Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Sci Transl Med ; 8(345): 345ps14, 2016 06 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27358496

RESUMO

Vaccines have the potential to transform the health of all individuals and to reduce the health inequality between rich and poor countries. However, to achieve these goals, it is no longer sufficient to prioritize vaccine development using cost-effectiveness as the sole indicator. During a symposium entitled "Mission Grand Convergence-The Role of Vaccines," held in Siena, Italy, in July 2015, key stakeholders agreed that the prioritization of vaccine development and deployment must use multicriteria decision-making based on the following core concepts: (i) mortality and severity of the disease, (ii) vaccine safety considerations, and (iii) economic evaluation that captures the full benefits of vaccination.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Vacinas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Vacinas/efeitos adversos
4.
Vaccine ; 30(50): 7253-9, 2012 Nov 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23063829

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) reported to the national Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) represent true causally related events, as well as events that are temporally, but not necessarily causally related to vaccine. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if the causal relationships between the vaccine and the AEFI reported to VAERS could be assessed through expert review. DESIGN: A stratified random sample of 100 VAERS reports received in 2004 contained 13 fatal cases, 19 cases with non-fatal disabilities, 39 other serious non-fatal cases and 29 non-serious cases. Experts knowledgeable about vaccines and clinical outcomes, reviewed each VAERS report and available medical records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Modified World Health Organization criteria were used to classify the causal relationship between vaccines and AEFI as definite, probable, possible, unlikely or unrelated. Five independent reviewers evaluated each report. If they did not reach a majority agreement on causality after initial review, the report was discussed on a telephone conference to achieve agreement. RESULTS: 108 AEFIs were identified in the selected 100 VAERS reports. After initial review majority agreement was achieved for 83% of the AEFI and 17% required further discussion. In the end, only 3 (3%) of the AEFI were classified as definitely causally related to vaccine received. Of the remaining AEFI 22 (20%) were classified as probably and 22 (20%) were classified as possibly related to vaccine received; a majority (53%) were classified as either unlikely or unrelated to a vaccine received. CONCLUSIONS: Using VAERS reports and additional documentation, causality could be assessed by expert review in the majority of VAERS reports. Assessment of VAERS reports identified that causality was thought to be probable or definite in less than one quarter of reports, and these were dominated by local reactions, allergic reactions, or symptoms known to be associated with the vaccine administered.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causalidade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Infect Dis ; 197 Suppl 2: S139-42, 2008 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18419387

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Varicella vaccine currently is recommended for children between 12 and 18 months of age. However, rates of breakthrough varicella have been reported to be higher among children vaccinated before 14 or 15 months of age and to increase with time since vaccination. METHODS: An ongoing study at the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program is evaluating vaccine efficacy in 7585 children vaccinated with Varivax in 1995, when they were between 12 and 23 months of age. Cases of chickenpox are identified by telephone interviews with each child's parent(s) every 6 months. Mean age at varicella onset and mean time from vaccination to onset were calculated on the basis of age, in months, at vaccination. Logistic regression was used to test for trend, and the chi2 test was used to test for differences in rates of breakthrough varicella by age. RESULTS: Over the first 8 years of the study, a total of 1161 cases of breakthrough varicella were reported, for an average rate of 21.7 cases/1000 person-years. Vaccine effectiveness was 83.6% at year 8. The rate of breakthrough varicella did not change for each additional month of age at vaccination (P = .864), and no difference in the rate of breakthrough varicella was found between children vaccinated at <15 months of age and those vaccinated at > or =15 months of age. CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not show a difference in vaccine effectiveness with age at vaccination and thus support the current recommendations for initial vaccination between 12 and 18 months of age.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Varicela/epidemiologia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Fatores Etários , California , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Vaccine ; 24(2): 151-6, 2006 Jan 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16122845

RESUMO

There is little information on the safety of administration of a third dose of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV). The authors conducted a retrospective assessment of 316,995 adult members of three health maintenance organizations who had received one, two, or three PPV doses. Medical encounters associated with diagnosis codes potentially indicative of an injection site reaction in the week following a first, second, or third PPV dose were identified. These presumptive events occurred in 0.3% (911/279504) of the first PPV group, 0.7% (257/36888) of the second PPV group, and 0.5% (3/603) of the third PPV group (p>0.5 for both comparisons with the third PPV group). These findings do not suggest that a third PPV dose is associated with an increased risk of medically attended injection site reactions compared with a first or second PPV dose.


Assuntos
Imunização Secundária/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde , Humanos , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA