Development and Evaluation of a Patient Cirrhosis Knowledge Assessment.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Self-management skills improve outcomes for patients with cirrhosis. While education programs exist to teach these skills, there are limited patient assessments to evaluate their efficacy. We aimed to develop and evaluate cirrhosis knowledge assessments for patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: Across two institutions, a 4-stage process was undertaken: first, we developed a comprehensive set of questions regarding cirrhosis self-management. Second, the questions underwent critical review by patients and hepatology providers. Third, patients with cirrhosis answered these questions before and after a written educational tool. Questions were updated based on results. Fourth, patients answered the updated questions before and after a video educational tool. Binomial test or paired sample t-test was used to compare pre- and post-tests depending on question type. RESULTS: In phase 3, 134 patients completed pre- and post-tests. 44% were decompensated, 81% were diagnosed with cirrhosis at least 3 years, and 52% were 60-75 years. 95% of single-answer questions were answered correctly by at least 70% of patients in the pre-test. None of the answers improved significantly with education. After phase 3, 6 questions were removed and 6 questions were edited to increase challenge. In phase 4, 96 patients (42 compensated, 54 decompensated) completed pre- and post-tests. In the compensated assessment, 3 questions improved after education and the summative score increased (7.9 to 9.0, P < 0.001). In the decompensated assessment, 4 questions improved after education and the summative score increased (7.0 to 7.7, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Through a rigorous process, we created and evaluated cirrhosis knowledge assessments for patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Further validation is required and then these assessments can be used to improve patient education.

A Telemonitoring Intervention for Cirrhotic Ascites Management Is Cost-Saving.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis and ascites experience frequent hospital admissions, leading to poor quality of life and high healthcare costs. Monitoring weight is a component of ascites care and telemonitoring may improve outcomes and costs. Goals We aimed to evaluate the cost and outcomes of current care compared to a telemonitoring system for ascites. Study We developed a decision-analytic model that examined 100 simulated patients over a 6-month horizon. We compared usual care to a new telemonitoring program, which we estimate costs $50,000/6 months. RESULTS: The cost of standard of care for 100 patients with cirrhotic ascites over a 6-month period is $167,500 more expensive than telemonitoring. By varying parameter probabilities by ± 10% and outcome costs by ± 20%, we found that standard of care remains more expensive than care with a telemonitoring intervention by $9400 to $340,200 per 6-month period. Standard of care leads to 9 more admissions (range 4 to 12) than a telemonitoring intervention, while telemonitoring leads to 9 more outpatient visits (range 6 to 9) and 28 additional outpatient large volume paracenteses (LVPs) (range 17 to 28). With more and less expensive telemonitoring interventions, standard of care remained more expensive. With 50% adherence to the intervention, standard of care was $89,848 more expensive. CONCLUSIONS: In almost all probability and cost scenarios, a telemonitoring intervention is cost-saving for the management of cirrhotic ascites. Using hospital admissions as a surrogate for quality of care, patient outcomes are improved primarily though more proactive medical intervention and more LVPs.

Hepatic Encephalopathy is Associated With Slow Speech on Objective Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: There are no available low-burden, point-of-care tests to diagnose, grade, and predict hepatic encephalopathy (HE). METHODS: We evaluated speech as a biomarker of HE in 76 English-speaking adults with cirrhosis. RESULTS: Three speech features significantly correlated with the following neuropsychiatric scores: speech rate, word duration, and use of particles. Patients with low neuropsychiatric scores had slower speech (22 words/min, P = 0.01), longer word duration (0.09 seconds/word, P = 0.01), and used fewer particles (0.85% fewer, P = 0.01). Patients with a history of overt HE had slower speech (23 words/min, P = 0.005) and longer word duration (0.09 seconds/word, P = 0.005). DISCUSSION: HE is associated with slower speech.