Allyship to Advance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Otolaryngology: What We Can All Do.

Purpose of review: To summarize the current literature on allyship, providing a historical perspective, concept analysis, and practical steps to advance equity, diversity, and inclusion. This review also provides evidence-based tools to foster allyship and identifies potential pitfalls. Recent findings: Allies in healthcare advocate for inclusive and equitable practices that benefit patients, coworkers, and learners. Allyship requires working in solidarity with individuals from underrepresented or historically marginalized groups to promote a sense of belonging and opportunity. New technologies present possibilities and perils in paving the pathway to diversity. Summary: Unlocking the power of allyship requires that allies confront unconscious biases, engage in self-reflection, and act as effective partners. Using an allyship toolbox, allies can foster psychological safety in personal and professional spaces while avoiding missteps. Allyship incorporates goals, metrics, and transparent data reporting to promote accountability and to sustain improvements. Implementing these allyship strategies in solidarity holds promise for increasing diversity and inclusion in the specialty.

Otolaryngologist Characteristics and Outlier Use of Balloon Sinuplasty in the Medicare Population.

OBJECTIVE: Balloon sinuplasty (BSP) is associated with varied practice patterns. This study sought to identify otolaryngologist characteristics associated with BSP utilization. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Medicare claims data and the National Physician Compare database. METHODS: Outlier otolaryngologists were compared to non-outliers. Otolaryngologist characteristics included sex, practice size, geographic setting, years of experience, procedure setting, 10 or fewer endoscopic sinus surgeries per year for 3 or more years, and high number of services per unique Medicare beneficiary. Outlier status was defined as performing an annual total of balloon procedures of 2 standard deviations (SDs) above the mean for all otolaryngologists in the same year. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and December 2017, 1,408 otolaryngologists performed 101,662 endoscopic sinus surgeries and 97,680 BSP procedures. Sixty-six outlier otolaryngologists (4.7%) accounted for 44.3% of all BSP procedures. Outlier status was associated with practice size of 10 or fewer individual providers (OR, 5.15; 95% CI, 2.73-9.74; P < .001), performance of 10 or fewer total endoscopic sinus surgeries per year for 3 or more years (OR, 3.90; 95% CI, 1.59-9.57; P = .003), and high number of overall services per beneficiary (OR 6.70; 95% CI, 1.19-37.84; P = .031). Provider sex, years of experience, and geographic setting were not associated with outlier status. CONCLUSION: Outlier BSP patterns are associated with a few otolaryngologists who are more likely to be identified in small practices and record low numbers of endoscopic surgeries. Although BSP is an appropriate and effective tool, identification of outlier patterns may help to facilitate peer-to-peer counsel. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1340-1345, 2022.

Medicare Beneficiaries With Self-Reported Functional Hearing Difficulty Have Unmet Health Care Needs.

Hearing loss is associated with higher health care spending and use, but little is known about the unmet health care needs of people with hearing loss or difficulty. Analysis of 2016 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data for beneficiaries ages sixty-five and older reveals that those who reported a lot of trouble hearing in the past year were 49 percent more likely than those who reported no trouble hearing to indicate not having a usual source of care. Compared with those who reported no trouble hearing, those who reported some trouble hearing were more likely to indicate not having obtained medical care in the past year when they thought it was needed, as well as not filling a prescription, with the risk for both behaviors being greater among those reporting a lot of trouble hearing versus a little. Interventions that improve access to hearing services and aid communication may help older Medicare beneficiaries meet their health care needs.

Assessment of Parental Choice Predisposition for Tonsillectomy in Children.

