed between ethnic groups, though mistrust of dentists was common to all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm previous research identifying barriers to the use of dental services. However, for the first time in the United Kingdom, it has been suggested that the nature of the perceived barriers varies across ethnic groups. These findings have implications for attempts to increase use of dental services among individuals from minority ethnic communities.

Self-assessed oral health status of ethnic minority residents of South London.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the self-assessed oral health status of individuals from minority ethnic communities living in South London. METHOD: A sample of 1,057 individuals from minority ethnic communities (as defined by Office of Censuses and Surveys categories) resident in South London were asked to complete measures of their oral and facial symptoms, the impact of their oral health on their daily functioning and of their satisfaction with the appearance of their teeth and gums. MEASURES: Self-assessed oral health status was determined by means of two short scales addressing oral symptoms and the impact of oral health on activities of daily living. Satisfaction with the appearance of the teeth and gums was also assessed. FINDINGS: No significant differences were found between minority ethnic communities in the number of symptoms reported, in the level of impact which such symptoms cause, or in their dissatisfaction with the appearance of their teeth and gums. Reporting of symptoms and impact were mildly though significantly correlated with dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be little difference between ethnic communities in their reporting of oral and facial symptoms, though these groups report higher levels of dissatisfaction with the appearance of their teeth and gums. Social and demographic factors play an important role in determining perceptions of oral health. The findings should be interpreted with caution given the difficulty of sampling minority ethnic communities and the subsequent limited representativeness of the sample.