Intermodel comparison for the radiological assessment of the Zapadnoe and Tessenderlo case studies with implications for selection of remediation strategy.

Risk assessment provides a key input for determining the need for and extent of remedial actions necessary for sites contaminated with naturally occurring radioactive material or nuclear legacy sites. The choice of a modelling approach for risk assessment, and the corresponding toolsets should fit the assessment context, taking account of the complexity, and be clearly related to the questions to be addressed in the decision-making process. One of the objectives of Working Group 1 of IAEA Modelling and Data for Radiological Impact Assessments II (MODARIA II) Programme is to perform intermodel comparisons for case studies of selected sites, in particular, to help illustrate the applicability of different models and approaches as inputs to decision-making processes. This intercomparison exercise, which included the analysis of potential consequences on the management strategy for contaminated sites, has been performed for two sites: The former uranium mill tailings facility at Zapadnoe, Ukraine, and the phosphate processing facility at Tessenderlo, Belgium. Several models and computer codes have been used for one or both of these cases: AMBER, GoldSim, NORM And LegacY Site Assessment, Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRG)-dose compliance concentration calculator, and RESRAD-OFFSITE. The assessments explore the implications of using differing assessment frameworks and assumptions, as well as alternative modelling tools, on model outputs and as input for corresponding decisions on remediation strategy. This paper reviews both similarities and differences in the results of assessments performed using these different models. It discusses how different approaches can complement one another to help build confidence in the evidence base underpinning decisions. It also discusses the appropriateness of the different modelling approaches in a given assessment context. In one of the case studies in particular (Tessenderlo case study), the remediation strategy is essentially driven by the contamination of the site with heavy metals, such as cadmium. This has significant consequences on the choice of the most adequate approaches and scenarios for assessing the radiological risk and balancing their relative importance with other impacts. The development of a holistic approach to risk assessment is, therefore, highlighted.

Dosimetric verification and commissioning for a small animal image-guided irradiator.

In recent years, small animal image-guided irradiators have been widely utilized in preclinical studies involving rodent models. However, the dosimetry commissioning of such equipment involving kilovoltage small-field dosimetry has not received as much interest as the megavoltage small-field dosimetry used clinically. To date, a paucity of measured kilovoltage beam data, especially for field sizes less than 3 mm, can be found in the literature. For improvement of rodent treatments in the future, this work aims to provide comprehensive and accurate beam data for the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP, Xstrahl) using EBT3 Gafchromic films and Monte Carlo calculation, with submillimeter resolution and accuracy. This work includes three primary tasks: (1) establish an optimized film measurement protocol for small field dosimetry of kilovoltage photon beam. (2) Acquire dosimetric data including (a) depth dose curves from the surface to 6 cm depth (b) beam profiles, (c) penumbra, (d) cone factors and (e) 2D dose distribution. These tasks were undertaken for a 220 kVp photon beam with five different small field widths and 33 cm source to surface distance (0.5 mm and 1 mm circular fields, 3 × 3 mm2, 5 × 5 mm2, 10 × 10 mm2 square fields). Beam data was measured with EBT3 films. (3) Provide comparative dosimetry for film measurements, Monte Carlo calculations, and the dose calculations performed with the SARRP treatment planning system, Muriplan. For the majority of parameters, film measurement agreed with Monte Carlo simulation within 1%. There were, however, discrepancies between measured beam data and Muriplan treatment planning data. Specifically, for PDD, Muriplan underestimates the dose for field sizes of 0.5 mm and 1 mm. For beam profiles comparisons, the calculation from Muriplan predicts a smaller lateral distance between the 50% isodose lines compared to film measurement. There is a difference of 0.18, 0.72, 0.6 mm between Muriplan and film for field sizes of 3, 5, 10 mm, respectively. This work demonstrates that accurate and precise kilovoltage small-field dosimetry can be conducted using EBT3 Gafchromic film with an optimized protocol. In addition, discrepancies between measured beam data and Muriplan were identified.

Quality Assessment of Stereotactic Radiosurgery of a Melanoma Brain Metastases Model Using a Mouselike Phantom and the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform.

PURPOSE: To establish a novel preclinical model for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with combined mouselike phantom quality assurance in the setting of brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: C57B6 mice underwent intracranial injection of B16-F10 melanoma cells. T1-weighted postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on day 11 after injection. The MRI images were fused with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP). The gross tumor volume (GTV) was contoured using the MRI. A single sagittal arc using the 3 × 3 mm2 collimator was used to deliver 18 Gy prescribed to the isocenter. MRI was performed 7 days after radiation treatment, and the dose delivered to the mice was confirmed using 2 mouselike anthropomorphic phantoms: 1 in the axial orientation and the other in the sagittal orientation. The SARRP output was measured using a PTW Farmer type ionization chamber as per the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group report 61, and the H-D curve was generated up to a maximum dose of 30 Gy. Irradiated films were analyzed based on optical density distribution and H-D curve. RESULTS: The tumor volume on day 11, before intervention, was 2.48 ± 1.37 mm3 in the no-SRS arm versus 3.75 ± 1.19 mm3 in the SRS arm (NS). In the SRS arm, GTV maximum dose (Dmax) and mean dose were 2048 ± 207 and 1785 ± 14 cGy. Using the mouselike phantoms, the radiochromic film showed close precision in comparison with projected isodose lines, with a Dmax of 1903.4 and 1972.7 cGy, the axial and sagittal phantoms, respectively. Tumor volume 7 days after treatment was 7.34 ± 8.24 mm3 in the SRS arm and 60.20 ± 40.4 mm3 in the no-SRS arm (P=.009). No mice in the control group survived more than 22 days after implantation, with a median overall survival (mOS) of 19 days; mOS was not reached in the SRS group, with 1 death noted. CONCLUSIONS: Single-fraction SRS of 18 Gy delivered in a single arc can be delivered accurately with MRI T1-weighted postcontrast-based treatment planning. The mouse like phantom allows for verification of dose delivery and accuracy.