Importance: The decision to proceed with tonsillectomy to treat pediatric obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (OSDB) often falls on individual families. Despite emphasis on shared decision-making between parents and surgeons about tonsillectomy for OSDB, the extent to which parents have already decided about surgery prior to the child's consultation is not known. Objective: To identify predictors of parent choice predisposition for surgical treatment of OSDB with tonsillectomy and describe its association with parent-clinician communication. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational cohort study conducted at 3 outpatient clinical sites (urban-based outpatient center, suburban off-site outpatient center, and community-based medical center) associated with a large academic center. A total of 149 parents of children undergoing their initial otolaryngology consultation for OSDB were identified through clinic scheduling records and deemed eligible for participation in this study. Of the 149 parents, a volunteer sample of 64 parents (42.9%) agreed to participate and have their consultation audiorecorded. Of these 64 participants, 12 parents were excluded because their child had previously been evaluated for OSDB by a specialist. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes and measures were treatment choice predisposition scale (a measure of the strength of a patient's treatment decision prior to entering a medical consultation), parent communication behaviors coded in consultation audiorecordings (substantive questions asked, introduced medical jargon, expression of treatment preference, and scores on the OSDB and Adenotonsillectomy Knowledge Scale for parents). Results: A total of 52 parent participants were included in the final analysis. Most parent participants were female (n = 48; 92%); 50% (n = 26) of parents were non-Hispanic White, 37% (n = 19) were Black, 10% (n = 5) were Hispanic/Latino, and 4% (n = 2) self-reported race/ethnicity as "Other." Mean (range) choice predisposition was 6.84 (2-10), with 22 parents (42%) more predisposed to choose tonsillectomy. Parents more predisposed to choose tonsillectomy used more medical jargon during the consultation (odds ratio [OR], 3.95; 95% CI, 1.16-15.15) and were less likely to ask questions (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05-0.87). Parental predictors of greater predisposition toward choosing surgery were White race (OR, 7.31; 95% CI, 1.77-39.33) and prior evaluation by a pediatrician for OSDB (OR, 6.10; 95% CI, 1.44-33.34). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of parents of children with OSDB, many parents were predisposed to choose treatment with tonsillectomy prior to initial surgical consultation, which may lessen engagement and influence 2-way communication. In this cohort, greater predisposition for tonsillectomy was observed in non-Hispanic White parents and parents of patients who had been previously evaluated by a pediatrician for OSDB. Understanding parent choice predisposition for surgery may promote improved communication and parental engagement during surgical consultations. It may also help direct education about sleep and tonsillectomy to nonsurgical forums.

Satisfaction With Quality of Health Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Functional Hearing Loss.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Nearly 38 million Americans have hearing loss. Understanding how sensory deficits such as hearing loss, which limit communication, impact satisfaction has implications for Medicare value-based reimbursement mechanisms. The aim of this study was to characterize the association of functional hearing loss and dissatisfaction with quality of health care over the past year among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of satisfaction with quality of health care among Medicare beneficiaries with self-reported trouble hearing from the 2015 Medicare Current Beneficiaries Survey. There were 11,441 Medicare beneficiaries representing a 48.6 million total weighted nationally representative sample. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of Medicare beneficiaries reported a little or a lot of trouble hearing. Medicare beneficiaries with a little trouble hearing (odds ratio=1.496; 95% confidence interval, 1.079-2.073; P=0.016) and a lot of trouble hearing (odds ratio=1.769; 95% confidence interval, 1.175-2.664; P=0.007) had 49.6% and 76.9% higher odds of being dissatisfied with the quality of their health care over the previous year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries with functional hearing loss had higher odds of dissatisfaction with health care over the past year compared to those without functional hearing loss. Given Medicare's reliance on patient satisfaction as a value-based measure for hospital reimbursement, interventions to address hearing loss in the health care system are needed.

Differences in Tonsillectomy Utilization by Race/Ethnicity, Type of Health Insurance, and Rurality.

OBJECTIVE: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures. In previous decades, large geographic variation and racial disparities in its use have been reported. We aimed to compare contemporary rates of pediatric tonsillectomy utilization in the United States by child race/ethnicity, type of health insurance, and metropolitan/nonmetropolitan residence. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases and State Inpatient Databases of 8 US states. We included all children aged <15 years who underwent tonsillectomy in 2013 to 2017. Annual population-level tonsillectomy rates across states and sociodemographic groups overall and by surgical indication were calculated using US Census data. Negative binomial regression models were used to compare rates between groups. RESULTS: In all states evaluated, tonsillectomy utilization was higher in non-Hispanic white children than non-Hispanic black or Hispanic children, higher in publicly insured than privately insured children, and higher in children residing in nonmetropolitan areas as compared to metropolitan areas (all P < .05). Tonsillectomy use was highest among white children from nonmetropolitan areas, both overall and for each indication (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Tonsillectomy utilization is higher in US children who are white, publicly insured, and who live in nonmetropolitan areas. Future research should identify multilevel factors, such as those at the patient, family, primary care provider, otolaryngologist, health care delivery system, interpersonal and community levels, that explain these differences in utilization in order to improve the appropriateness and equity of tonsillectomy use in children.

