Assessment of the Value of Registries in Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Reverse Arthroplasty as an Example. / Die Wertigkeit von Endoprothesenregistern in der Schulterendoprothetik am Beispiel der inversen Endoprothese.

INTRODUCTION: As a consequence of the Swedish model, endoprosthesis registers have become increasingly important worldwide. Due to the increasing number of joint replacements at the shoulder, these are being increasingly included in the register databases - in addition to interventions at the hip and knee joint. In this study, the value of endoprosthesis registers is investigated, using the example of shoulder endoprosthetics and including a comparison with clinical studies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The annual reports of 32 different endoprosthesis registers with data on hip, knee and/or shoulder arthroplasty were analysed. The number of operations and demographic patient data for all areas of endoprosthetics were examined. In addition, a more detailed consideration of variables such as the primary diagnosis, the cause of the revision, the revision rate depending on risk factors and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM scores) was carried out exclusively for the shoulder joint endoprostheses. Using the example of the inverse shoulder prosthesis, clinical studies were compared to registry data with special regard to the revision rate. RESULTS: A total of 20 endoprosthesis registers could be included, 9 of these collected data on shoulder arthroplasty. The main primary diagnoses were osteoarthritis (40.6%), rotator cuff defect arthropathy (30.2%) and fractures (17.6%). The most commonly used shoulder joint endoprosthesis was the inverse prosthesis (47.3%). The proportion of revision surgeries in total shoulder arthroplasty operations was less than 10% in all registers. In addition to the revision rate, the PROM scores were sometimes used in the registers to evaluate the success of the prosthesis. Compared to registry data, clinical studies showed more heterogeneous data with a significantly higher revision rate of over 10% in long-term follow-up - using the example of the inverse shoulder prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Register data are a valuable source of information in shoulder arthroplasty and can make a significant contribution to the quality assurance of endoprosthetic treatments. Compared to clinical studies, they primarily provide data on durability of different endoprosthesis and give lower revision rates. Clinical studies use PROM scores and clinical and radiological examinations to focus only on individual implants and surgical centres on the one hand and much more on the functional results on the other.

Assessment of popliteal neurovascular safety during all-inside suturing of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus using Upright MRIs of the knee joint.

BACKGROUND: To examine the risk of injury to the popliteal neurovascular bundle (pNVB) during all-inside repair of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (PHLM) using Upright-MRIs. METHODS: Upright-MRIs of 61 knees in extension (ext) and 90°-flexion (flex) were included. Distance D from the PHLM to the pNVB was compared between extended and 90°-flexed position, subgroups with/without joint-effusion and evaluated according to demographics. Portal safety was assessed simulating suturing of the PHLM via four arthroscopy portals. Distance d (shortest space from the simulated suturing-device trajectory lines to the pNVB) was compared among portals in increasing distances from the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). RESULTS: D is longer in flex (17.3 ± 6.0 mm) than in ext (11.3 ± 4.2 mm, p < 0.0001). MRIs with joint-effusion displayed longer values of D than scans without joint-effusion (flex: 20.4 ± 7.1 mm vs. 16.1 ± 5.2 mm, p = 0.012). Shorter distances are associated with female gender, lower body weight and lower BMI. At 0 mm from the PCL, the 1 cm-lateral portal was the safest (p < 0.0001) whereas at 3 mm/6mm/9mm/12 mm the 1 cm-medial portal showed the longest d values (p < 0.0001 each). CONCLUSION: All-inside suturing of the PHLM is safer in 90°-flexion, in presence of intraarticular fluid and in male patients with increasing weight/BMI. Sutures of the PHLM at 0 mm from the PCL are safer from a 1 cm-lateral portal whereas for tears located ≥ 3 mm from the PCL a 1 cm-medial portal involves a lower neurovascular risk. Upright-MRI proves excellent for preoperative planning to minimize neurovascular risks.

Clinical assessment is sufficient to allow outcome evaluation following surgical management of Achilles tendon ruptures.

STUDY DESIGN: cross-sectional study in otherwise healthy athletic adults with a unilateral Achilles tendon rupture. OBJECTIVES: define the relationships of active range of motion, calf circumference or number of heel raises to a full set of isokinetic parameters. BACKGROUND: Achilles tendon ruptures commonly occur during sports and create a considerable amount of morbidity. The benefits of different treatments are difficult to determine. Complex and expensive isokinetic testing is often required. If a simple force measurement could replace this testing, large clinical trials would be more easily feasible. METHODS: 74 patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture and surgical treatment were evaluated retrospectively. Active range of motion (ROM), ratio of ROM, number of heel raises, ratio of heel raises, calf circumference and isokintetic measurements were recorded. Regression using a Bayesian elastic net showed the most important correlations. RESULTS: Active range of motion showed a significant correlation to peak torque angle at flexion and extension as well as increased sports activity. There was a negative correlation to percutaneous therapy. Active Heel raise showed a positive correlation to peak torque at dorsal extension and increased sports activity as well as a negative correlation to high postoperative pain, where as calf circumference was positive correlated to peak torque at dorsal extension and body height as well as negative correlated to female gender. CONCLUSION: device independent measures, like range of Motion, and amount of Heel raise, are an excellent tool providing similar information compared to isokinetic testing and could be used to evaluate clinical outcome after Achilles tendon rupture.