Performance of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index in the Assessment of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Findings From the REAL Study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although telemedicine use has been under discussion for decades, this topic has gained unprecedented importance during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) is a user-friendly tool, fully self-administered, to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of RADAI with other disease activity indices, functional status, and inflammatory markers in a large cohort of RA patients. METHODS: We assessed the concurrent validity of RADAI against Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints-C-reactive protein, Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Simplified Disease Activity Index, and physician assessment of disease activity and the correlation of RADAI with Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and inflammatory markers at the REAL Study baseline. We also evaluated the correlation of the change in RADAI and the change in CDAI over a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: From the 1115 patients included in the REAL Study, 1113 had RADAI scores in the first assessment. At baseline, correlations between RADAI and other disease activity indices were strong, ranging from 0.64 (comparison with physician assessment) to 0.79 (comparison with CDAI). Correlation between the change in RADAI score over the 6 months of follow-up and the change in CDAI score over the same period was moderate/strong for the overall group and within the stratified analyses. CONCLUSION: The strong correlation of RADAI with other well-established tools for disease activity measurement reassures its use with RA patients' follow-up, especially in this new era of telemedicine.

Reliability assessment of the definition of ultrasound enthesitis in SpA: results of a large, multicentre, international, web-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability of the OMERACT US Task Force definition of US enthesitis in SpA. METHODS: In this web exercise, based on the evaluation of 101 images and 39 clips of the main entheses of the lower limbs, the elementary components included in the OMERACT definition of US enthesitis in SpA (hypoechoic areas, entheseal thickening, power Doppler signal at the enthesis, enthesophytes/calcifications, bone erosions) were assessed by 47 rheumatologists from 37 rheumatology centres in 15 countries. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the US components of enthesitis was calculated using Light's kappa, Cohen's kappa, Prevalence And Bias Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) and their 95% CIs. RESULTS: Bone erosions and power Doppler signal at the enthesis showed the highest overall inter-reliability [Light's kappa: 0.77 (0.76-0.78), 0.72 (0.71-0.73), respectively; PABAK: 0.86 (0.86-0.87), 0.73 (0.73-0.74), respectively], followed by enthesophytes/calcifications [Light's kappa: 0.65 (0.64-0.65), PABAK: 0.67 (0.67-0.68)]. This was moderate for entheseal thickening [Light's kappa: 0.41 (0.41-0.42), PABAK: 0.41 (0.40-0.42)], and fair for hypoechoic areas [Light's kappa: 0.37 (0.36-0.38); PABAK: 0.37 (0.37-0.38)]. A similar trend was observed in the intra-reliability exercise, although this was characterized by an overall higher degree of reliability for all US elementary components compared with the inter-observer evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this multicentre, international, web-based study show a good reliability of the OMERACT US definition of bone erosions, power Doppler signal at the enthesis and enthesophytes/calcifications. The low reliability of entheseal thickening and hypoechoic areas raises questions about the opportunity to revise the definition of these two major components for the US diagnosis of enthesitis.

Assisted therapy model for dispensing immunobiological drugs for rheumatoid arthritis by the Brazilian Unified Health System: rational use of resources reduces expenses

Objective: The incorporation of immunobiological agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment at the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) represented a significant advance but had an important impact on the budget. As the current model of direct patient delivery had deficiencies, the CEDMAC model of assisted therapy was implemented to focus on rational use to minimize expenses and increase access. However, there is no data to compare the two models. Thus, this study aimed to compare the number of bottles effectively dispensed by the CEDMAC model to direct dispensing and assess its financial impact. Methods: Care of RA patients at CEDMAC in 2015, whose immunobiological drugs were provided by the Ministry of Health, were included. Drug and dose received, prescribed dose, the number of bottles, cancellations due to contraindication, and absences were recorded. As a comparison, the number of bottles that would be delivered by direct dispensing was estimated. The difference between the total number of bottles dispensed by the two systems and the financial impact of the purchase price in 2015 was calculated. Results: In 2015, CEDMAC provided 3,784 consultations for RA patients. The total number of bottles of immunobiological agents prescribed was 10,000 bottles, and 1,946 (19.5%) were not used for bottle optimization, contraindications, or absenteeism. Unused bottles reduced expenses by R$ 806,132.62. The expansion of the model to the entire SUS would reduce costs by R$ 121,110,388.27. Conclusion: The CEDMAC assisted therapy model considerably reduces the volume of dispensed bottles and can significantly reduce expenses in the supply of immunobiological agents for RA at SUS.

