Social Needs Screening in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Addressing adverse social determinants of health is an upstream approach to potentially improve child health outcomes and health equity. We aimed to determine if systematically screening and referring for social needs in hospitalized pediatric patients increased families' enrollment in publicly available resources. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial at a large urban children's hospital enrolled English-speaking caregivers of patients 0 to 36 months of age on the general pediatrics service from June 2016 to July 2017. The intervention arm received the WE CARE Houston social needs intervention (screener and resource referrals based on screening results and receptiveness to help); the control arm received standard of care. Baseline social risk data were collected for all participants. Caregivers who screened positive for mental health need, substance abuse, or domestic violence received additional support, including from social workers. The primary outcome was enrollment in resources at 6 months postdischarge. Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed to identify associations. RESULTS: Our study sample consisted of 413 caregivers from diverse sociodemographic/socioeconomic backgrounds. Overall, 85% of study participants had ≥1 social risk (median 2, range 0-9). WE CARE Houston identified caregiver employment, health insurance, primary care physician, depression, childcare, smoking, and food resources as the most prevalent social needs. Among these, caregivers were most receptive to resources for childcare, mental health, health insurance, and primary care. There was no significant difference in enrollment in new resources by study arm. CONCLUSION: Screening for social needs in the hospital is feasible and can result in the identification of social needs, but further work is needed to successfully address these needs.

Public Benefit Use and Social Needs in Hospitalized Children With Undocumented Parents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies supporta recent decline in public benefit enrollment among immigrant families. We aimed to describe health and resource use, barriers to use, and immigration-related fear in families with undocumented parents compared with families without undocumented parents. We also aimed to assess associations with discontinuation of public benefits and fear of deportation. METHODS: We assessed immigration concerns and enrollment in Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) with an 89-item anonymous, cross-sectional survey of English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers of hospitalized children. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations with discontinuation of public benefits and fear of deportation. RESULTS: Of 527 families approached, 399 enrolled (105 with 1 or more undocumented parent, 275 with no undocumented parent, and 19 with undisclosed immigration status). Compared with families without undocumented parents, families with undocumented parents had higher levels of poverty and food insecurity. Controlling for perceived eligibility, public benefit use was similar across groups. Of families with undocumented parents, 29% reported public benefit discontinuation because of immigration concerns, and 71% reported fear of deportation. Having an undocumented parent was associated with public benefit disenrollment (odds ratio: 46.7; 95% confidence interval: 5.9-370.4) and fear of deportation (odds ratio: 24.3; 95% confidence interval: 9.6-61.9). CONCLUSIONS: Although families with undocumented parents had higher levels of poverty and food insecurity compared with families without undocumented parents, public benefit use was similar between groups. Immigration-related fear may be a barrier to public benefit use in this population.

Inpatient Food Insecurity in Caregivers of Hospitalized Pediatric Patients: A Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Among US households with children, 14% are food insecure. Household food insecurity (FI) is associated with poorer health outcomes and increased hospital admissions. There is less known about caregivers' ability to obtain adequate food during hospitalization (inpatient FI). METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study of primary caregivers of hospitalized children 0 to 18 years. A modified US Household Food Security Survey was used to identify inpatient FI. Associated factors were identified using logistic regression adjusted for covariables. Caregiver semistructured interviews were conducted to elicit perceptions on food accessibility and effects of and solutions for inpatient FI. RESULTS: The prevalence of inpatient FI was 43%. Household FI was present in 38% of families. Inpatient FI was associated with household FI (P < .01). In multivariable analysis, odds of inpatient FI were increased among caregivers with annual household income <$30,000 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.14), public transportation use (aOR 6.33), living >30 miles from the hospital (aOR 2.80), self-rated fair/poor health (aOR 3.31), maternity leave (aOR 4.75), and past/current Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefit utilization (aOR 2.52). Qualitative analysis identified barriers to food access, such as lack of affordable options, and found that caregivers made sacrifices for their hospitalized child, including skipping meals. Caregivers viewed their presence at their child's bedside and personal nourishment as important factors affecting their child's care. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient FI may affect a significant proportion of hospitalized children's caregivers. Pediatric hospitals should ensure that caregivers have access to food in order to fully engage in their child's care.

Reorienting Orientation: Introducing the Social Determinants of Health to First-Year Medical Students.

Introduction: Medical students rarely learn about the intersection of socioeconomic and environmental effects on access to health care and maintenance of health. Case-based discussion can cohesively highlight the social determinants of health to complement preclinical education. Our modules can foster future interest in working with vulnerable populations, help students recognize barriers to care, and identify strategies to help these patients. Methods: The Social Determinants of Health Orientation Program (SDHOP) introduced students to the nonbiomedical factors that contribute to patients' health. Key topics were presented in small discussion groups led by faculty facilitators. The subjects addressed included access to care; immigration/language barriers; lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender health; human trafficking; race/ethnicity; and women's health. Results: The SDHOP initiative was integrated into the formal curriculum and successfully implemented in its first year at our institution. Pre- and postsurveys were administered to assess student satisfaction with the course, as well as changes in knowledge and attitude regarding the topics covered. Of the 186 SDHOP participants, 111 medical students responded to both surveys and reported improvements in both knowledge of and comfort level with these topics and specific related terms. Ninety-one percent rated the overall quality of SDHOP and its individual modules as good or excellent. Discussion: SDHOP contributes to medical education by providing an all-inclusive model for teaching students about the social determinants of health. Our results suggest that presenting these topics in a small-group discussion model improves medical student cultural competency and comfort level with patients of diverse backgrounds.