Limitations of standard cost-effectiveness methods for health technology assessment of treatments for rare, chronic diseases: a case study of treatment for cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is useful to assess the value of health care interventions based on clinical effectiveness and costs. However, standard CEA methods make important assumptions that may significantly increase the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for lifelong treatments for rare, chronic diseases. We used the cost-effectiveness of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor and ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) for the treatment of cystic fibrosis as a case study to explore how alternative assumptions for (1) discounting, (2) utility measures, (3) disease management costs, and (4) static drug pricing impact cost-effectiveness outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cost-effectiveness of ELX/TEZ/IVA was evaluated using base-case inputs and assumptions reflecting standard CEA methods and was then compared with cost-effectiveness estimates obtained with alternate assumptions: (1) applying a lower discount rate to health benefits (1.5%) than costs (3%); (2) including a treatment-specific utility increment; (3) excluding disease management costs incurred during the period of extended survival attributable to ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment; and (4) decreasing the price of ELX/TEZ/IVA following loss of exclusivity. RESULTS: Modifying assumptions for these four factors together reduced the ICER by 75% from the base case, with the largest reduction (45%) occurring when the price trajectory was modified to allow for generic entry. Differential discounting, use of a treatment-specific utility increment, and exclusion of additional disease management costs each individually reduced the ICER by 36%, 14%, and 10%, respectively, from the base case. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the impact that modifications to standard CEA methods may have on measures of cost-effectiveness for rare, chronic diseases.

Disease burden in people with cystic fibrosis heterozygous for F508del and a minimal function mutation.

BACKGROUND: People with cystic fibrosis (CF) heterozygous for F508del-CFTR and a minimal function CFTR mutation (F/MF) that results in no CFTR protein or results in CFTR protein that is not responsive to tezacaftor, ivacaftor, and tezacaftor/ivacaftor in vitro comprise a sizeable percentage of the US CF population. This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study aimed to characterize CF burden in this subpopulation. METHODS: People ≥2 years of age in the US CF Foundation Patient Registry with a CF diagnosis, F/MF genotype, and ≥1 encounters in 2017 were included. Descriptive analyses assessed lung function, nutritional parameters, microbiology, hospitalization and pulmonary exacerbation rates, and CF-related complications. Results were stratified by age group; select characteristics were summarized by percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) and ethnicity. RESULTS: 5348 people met inclusion criteria. Rates of positive bacterial cultures, pulmonary exacerbations, and hospitalizations were generally higher in older age groups. Prevalence of prescribed symptomatic CF therapies was substantial and also generally higher in older age groups. ppFEV1 was lower in older age groups. A greater percentage of adolescents and adults reported complications, including cirrhosis, osteoporosis, osteopenia, and sinus disease, than younger age groups. Increased prevalence of cultured Pseudomonas aeruginosa and prescribed chronic therapy was seen with decreasing ppFEV1. In each age group, ppFEV1 was slightly higher in the non-Hispanic cohort than in the Hispanic cohort. CONCLUSIONS: People with F/MF genotypes have substantial disease burden that worsened in older age groups consistent with the progressive nature of CF, indicating need for additional treatment options in this subpopulation.