Sex, defense, and risk assessment: Who could ask for anything more?

Over the 30 years since IBNS was founded, a central theme of "Translation" has emerged. This reflects increasing realization that mental disorders such as anxiety and depression are extremely widespread, expensive and painful to societies and individuals across the world. The Blanchard lab has been particularly involved in attempts to understand the evolutionary and functional mechanisms underlying defensive behaviors as a focal component of these disorders. This involved analysis of the relationships between threatening situations/stimuli, and the behaviors (flight, freezing, fight, and risk assessment) that respond to them, for rodents; and also attempts to link these relationships to human responsivity to similar threatening events: Linkages that are complicated by factors such as domestication and sex. In particular it is important to describe and characterize the organization of defensive patterns in people as well as nonhuman animals, and to understand how these patterns can become nonfunctional and pathological.

Risk assessment and serotonin: Animal models and human psychopathologies.

Risk assessment (RA) is an evolved, generally adaptive, mechanism comprising focused attention and appraisal of potential threat stimuli and situations. Initially characterized in animal models, it provides a number of behavioral and functional parallels to patterns of rumination, gaze biases, and other forms of affective cognition that appear to be disregulated in depression and anxiety. Serotonergic mechanisms are involved in these mood disorders, and an emerging body of evidence suggests that they may modulate the affective cognitive changes common to such psychopathologies. Findings of parallel effects of serotonin systems in RA would support a view that it may provide a useful behavioral endophenotype for translational research on mood disorders. This review examines the involvement of serotonergic mechanisms in both animal models of RA, and in an array of tasks focusing on affective cognitive changes in individuals with depression or anxiety. Results suggest substantial serotonin involvement in both RA behaviors measured in rats or mice, and in the "intersection of emotional and cognitive processes" [43] in people.

Risk assessment as an evolved threat detection and analysis process.

Risk assessment is a pattern of activities involved in detection and analysis of threat stimuli and the situations in which the threat is encountered. It is a core process in the choice of specific defenses, such as flight, freezing, defensive threat and defensive attack, that counter the threat and minimize the danger it poses. This highly adaptive process takes into account important characteristics, such as type and location (including distance from the subject) of the threat, as well as those (e.g. presence of an escape route or hiding place) of the situation, combining them to predict which specific defense is optimal with that particular combination of threat and situation. Risk assessment is particularly associated with ambiguity either of the threat stimulus or of the outcome of available defensive behaviors. It is also crucial in determining that threat is no longer present, permitting a return to normal, nondefensive behavior. Although risk assessment has been described in detail in rodents, it is also a feature of human defensive behavior, particularly in association with ambiguity. Rumination may be a specifically human form of risk assessment, more often expressed by women, and highly associated with anxiety. Risk assessment behaviors respond to drugs effective against generalized anxiety disorder; however, flight, a dominant specific defense in many common situations, shows a pharmacological response profile closer to that of panic disorder. Risk assessment and flight also appear to show some consistent differences in terms of brain regional activation patterns, suggesting a potential biological differentiation of anxiety and fear/panic systems. An especially intriguing possibility is that mirror neurons may respond to some of the same types of situational differences that are analyzed during risk assessment, suggesting an additional functional role for these neurons.