Differences in Tonsillectomy Use by Race/Ethnicity and Type of Health Insurance Before and After the 2011 Tonsillectomy Clinical Practice Guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether differences in pediatric tonsillectomy use by race/ethnicity and type of insurance were impacted by the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery's 2011 tonsillectomy clinical practice guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: We included children aged <15 years from Florida or South Carolina who underwent tonsillectomy in 2004-2017. Annual tonsillectomy rates within groups defined by race/ethnicity and type of health insurance were calculated using US Census data, and interrupted time series analyses were used to compare the guidelines' impact on utilization across groups. RESULTS: The average annual tonsillectomy rate was greater among non-Hispanic white children (66 procedures per 10 000 children) than non-Hispanic black (38 procedures per 10 000 children) or Hispanic children (41 procedures per 10 000 children) (P < .001). From the year before to the year after the guidelines' release, tonsillectomy use decreased among non-Hispanic white children (-11.1 procedures per 10 000 children), but not among non-Hispanic black (-0.9 procedures per 10 000 children) or Hispanic children (+3.9 procedures per 10 000 children) (P < .05). Use was greater among publicly than privately insured children (75 vs 52 procedures per 10 000 children, P < .001). The guidelines were associated with a reversal of the upward trend in use seen in 2004-2010 among publicly insured children (-5.5 procedures per 10 000 children per year, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Tonsillectomy use is greatest among white and publicly insured children. However, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery's 2011 clinical practice guideline statement was associated with an immediate decrease and change in use trends in these groups, narrowing differences in utilization by race/ethnicity and type of insurance.

Identification of Potential Barriers to Timely Access to Pediatric Hearing Aids.

Importance: Despite various barriers identified to early pediatric access to cochlear implantation, barriers to timely access to pediatric hearing aids are not well characterized. Objective: To identify socioeconomic, demographic, and clinical factors that may be associated with pediatric access to hearing aids. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 90 patients aged 1 to 15 years who were referred for auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing and evaluation for hearing aids at a single tertiary care academic medical center from March 2004 to July 2018. Children who did not receive both ABR testing and hearing aids at the same center were excluded from analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Associations of insurance type (private vs public), race/ethnicity (white vs other), primary language (English vs other), cause of hearing loss (complex vs not complex), zip code, hearing aid manufacturer, and severity of hearing loss (in decibels) with the duration of intervals from newborn hearing screening to ABR testing, from ABR testing to ordering of hearing aids, and from ABR testing to dispensing of hearing aids. Results: Of the 90 patients, mean (SD) age was 5.6 (3.7) years, 56% were female, and 77 (86%) were non-Hispanic. Results of χ2 tests indicated significant assocations existed between public insurance and race/ethnicity and between public insurance and primary language other than English. Variables associated with the interval from newborn hearing screening to ABR testing included insurance type (mean difference, 7.4 months; 95% CI, 2.6-12.2 months) and race/ethnicity (mean difference, 6.9 months; 95% CI, 2.7-11.1 months). Increased delays between birth and a child's first ABR test were associated with public insurance (mean difference, 6.0 months; 95% CI, 1.8-10.2 months) and race/ethnicity other than white (mean difference, 6.0 months; 95% CI, 2.3-9.7 months). The mean time from birth to initial ABR testing was a mean of 6 months longer for patients from non-English-speaking families than for those from English-speaking families (mean [SD] interval, 14.9 [16.3] months vs 9.0 [8.5] months), although the difference was not statistically significant. Severity of hearing loss was associated with a decrease in the interval from ABR testing to ordering of hearing aids after accounting for other potential barriers (odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9). Zip code and complexity of the child's medical condition did not appear to be associated with timely access to pediatric hearing aids. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that insurance type, race/ethnicity, and primary language may be barriers associated with pediatric access to hearing aids, with the greatest difference observed in time to initial ABR testing. Clinical severity of hearing loss appeared to be associated with a significant decrease in time from ABR testing to ordering of hearing aids. Greater efforts to assist parents with ABR testing and coordination of follow-up may help improve access for other at-risk children.

Patient Safety/Quality Improvement Primer, Part I: What PS/QI Means to Your Otolaryngology Practice.

