[Acceptance and status of digitalization in clinics and practices : Current assessment in German urology]. / Akzeptanz und Stand der Digitalisierung in Klinik und Praxis : Aktuelles Stimmungsbild in der deutschen Urologie.

BACKGROUND: Digitalization of patient documentation and introduction of the electronic patient record (ePA) pose challenges to everyday clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the acceptance and status of the digitalization of patient data and the introduction of the ePA among German urologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire with 30 questions about the acceptance and status of digitalization of patient documentation and ePA was sent out via the newsletter of the German Society of Urology. RESULTS: A total of 80 urologists participated in the survey (response rate 2%). Digital platforms such as Urotube or Researchgate are used by 63% of participants. The complete implementation of digital patient documentation was reported by 72% of respondents working in medical practice and by 54% of those working in the hospital (p = 0.042). While 76% see the digitalization process as reasonable, 34% expressed partial or strong concerns about the complete digitalization of patient documentation. Only 14% of the participants offer video consultations. Advantages for ePA include better networking of the healthcare system (73%), improved diagnosis, indication (41%) and treatment quality (48%), and avoidance of medication errors (70%). CONCLUSION: German urologists are open to the digitalization process and ePA. Especially younger urologists are using digital media. The advantages of digitalization are, in particular, an improvement in treatment processes. For a smooth introduction, a cross-departmental establishment and, if necessary, an adaptation of the treatment processes are necessary.

Treatment of Metastasized Prostate Cancer Beyond Progression After Upfront Docetaxel-A Real-world Data Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Besides second-generation hormone therapy (sHT), upfront docetaxel along with androgen deprivation therapy is the current standard of care for metastasized hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Evidence on second-line therapy upon progression on chemohormonal treatment outside clinical trials is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To comparatively assess the efficacy of subsequent therapy after upfront docetaxel in mHSPC in a real-world setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective multicenter analysis. Males with mHSPC on androgen-deprivation therapy progressed to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) after upfront docetaxel. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), and time to progression 2 (TTP2) were assessed. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for univariate comparison between the sHT and non-sHT (other therapies) cohorts. Median time to event was tested by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis regression was performed with the Cox proportional-hazard model. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Sixty-five patients were included in the final analysis. Median TTP2 was 20 mo, median PFS2 was 29 mo, and median OS was not reached; sHT was an independent predictor of favorable PFS2 as compared with non-sHT. Time to CRPC was also confirmed to be the strongest predictor for novel endpoints PFS2 and TTP2. Time to CRPC >18 mo conferred advantage to sHT over non-sHT in relation to PFS2 and OS. Second-line therapies were well tolerated. The analysis is prone to inherent flaws and biases due to its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: In real-world patients progressing after upfront docetaxel, sHT is independently associated with favorable PFS2 favoring drug class switch. Longer time to CRPC predicts strongly for superior PFS2 and TTP2. Further prospective research is warranted in order to guide treatment sequencing and improve outcomes and quality of life of males with metastasized prostate cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY: We analyzed the efficacy of second-line therapy after docetaxel in hormone-dependent metastatic prostate cancer. Novel hormone therapy appears to be a preferable option for deferring progression optimally. Larger patient databases are eagerly awaited.

Global change of surgical and oncological clinical practice in urology during early COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic captures healthcare resources worldwide, data on the impact of prioritization strategies in urology during pandemic are absent. We aimed to quantitatively assess the global change in surgical and oncological clinical practice in the early COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, we designed a 12-item online survey on the global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical practice in urology. Demographic survey data, change of clinical practice, current performance of procedures, and current commencement of treatment for 5 conditions in medical urological oncology were evaluated. RESULTS: 235 urologists from 44 countries responded. Out of them, 93% indicated a change of clinical practice due to COVID-19. In a 4-tiered surgery down-escalation scheme, 44% reported to make first cancellations, 23% secondary cancellations, 20% last cancellations and 13% emergency cases only. Oncological surgeries had low cancellation rates (%): transurethral resection of bladder tumor (27%), radical cystectomy (21-24%), nephroureterectomy (21%), radical nephrectomy (18%), and radical orchiectomy (8%). (Neo)adjuvant/palliative treatment is currently not started by more than half of the urologists. COVID-19 high-risk-countries had higher total cancellation rates for non-oncological procedures (78% vs. 68%, p = 0.01) and were performing oncological treatment for metastatic diseases at a lower rate (35% vs. 48%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected clinical practice of 93% of urologists worldwide. The impact of implementing surgical prioritization protocols with moderate cancellation rates for oncological surgeries and delay or reduction in (neo)adjuvant/palliative treatment will have to be evaluated after the pandemic.