Modelo de terapia assistida para dispensação de medicamentos imunobiológicos para artrite reumatoide no Sistema Único de Saúde: uso racional de recursos reduz despesas / Assisted therapy model for dispensing immunobiological drugs for rheumatoid arthritis by the Brazilian Unified Health System: rational use of resources reduces expenses

Objetivo: A incorporação dos imunobiológicos para tratamento da artrite reumatoide (AR) no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) representou um avanço significativo, porém teve um impacto importante no orçamento. Como o modelo vigente de dispensação direta ao paciente apresentava deficiências, implementou-se o modelo do CEDMAC de terapia assistida com foco no uso racional, visando minimizar despesas e potencializar o alcance. Entretanto, não há dados que comparem os dois modelos. Assim, esse estudo objetivou comparar o número de frascos efetivamente dispensados pelo modelo do CEDMAC à dispensação direta e avaliar seu impacto financeiro. Métodos: Foram incluídos atendimentos de pacientes com AR no CEDMAC em 2015, cujo imunobiológico foi fornecido pelo Ministério da Saúde. Foram registrados medicamento e dose recebidos, dose prescrita, número de frascos, cancelamentos por contraindicação e faltas. Como comparação, foi estimado o número de frascos que seriam entregues pela dispensação direta. Calculou-se a diferença entre o número total de frascos dispensados pelos dois sistemas e o impacto financeiro pelo valor de aquisição em 2015. Resultados: Em 2015, o CEDMAC realizou 3.784 atendimentos para pacientes com AR. O total de frascos de imunobiológicos prescritos foi de 10.000 frascos e 1.946 (19,5%) não foram utilizados por otimização de frascos, contraindicações ou absenteísmo. Os frascos não utilizados reduziram as despesas em R$ 806.132,62. A expansão do modelo para todo SUS reduziria as despesas em R$ 121.110.388,27. Conclusão: O modelo de terapia assistida do CEDMAC reduz consideravelmente o volume de frascos dispensados e pode trazer uma relevante redução de despesas no fornecimento dos imunobiológicos para AR no SUS.

Objective: The incorporation of immunobiologicals for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) represented a significant advance but had an important impact on the budget. As the current model of direct delivery to the patient presented deficiencies, the CEDMAC model of assisted therapy focusing on rational use was implemented to minimize expenses and increase access. However, there is no data comparing the two models. Thus, this study aimed to compare the number of vials effectively dispensed by the CEDMAC model compared to direct delivery and to evaluate its financial impact. Methods: We included RA patients attended at CEDMAC during 2015, whose immunobiological was provided by Ministry of Health. Drug and dose received, prescribed dose, number of vials, cancellations due to contraindication and absences were recorded. As comparison, the number of vials that would be delivered by the direct delivery model were estimated. Savings were calculated by the difference between the total number of vials dispensed by the two systems and the financial impact by acquisition value in 2015. Results: During 2015, CEDMAC performed 3,784 consultations for RA patients. The total number of immunobiological vials prescribed was 10,000 vials and 1,946 (19.5%) were not used for vial optimization, contraindications or absenteeism. Saved vials reduced expenses by R$ 806,132.62. The expansion of the model for all SUS would reduce expenses by R$ 121,110,388.27. Conclusion: CEDMAC's model of assisted therapy considerably reduces the volume of dispensed vials and can bring significant cost offsets in the supply of RA immunobiologicals by SUS.

Reliability assessment of ultrasound muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases: Results of a multicenter international web-based study.

Objectives: To investigate the inter/intra-reliability of ultrasound (US) muscle echogenicity in patients with rheumatic diseases. Methods: Forty-two rheumatologists and 2 radiologists from 13 countries were asked to assess US muscle echogenicity of quadriceps muscle in 80 static images and 20 clips from 64 patients with different rheumatic diseases and 8 healthy subjects. Two visual scales were evaluated, a visual semi-quantitative scale (0-3) and a continuous quantitative measurement ("VAS echogenicity," 0-100). The same assessment was repeated to calculate intra-observer reliability. US muscle echogenicity was also calculated by an independent research assistant using a software for the analysis of scientific images (ImageJ). Inter and intra reliabilities were assessed by means of prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and correlations through Kendall's Tau and Pearson's Rho coefficients. Results: The semi-quantitative scale showed a moderate inter-reliability [PABAK = 0.58 (0.57-0.59)] and a substantial intra-reliability [PABAK = 0.71 (0.68-0.73)]. The lowest inter and intra-reliability results were obtained for the intermediate grades (i.e., grade 1 and 2) of the semi-quantitative scale. "VAS echogenicity" showed a high reliability both in the inter-observer [ICC = 0.80 (0.75-0.85)] and intra-observer [ICC = 0.88 (0.88-0.89)] evaluations. A substantial association was found between the participants assessment of the semi-quantitative scale and "VAS echogenicity" [ICC = 0.52 (0.50-0.54)]. The correlation between these two visual scales and ImageJ analysis was high (tau = 0.76 and rho = 0.89, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this large, multicenter study highlighted the overall good inter and intra-reliability of the US assessment of muscle echogenicity in patients with different rheumatic diseases.