Patient safety/quality improvement (PS/QI) is the cornerstone of 21st-century health care. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery is excited to provide a dedicated PS/QI primer. The overarching goal for this PS/QI series is to provide a comprehensive and practical resource that assists readers, authors, and peer reviewers in understanding PS/QI research, its unique methodology, and the associated reporting standards for trustworthy performance measures. The target audience includes resident and fellows, faculty from the private sector and academia, and allied health professionals. This inaugural primer reviews PS/QI background as it relates to otolaryngology practice. It explores the history, goals, and development of performance measurement. In addition, it highlights opportunities for integrating PS/QI into otolaryngology practice. Payers will drive patients to quality care based on outcomes. Otolaryngologists have a responsibility to embrace a culture of PS/QI. In doing so, we will define optimal, quality otolaryngology care through objective data and metrics.

Tympanostomy Tube Placement vs Medical Management for Recurrent Acute Otitis Media in TRICARE-Insured Children.

Objective To compare number of infections and health care utilization in children insured by TRICARE with recurrent acute otitis media (RAOM) managed surgically with tympanostomy tube (TT) placement compared with those managed medically. Study Design Retrospective matched cohort study. Setting TRICARE claims database from 2006 to 2010. Subjects and Methods We matched TRICARE beneficiaries ≤5 years of age diagnosed with RAOM who underwent TT placement with those managed medically using 1:1 coarsened-exact matching on age, sex, race, sponsor rank, and region. We used multivariable negative binomial regression to compare number of infections and health care utilization at 1 and 2 years. Outcomes were adjusted for rate of infection before treatment for RAOM, season of either TT placement or establishment of candidacy for TT placement, and comorbidities. Results Among 6659 pairs identified at 1-year follow-up, the TT group had fewer infections (1.96 vs 2.18, P < .001) and oral antibiotic prescriptions (1.52 vs 1.67, P < .001) but more visits to primary care physicians (4.36 vs 4.06, P < .0001) and otolaryngologists (1.21 vs 0.44, P < .0001) compared with the medically managed group. At 2-year follow-up, the benefits of TT placement were no longer seen. Conclusion TT placement for RAOM is associated with fewer infections and oral antibiotic prescriptions in the first year after surgery but more doctor visits. Benefits of TT placement do not appear to extend through the second year. Future research should investigate costs associated with TT placement vs medical management, as well as real-time health care utilization with impact on patient symptoms and quality of life.

Are There Racial Disparities in Family-Reported Experiences of Care in Inpatient Pediatrics?

Despite increased emphasis on patient satisfaction as a quality measure in health care, little is known about the influence of race in parent-reported experience of care in pediatrics. This study evaluates the association of race with patient satisfaction scores in an inpatient pediatric tertiary care hospital in one year. Risk-adjusted multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of minority race with the likelihood to provide a top-box (=5) satisfaction score for 38 individual questions across 8 domains. Of the 904 participants, 269 (29.8%) identified as belonging to a minority race. Parents of minority children reported 30% to 50% lower satisfaction across questions related to well-established themes of interpersonal communication and cultural competency. Overall, minorities also reported lower satisfaction for the domain of nursing care (odds ratio 0.7, P = .016). These findings suggest a need for training and interventions to improve communication and mitigate disparities in how minority patients and their families perceive pediatric care.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Receipt of Pressure Equalization Tubes Among US Children, 2014.

OBJECTIVE: Pressure equalization tube (PET) placement (also referred to as tympanostomy tube placement) is among the most common ambulatory surgical procedures performed on US children. More than 20 years ago, differences according to race/ethnicity in the national prevalence of having had PETs placed were documented. Whether these differences persist is unknown. METHODS: We used data from the 2014 National Health Interview Survey to examine the percentage of children 0 to 17 years of age who have ever undergone PET placement. Unadjusted logistic regression with predictive margins was used to assess the relationship between having received PETs and race/ethnicity, as well as other clinical, socioeconomic, and geographic factors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine whether other factors could account for any observed differences according to race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Overall, 8.9% of children 0 to 17 years of age had undergone PET surgery. By race/ethnicity, 12.6% of non-Hispanic white children received PETs, which was significantly greater than the 4.8% of non-Hispanic black, 4.4% of Hispanic, and 5.6% of non-Hispanic other/multiple race children who had this surgery (P < .001 for all comparisons). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted prevalence for non-Hispanic white children (10.8%) was greater than for non-Hispanic black (5.4%) and Hispanic (5.8%) children (P < .001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 9% of US children have had PETs placed. Non-Hispanic white children still have a greater prevalence of PET placement compared with non-Hispanic black and Hispanic children. These differences could not be fully explained by other demographic, clinical, socioeconomic, or geographic differences between racial/ethnic groups.

