Clinical implementation of a multidirectional, angular stable osteosynthesis system in maxillofacial traumatology.

AIM: To investigate whether a multidirectional, angular stable osteosynthesis system is suitable for the treatment of mandibular fractures and to compare it with well established available systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Following preliminary testing in an animal model, the multidirectional angular stable system TiFix 2.3 obtained from Litos (Hamburg, Germany) was utilised for internal fixation of 39 mandibular fractures. These involved four symphyseal fractures, 17 parasymphyseal, 16 of the angle of the mandible and two comminuted fractures. The surgical and postoperative course was closely scrutinised. Radiographs were taken after 6 months and all plates removed under local anaesthesia. Photographs were taken intraoperatively and the plates and surrounding soft tissues were salvaged for histological analysis. Additionally, these operations were compared with treatment of equivalent fractures which were treated with conventional, non-angular stable systems. The relative costs have also been evaluated. RESULTS: In 33 of the 39 fractures one TiFix plate sufficed for osteosynthesis. The plate most often used was a 2-hole plate which was applied in 25 (55.5%) fractures, followed by the 4-hole plates used in 16 (35.5%) fractures. In two comminuted fractures, four 6-hole plates were used (9%). In 17 patients the operation lasted less than 30 min, in 20 patients less than 60 min, in two less than 120 min. In all cases, the operations were shorter, and due to the plates' dimensions fewer screws had to be used, thus reducing the costs. DISCUSSION: This angular stable system enabled reduction of the amount of the implant material. Also reduced were the operation time and the cost of the procedure. Furthermore, in the future it will allow smaller access incisions and better preservation of the soft tissue integrity.

Retrospective assessment of the peri-implant mucosa of implants inserted in reanastomosed or free bone grafts from the fibula or iliac crest.

PURPOSE: To investigate the susceptibility of implants to inflammation following autogenous bone transplantation and to evaluate whether various factors affect outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional clinical investigation involved patients who were treated between the years 1994 and 1996. The donor site, mode of transplantation, primary disease, gender, smoking habits, and age were evaluated with respect to outcomes. Clinical and radiologic assessments were the basis for the classification into 3 categories: (1) no inflammation, (2) mucositis, and (3) peri-implantitis. Lost implants were also noted. The data were evaluated statistically to determine whether significant differences existed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (23 men and 20 women) were involved in this retrospective study. These patients received a total of 216 oral implants over a follow-up time of 8 to 10 years. Depending on the type of reconstruction, rates of peri-implant inflammation between 9% and 38% were observed. For mucositis, rates of 16.3% to 24.1% were seen, and 30% to 70.9% of sites showed no inflammation. CONCLUSION: High rates of soft tissue inflammation adjacent to implants were observed. The choice of donor site in conjunction with the mode of transplantation seemed to influence the development of peri-implant inflammation. The microsurgically reanastomosed fibula seemed most resistant to inflammatory processes, followed by the microsurgically reanastomosed iliac crest, free iliac crest, and free fibula. No significant differences could be observed for primary disease. These findings should be taken into consideration prior to surgery and when establishing individual recall systems.