Discordance between the patient's and physician's global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: Data from the REAL study-Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Discordance between patient's global assessment (PtGA) and physician's global assessment (PhGA) has been described in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Understanding the reasons for this discrepancy is important in the context of treat-to-target treatment strategy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the determinants of PtGA and PhGA and factors associated with discordance between them. METHODS: The REAL study included RA patients from Brazilian public health centers. Clinical, laboratory and outcomes measures were collected. PtGA and the PhGA were rated on a visual analog scale and analyzed. Three groups were defined: no discordance (difference between PtGA and PhGA within 3 cm), positive discordance (PtGA exceeding PhGA by >3 cm), and negative discordance (PtGA less than PhGA by >3 cm). Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify determinants of PtGA and PhGA and their discordance. RESULTS: 1115 patients (89,4% female, mean age 56.7y and median disease duration of 12.7y) were enrolled. Two factors were associated with PtGA in the final multivariate model: one point increase in the pain scale leads to an increase of 0.62 in PtGA; one point increase in HAQ increases by 9,25 points the PtGA. The factors associated with PhGA were pain scale, number of tender and swollen joints (NTJ and NSJ), positive RF, ESR, HAQ-DI and use of corticosteroids. Discordance between patient and physician was found in 30.52%: positive discordance in 24.6% and negative discordance in 5.92%. An increase of one point in the NSJ was associated with a 12% increase in the chance of negative discordance. The chance of positive discordance increased by 90% and 2% for each unit increased in HAQ-DI and pain scale respectively. Finally, the chance of positive discordance decreased by 3% for each point increased in NTJ and by 15% for each point increased in NSJ. CONCLUSION: In one-third of the assessments, there was disagreement between PtGA and PhGA (a positive discordance was found in 80% of them). Pain and function were determinants for patients to estimate disease activity, while swollen joints was the main factor related to a worse physician's evaluation. These data show how different can be the perspectives of patients and assistants.

Real - rheumatoid arthritis in real life -study cohort: a sociodemographic profile of rheumatoid arthritis in Brazil

Abstract Background: In Brazil, socioeconomic differences in the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been demonstrated, which are important in the formulation of hypotheses regarding the association between environmental factors, lifestyle and the risk of disease development. This study examines how the socioeconomic condition of the patient with RA in Brazil, assessed according to social class, educational level, employment situation and use of caregivers, affects the times between the beginning of symptoms and diagnosis and the beginning of the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, as well as the presence of erosive disease and functional status. Methods: This work is part of a multicentric study called REAL - Rheumatoid Arthritis in Real Life in Brazil, which is a prospective observational cohort study. Results: As described in the REAL study, we included a total of 1115 patients. It was noted that patients with an educational classification of up to second grade incomplete presented with erosion percentages above those with a higher grade complete. Patients with caregivers presented a higher percentage of erosion than patients without caregivers. We verified that patients from economic classes above B2 presented fewer occurrences of erosion than those from classes C2, D-E. We also analyzed the average time differences from the beginning of symptoms and diagnosis and the beginning of treatment, according to academic level, erosion and economic classification. Patients with first grade complete showed an HAQ-DI averages higher than those with second grade complete. The patients who had employment showed lower HAQ-DI averages than patients who were not employed. The patients with erosion showed an HAQ-DI value higher than those without erosion. Patients with caregivers showed an HAQ-DI average higher than that of without caregivers. Conclusion: This study showed that the therapeutic window of RA is not being reached, and therefore we should have a policy to expand and ensure access to public health for all patients, especially those with lower levels of education and income. Trial registration: This study was approved by the National Commission of Ethics in Research.(AU)