To defer or not to defer? A German longitudinal multicentric assessment of clinical practice in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: After the outbreak of COVID-19 unprecedented changes in the healthcare systems worldwide were necessary resulting in a reduction of urological capacities with postponements of consultations and surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An email was sent to 66 urological hospitals with focus on robotic surgery (RS) including a link to a questionnaire (e.g. bed/staff capacity, surgical caseload, protection measures during RS) that covered three time points: a representative baseline week prior to COVID-19, the week of March 16th-22nd and April 20th-26th 2020. The results were evaluated using descriptive analyses. RESULTS: 27 out of 66 questionnaires were analyzed (response rate: 41%). We found a decrease of 11% in hospital beds and 25% in OR capacity with equal reductions for endourological, open and robotic procedures. Primary surgical treatment of urolithiasis and benign prostate syndrome (BPS) but also of testicular and penile cancer dropped by at least 50% while the decrease of surgeries for prostate, renal and urothelial cancer (TUR-B and cystectomies) ranged from 15 to 37%. The use of personal protection equipment (PPE), screening of staff and patients and protection during RS was unevenly distributed in the different centers-however, the number of COVID-19 patients and urologists did not reach double digits. CONCLUSION: The German urological landscape has changed since the outbreak of COVID-19 with a significant shift of high priority surgeries but also continuation of elective surgical treatments. While screening and staff protection is employed heterogeneously, the number of infected German urologists stays low.

Comparative assessment of docetaxel for safety and efficacy between hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare toxicity and response of docetaxel chemotherapy between metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) and castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients of the same therapeutic era for assessing of upfront docetaxel against the benchmark of docetaxel in the castrate resistant stage in the setting outside of clinical trials. METHODS: A prospectively collected database of real-world prostate cancer patients receiving docetaxel was divided in mHSPC and mCRPC cases and retrospectively analyzed. Principal objectives were toxicity measured by the common criteria of adverse events terminology and response characterized by Prostate specific antigen decline and radiographic progression-free disease at restaging. The prognostic value of suspected variables for grade 3 to 5 toxicity and response was investigated by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 72 patients 34 (47%) were treated for mHSPC and 38 (53%) for mCRPC. Patients with mCRPC were older and had worse performance status (P< 0.01). In mHSPC total number of grade 3 to 5 adverse events (24, median 0, interquartile range 0-1) was significantly less than in mCRPC (46, median 1, interquartile range 1-2) (P = 0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed age as independent predictive variable for grade 3 to 5 toxicity (P = 0.03) but not disease stage, Prostate specific antigen predocetaxel, volume of disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P > 0.05). Objective response was significantly higher in mHSPC compared to mCRPC patients (P < 0.01). Multivariable analysis confirmed mHSPC stage as independent prognostic factor for radiographic progression free disease at restaging (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The association of age with toxicity and of mHSPC stage with response resulted in significantly fewer grade 3 to 5 adverse events but higher response rates for upfront docetaxel in mHSPC compared with docetaxel in the later mCRPC stage.

Incidence, Risk Factors and Management of Symptomatic Lymphoceles after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the incidence, clinical course and risk factors for symptomatic lymphoceles after radical retropubic prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. Moreover, we explored parameters for the failure of percutaneous lymphocele drainage. METHODS: The incidence of symptomatic lymphoceles in patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection in our department between 2008 and 2013 was investigated retrospectively. The occurrence of lymphoceles was correlated with several clinical and histopathological parameters. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the value of independent variables with regard to the development of symptomatic lymphoceles and failure of percutaneous drainage. RESULTS: A total of 599 consecutive patients treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection were included in the study, of whom symptomatic lymphocele had developed in 5%. Median time to diagnosis of symptomatic lymphocele was 22.5 days. Median time of percutaneous drainage was 16 days. Overall 43% of patients required surgical unroofing. On multivariate analysis age greater than 67 years (OR 3.27, p=0.005) and removal of more than 10 lymph nodes (OR 2.57, p=0.018) were independent predictors for the development of symptomatic lymphoceles. A significantly increased risk of percutaneous drainage failure was observed in patients who had a body mass index greater than 27 kg/m2 (OR 7.0, p=0.03), followed by a trend for those with a drainage volume of more than 375 ml 24 hours after puncture (OR 3.89, p=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic lymphocele will develop in 1 of 20 patients after radical retropubic prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. The number of lymph nodes removed constitutes an independent risk factor. Percutaneous drainage failure is associated with high body mass index and high drainage volume within the first 24 hours after puncture.