Do race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status affect why we place ear tubes in children?

INTRODUCTION: Despite recent concerns about potential overuse of tympanostomy tube (TT) placement to treat otitis media in children, utilization of this common procedure in the U.S. has been shown to be relatively less common among minority children. It is not known if the indications for TT differ by child race/ethnicity and/or socioeconomic status (SES). Our objective is to analyze the association of patient- and neighborhood-level demographics and SES with clinical indications for TT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of children who underwent TT at single urban academic tertiary pediatric care center in a 6-month period (8/2013-3/2014). Children with congenital anomalies or syndromic diagnoses were excluded (50/137 children, 36.5%). Children were grouped by primary TT indication, recurrent acute otitis media (RAOM) or chronic otitis media with effusion (OME). Group characteristics were compared using t-tests and chi-square analyses, and logistic regression was performed to assess the association between demographics and TT indication. RESULTS: 87 children were included in this analysis (mean age = 2.8 years, 1-6 years). The most common indication for TT was RAOM (53%), and these children had a mean of 6 AOM episodes/year. Indications for TT varied significantly by the patient's neighborhood SES (median neighborhood income $70,969.09-RAOM vs $58, 844.95-OME, p-value = 0.009). Those undergoing TT for RAOM were less likely to live in a high-poverty neighborhood (OR = 0.36,p-value = 0.02), whereas children who underwent TT for OME were more likely to live in a high-poverty neighborhood. There was no significant difference in indication by race/ethnicity or insurance type. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, TT indications differed by SES. Among children receiving tubes, those from high poverty areas were more likely than those from low poverty neighborhoods to receive tubes for the indication of OME as opposed to RAOM. This finding suggests that concerns for appropriate use of TT in the setting of RAOM may be specific to a more affluent population. Future prospective patient-centered research will evaluate cultural and economic influences for families pursuing TT placement, as well as factors considered by physicians who make surgical recommendations.

Inpatient Pediatric Tonsillectomy: Does Hospital Type Affect Cost and Outcomes of Care?

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether hospital type is associated with differences in total cost and outcomes for inpatient tonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of the 2006, 2009, and 2012 Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Children ≤18 years of age undergoing tonsillectomy with/without adenoidectomy were included. Risk-adjusted generalized linear models assessed for differences in hospital cost and length of stay (LOS) among children managed by (1) non-children's teaching hospitals (NCTHs), (2) children's teaching hospitals (CTHs), and (3) nonteaching hospitals (NTHs). Risk-adjusted logistic regression compared the odds of major perioperative complications (hemorrhage, respiratory failure, death). Models accounted for clustering of patients within hospitals, were weighted to provide national estimates, and controlled for comorbidities. RESULTS: The 25,685 tonsillectomies recorded in the KID yielded a national estimate of 40,591 inpatient tonsillectomies performed in 2006, 2009, and 2012. The CTHs had significantly higher risk-adjusted total cost and LOS per tonsillectomy compared with NCTHs and NTHs ($9423.34/2.8 days, $6250.78/2.11 days, and $5905.10/2.08 days, respectively; P < .001). The CTHs had higher odds of complications compared with NCTHs (odds ratio [OR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.15-1.91; P = .002) but not when compared with NTHs (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.89-1.59; P = .23). The CTHs were significantly more likely to care for patients with comorbidities (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Significant differences in costs, outcomes, and patient factors exist for inpatient tonsillectomy based on hospital type. Although reasons for these differences are not discernable using isolated claims data, findings provide a foundation to further evaluate patient, institutional, and system-level factors that may reduce cost of care and improve value for inpatient tonsillectomy.

