Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 104(6): 2017-2023, 2021 04 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33819171

RESUMO

Cholera is a severe acute, highly transmissible diarrheal disease which affects many low- and middle-income countries. Outbreaks of cholera are confirmed using microbiological culture, and additional cases during the outbreak are generally identified based on clinical case definitions, rather than laboratory confirmation. Many low-resource areas where cholera occurs lack the capacity to perform culture in an expeditious manner. A simple, reliable, and low-cost rapid diagnostic test (RDT) would improve identification of cases allowing rapid response to outbreaks. Several commercial RDTs are available for cholera testing with two lines to detect either serotypes O1 and O139; however, issues with sensitivity and specificity have not been optimal with these bivalent tests. Here, we report an evaluation of a new commercially available cholera dipstick test which detects only serotype O1. In both laboratory and field studies in Kenya, we demonstrate high sensitivity (97.5%), specificity (100%), and positive predictive value (100%) of this new RDT targeting only serogroup O1. This is the first field evaluation for the new Crystal VC-O1 RDT; however, with these high-performance metrics, this RDT could significantly improve cholera outbreak detection and improve surveillance for better understanding of cholera disease burden.


Assuntos
Cólera/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/economia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/instrumentação , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Quênia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sorogrupo , Vibrio cholerae O1/classificação , Vibrio cholerae O1/isolamento & purificação , Adulto Jovem
2.
BMC Public Health ; 18(1): 723, 2018 06 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29890963

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: From December 2014 to September 2016, a cholera outbreak in Kenya, the largest since 2010, caused 16,840 reported cases and 256 deaths. The outbreak affected 30 of Kenya's 47 counties and occurred shortly after the decentralization of many healthcare services to the county level. This mixed-methods study, conducted June-July 2015, assessed cholera preparedness in Homa Bay, Nairobi, and Mombasa counties and explored clinic- and community-based health care workers' (HCW) experiences during outbreak response. METHODS: Counties were selected based on cumulative cholera burden and geographic characteristics. We conducted 44 health facility cholera preparedness checklists (according to national guidelines) and 8 focus group discussions (FGDs). Frequencies from preparedness checklists were generated. To determine key themes from FGDs, inductive and deductive codes were applied; MAX software for qualitative data analysis (MAXQDA) was used to identify patterns. RESULTS: Some facilities lacked key materials for treating cholera patients, diagnosing cases, and maintaining infection control. Overall, 82% (36/44) of health facilities had oral rehydration salts, 65% (28/43) had IV fluids, 27% (12/44) had rectal swabs, 11% (5/44) had Cary-Blair transport media, and 86% (38/44) had gloves. A considerable number of facilities lacked disease reporting forms (34%, 14/41) and cholera treatment guidelines (37%, 16/43). In FDGs, HCWs described confusion regarding roles and reporting during the outbreak, which highlighted issues in coordination and management structures within the health system. Similar to checklist findings, FGD participants described supply challenges affecting laboratory preparedness and infection prevention and control. Perceived successes included community engagement, health education, strong collaboration between clinic and community HCWs, and HCWs' personal passion to help others. CONCLUSIONS: The confusion over roles, reporting, and management found in this evaluation highlights a need to adapt, implement, and communicate health strategies at the county level, in order to inform and train HCWs during health system transformations. International, national, and county stakeholders could strengthen preparedness and response for cholera and other public health emergencies in Kenya, and thereby strengthen global health security, through further investment in the existing Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response structure and national cholera prevention and control plan, and the adoption of county-specific cholera control plans.


Assuntos
Cólera/epidemiologia , Cólera/prevenção & controle , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/psicologia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Equipamentos e Provisões/provisão & distribuição , Administração de Instituições de Saúde , Lista de Checagem , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/organização & administração , Grupos Focais , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Quênia/epidemiologia , Laboratórios/organização & administração , Política , Pesquisa Qualitativa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA