Pulmonary Hypertension Phenotype Can Be Identified in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Using Echocardiographic Assessment of Pulmonary Artery Pressure With Supportive Use of Pressure Reflection Variables.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is frequent in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with 2 different phenotypes: isolated postcapillary PH (IpcPH) and, with the worst prognosis, combined pre- and postcapillary PH (CpcPH). The aims of the present echocardiography study were to investigate (1) the ability to identify PH phenotype in patients with HFrEF using the newly adopted definition of PH (mean pulmonary artery pressure >20 mm Hg) and (2) the relationship between PH phenotype and right ventricular (RV) function. METHODS: One hundred twenty-four patients with HFrEF consecutively referred for heart transplant or heart failure workup were included with echocardiography and right heart catheterization within 48 hours. We estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAPDoppler) and used a method to detect increased pulmonary vascular resistance (>3 Wood units) based on predefined thresholds of 3 pressure reflection (PRefl) variables (the acceleration time in the RV outflow tract [RVOT], the interval between peak RVOT and peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity, and the RV pressure augmentation following peak RVOT velocity). RESULTS: Using receiver operator characteristic analysis in a derivation group (n = 62), we identified sPAPDoppler ≥35 mm Hg as a cutoff that in a test group (n = 62) increased the likelihood of PH 6.6-fold. The presence of sPAPDoppler >40 mm Hg and 2 or 3 positive PRefl variables increased the probability of CpcPH 6- to 8-fold. A 2-step approach with primarily assessment of sPAPDoppler and the supportive use of PRefl variables in patients with mild/moderate PH (sPAPDoppler 41-59 mm Hg) showed 76% observer agreement and a weighted kappa of 0.63. The steady-state (pulmonary vascular resistance) and pulsatile (compliance, elastance) vascular loading are increased in both IpcPH and CpcPH with a comparable degree of RV dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The PH phenotype can be identified in HFrEF using standard echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary artery pressure with supportive use of PRefl variables in patients with mild to moderate PH.

Real-world treatment patterns, resource use and costs of treating uncontrolled carcinoid syndrome and carcinoid heart disease: a retrospective Swedish study.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs in relation to carcinoid syndrome (CS) and carcinoid heart disease (CHD) in a real-world setting, and to provide perspective on treatment patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient data and HRU were collected retrospectively from three Swedish healthcare registers. Adult patients diagnosed with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) grade 1 or 2 and CS who purchased somatostatin analogs (SSAs), and experienced controlled (defined by SSAs use) and uncontrolled (defined by SSAs dose escalation) CS for ≥8 months during the study period were included. Patients diagnosed with CHD from the date of the GEP-NET diagnosis were included in the CHD study group. RESULTS: Overall, total HRU cost increased with uncontrolled CS and CHD. Total resource cost was 15,500€/patient during controlled CS (8 months), rising to 21,700€/patient during uncontrolled CS (8 months), representing an increase of ∼40% (6200€/patient). Costs/patient were driven mainly by SSA use, tumor-related medical interventions and examinations. The total mean cost/year of disease was 1100€/patient without CHD, compared to 4600€/patient with CHD, a difference of 3500€/patient. Excluding SSA cost burden, the main drivers of increased cost in CHD patients were surgical interventions and echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive overview of the treatment patterns and burden of uncontrolled CS symptoms and CHD using Swedish national register data. Increases in medical interventions and examinations HRU and increased SSA use suggest that SSA dose escalation alone may not effectively control the symptoms associated with uncontrolled CS, highlighting an unmet treatment need in this patient group.