Feasibility and Efficacy of a Urologic Profession Campaign on Cryptorchidism Using Internet and Social Media.

INTRODUCTION: We performed a professional campaign in Germany intending to establish the urologic profession as a competent and helpful point of contact for patients with cryptorchidism. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of this campaign and to quantify the efficacy of using Internet vs. social media. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The strategic design of the campaign comprised a strategy meeting, creation of a landing page, and targeted advertisements on Google in the form of Adwords and on Facebook in the form of sidebar ads and sponsored posts. Outcome measurements were number of impressions, homepage sessions, and downloads of an information brochure. RESULTS: The campaign generated 2,511,923 impressions, 7,369 homepage sessions and 1,086 downloads of information brochures using a total investment budget of 7,500€. Use of Google Adwords was more efficient on outcome measurements than Facebook. A subanalysis of Facebook advertisements showed that sidebar ads and sponsored posts were equally efficient. CONCLUSIONS: New media are an effective platform for a profession campaign. Google Adwords is a more effective and cost-efficient platform than Facebook for a targeted campaign.

Online Discussion on #KidneyStones: A Longitudinal Assessment of Activity, Users and Content.

INTRODUCTION: Twitter is a popular microblogging platform for the rapid dissemination of information and reciprocal exchange in the urological field. We aimed to assess the activity, users and content of the online discussion, #KidneyStones, on Twitter. METHODS: We investigated the Symplur Signals analytics tool for Twitter data distributed via the #KidneyStones hashtag over a one year period. Activity analysis reflected overall activity and tweet enhancements. We assessed users' geolocations and performed an influencer analysis. Content analysis included the most frequently used words, tweet sentiment and shares for top tweets. RESULTS: 3,426 users generated over 10,333 tweets, which were frequently accompanied by links (49%), mentions (30%) and photos (13%). Users came from 106 countries across the globe and were most frequently from North America (63%) and Europe (16%). Individual and organisational healthcare professionals made up 56% of the influencers of the Twitter discussion on #KidneyStones. Besides the words 'kidney' (used 4,045 times) and 'stones' (3,335), 'pain' (1,233), 'urine' (1,158), and 'risk' (1,023) were the most frequently used words. 56% of tweets had a positive sentiment. The median (range) number of shares was 85 (62-587) for the top 10 links, 45.5 (17-94) for the top 10 photos, and 44 (22-95) for the top 10 retweets. CONCLUSION: The rapidly growing Twitter discussion on #KidneyStones engaged multiple stakeholders in the healthcare sector on a global scale and reached both professionals and laypeople. When used effectively and responsibly, the Twitter platform could improve prevention and medical care of kidney stone patients.

Robotic Prostatectomy on the Web: A Cross-Sectional Qualitative Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Many patients diagnosed with prostate cancer search for information on robotic prostatectomy (RobP) on the Web. We aimed to evaluate the qualitative characteristics of the mostly frequented Web sites on RobP with a particular emphasis on provider-dependent issues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Google was searched for the term "robotic prostatectomy" in Europe and North America. The mostly frequented Web sites were selected and classified as physician-provided and publically-provided. Quality was measured using Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, DISCERN score, and addressing of Trifecta surgical outcomes. Popularity was analyzed using Google PageRank and Alexa tool. Accessibility, usability, and reliability were investigated using the LIDA tool and readability was assessed using readability indices. RESULTS: Twenty-eight Web sites were physician-provided and 15 publically-provided. For all Web sites, 88% of JAMA benchmark criteria were fulfilled, DISCERN quality score was high, and 81% of Trifecta outcome measurements were addressed. Popularity was average according to Google PageRank (mean 2.9 ± 1.5) and Alexa Traffic Rank (median, 49,109; minimum, 7; maximum, 8,582,295). Accessibility (85 ± 7%), usability (92 ± 3%), and reliability scores (88 ± 8%) were moderate to high. Automated Readability Index was 7.2 ± 2.1 and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 9 ± 2, rating the Web sites as difficult to read. Physician-provided Web sites had higher quality scores and lower readability compared with publically-provided Web sites. CONCLUSION: Websites providing information on RobP obtained medium to high ratings in all domains of quality in the current assessment. In contrast, readability needs to be significantly improved so that this content can become available for the populace.