Cost-effectiveness of Lutetium [177Lu] oxodotreotide versus best supportive care with octreotide in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors in France.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In France, there are approximately 2,400 new cases of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) annually. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-Dotatate plus long-acting repeatable [LAR] octreotide 30 mg has been shown to significantly improve progression-free survival and overall survival relative to high-dose octreotide LAR 60 mg in patients with unresectable or metastatic progressive midgut NETs. A long-term cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to assess whether 177Lu-Dotatate is a cost-effective option versus octreotide 60 mg for patients with unresectable/metastatic progressive midgut NETs from the perspective of French healthcare payer. METHODS: The analysis was performed using a three-state partitioned survival model. In the base case analysis 177Lu-Dotatate plus octreotide LAR 30 mg was compared with high-dose octreotide LAR 60 mg in patients with midgut NETs. Survival data were obtained from the phase III NETTER-1 trial in patients with metastatic midgut NETs. Future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 4% per annum. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the base case analysis, for patients with midgut NETs, 177Lu-Dotatate treatment improved quality-adjusted life expectancy by 1.21 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) relative to octreotide LAR 60 mg and the lifetime treatment costs were EUR 50,784 higher with 177Lu-Dotatate resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of EUR 42,106 per QALY gained versus octreotide LAR 60 mg. When compared with everolimus, 177Lu-Dotatate was associated with an ICER of EUR 59,769 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses showed that the results were sensitive to methods used to extrapolate survival data. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with advanced progressive midgut NETs 177Lu-Dotatate is likely to be considered a cost-effective option versus octreotide 60 mg from the perspective of the French healthcare payer.

[Cost-effectiveness of transurethral resection of the bladder with blue light in patients with non muscle invasive bladder cancer in France]. / Coût-efficacité de la résection transurétrale de vessie en lumière bleue chez les patients atteints d'un cancer de la vessie non infiltrant en France.

OBJECTIVE: Photodynamic diagnosis after instillation of hexylaminolevulinate (Hexvix(®)) during transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) helps in the detection of tumors and results in a reduction of recurrence. The medical and economic impact of fluorescence compared to conventional white light TURB needed to be analyzed in the French healthcare system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medical and economic impact of the blue light TURB in the treatment of NMIBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cost-utility model, based on data from the literature and expert opinions, combining a decision tree and a Markov model was used to simulate the initial management after a first TURB of all new patients diagnosed with symptoms consistent with NMIBC and outcomes at short and long terms. In this model, the initial TURB could be achieved either with fluorescence in addition to white light, or with white light only. The main criteria of the model was based on the quality adjusted life years (QALY). The economic evaluation focused on the direct costs. The test's results and costs were determined from diagnosis until death of patients. RESULTS: The use of photodynamic diagnosis during TURB resulted in an improvement in QALYs (0.075) and a reduction of € 670 of the costs compared to the conventional treatment with white light. Thus, the blue light resection was defined as a strategy called "dominant" over the TURB in white light. CONCLUSION: In the context of the French health system, the model of the study showed that the blue light cystoscopy during TURB was associated with increased QALYs and reduced health spending. This kind of result is rare in oncology. This health economic analysis confirms the interest of hexylaminolevulinate acid in initial management of NMIBC, according to studies conducted in United Kingdom, Italy and Poland.

Cost-effectiveness of sofosbuvir in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C.

In France, 190,306 patients were suffering from chronic hepatitis C in 2012. These patients have a decreased life expectancy and are susceptible to complications associated with chronic hepatitis. Current treatments are poorly tolerated and their effectiveness varies depending on the genotype of the virus. Sofosbuvir, a new class of treatment, has demonstrated in five phase III trials sustained viral response (SVR) rates of over 90% across genotypes, higher than current treatments and has a tolerance profile similar to placebo. The objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of using sofosbuvir in the treatment of chronic HCV infection. A Markov model was used to compare treatment strategies with and without sofosbuvir. The model simulated the natural history of HCV infection. SVR rates were based on data from clinical trials. Utilities associated with different stages of disease were based on data from the literature. French direct medical costs were used. Price for sofosbuvir was the price used in the early access program for severe fibrosis stages. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for sofosbuvir versus current reference treatments was € 16,278/QALY and varied from 40,000 €/QALY for F0 stages to 12,080 €/QALY for F4 stages. The sensitivity analyses carried out confirmed the robustness of this result. Sofosbuvir is a cost-effective treatment option for patients with hepatitis C.