Does Race/Ethnicity or Socioeconomic Status Influence Patient Satisfaction in Pediatric Surgical Care?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient satisfaction in outpatient pediatric surgical care and assess differences in scores by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES). STUDY DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Outpatient pediatric surgical specialty clinics at a tertiary academic center. SUBJECT AND METHODS: Families of patients received a patient satisfaction survey following their initial care visit in 2012. Mean scores were calculated and compared by child race/ethnicity and insurance type, where insurance with medical assistance (MA) served as a proxy for low SES. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare scores between groups. Surveys were dichotomized to low and high scorers, and multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the likelihood of high satisfaction. RESULTS: Of 527 surveys completed, 132 (25%) were for children with MA and 143 (27%) were for racial/ethnic minority children. The overall satisfaction score for all specialties was 84.8, which did not significantly differ by SES (P = .98) or minority status (P = .52). The survey item with the highest score in both SES groups was "degree to which provider talked with you using words you could understand" (overall mean 91.94, P = .23). Multivariate analysis showed that patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, neighborhood SES, neighborhood diversity, or surgical department did not significantly influence satisfaction. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the relationship between SES and race/ethnicity with patient satisfaction in outpatient pediatric surgical specialty care. In this analysis, no disparities were identified in the patient experience by individual- or community-level factors. Although the survey methodologies may be limited, these findings suggest that provision of care in pediatric surgical specialties can be simultaneously equitable, culturally competent, and family centered.

Patient experience in the pediatric otolaryngology clinic: does the teaching setting influence parent satisfaction?

OBJECTIVES: Patient experience scores are now recognized as a chief indicator of healthcare quality. This report compares outpatient pediatric otolaryngology patient satisfaction in the teaching and non-teaching settings. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, multi-site, patient-level analysis of satisfaction surveys (Press Ganey™ Medical Practice©) completed by parents of pediatric otolaryngology patients in FY2010. METHODS: Surveys were stratified by teaching/non-teaching affiliation. The survey has 29 Likert-scaled questions which comprise an overall score and subscores in 6 domains: access, visit, nursing, provider, personal issues, and assessment. The item likelihood-to-recommend was measured to indicate practice loyalty. Mean scores were compared by Kruskal-Wallis rank test. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of teaching status with receipt of highest scores (HI-SCORES). RESULTS: 4704 pediatric surveys were analyzed, with 1984 (42%) from the teaching setting. For the teaching setting, mean scores were lower overall (88.1 vs. 89.0; p<0.001) and in domains of access (includes scheduling ease, promptness in returning calls; 86.7 vs. 89.4; p<0.001) and personal issues (includes office hour convenience, sensitivity to needs; 87.0 vs. 88.5; p<0.001). Differences in access scores were largest for young children (0-<6 years; 86.0 vs. 89.5; p<0.001). Children in the teaching setting were less likely to have HI-SCORES overall (OR 0.78; 95%CI 0.65-0.95; p=0.011) and for access (OR 0.8; 95%CI 0.67-0.95; p=0.012); probability of HI-SCORES was similar for the two settings for all other domains. CONCLUSIONS: Parents of pediatric otolaryngology patients evaluated in the teaching setting report lower satisfaction related to access, but similar scores for care providers and practice loyalty. Academic otolaryngology practices might focus on access issues to improve the overall care experience for children and families.

Outpatient tonsillectomy in children: demographic and geographic variation in the United States, 2006.

OBJECTIVES: To examine geographic and demographic variation for outpatient tonsillectomy in children nationally. STUDY DESIGN: The 2006 National Survey of Ambulatory Surgery was analyzed to describe outpatient tonsillectomy in children. Rates by age, sex, region, urban/rural residence, and payment source were calculated with 2006 population estimates from the Census Bureau and the National Health Interview Survey as denominators. Rates were compared with Z tests. RESULTS: In 2006, approximately 583 000 (95% CI, 370 000-796 000) outpatient tonsillectomy procedures were performed in children in the United States. Rates per 10 000 children were lower in children 13 to 17 years old (33.8 per 10 000) than in both children 7 to 12 years old (91.3; P < .05) and children 0 to 6 years old (102.9; P < .001). Compared with the South, tonsillectomy rates were lower in the West (29 per 10 000 versus 125 per 10 000; P < .01) and not significantly different in other regions. Compared with large central metropolitan areas, tonsillectomy rates were higher in small/medium metropolitan areas (118 per 10 000 versus 42 per 10 000; P < .05), and not significantly different in large fringe or non-metropolitan areas. Tonsillectomy rates were similar for children insured by Medicaid compared with those insured by private sources. Compared with older children (13-17 years), children in the younger age groups (0-6 years, 7-12 years) underwent tonsillectomy more commonly for airway obstruction (69.5% and 59.2% versus 34.3%, P < .05 for both). Compared with older children, younger children (0-6 years) underwent tonsillectomy less commonly for infection (40.4% versus 61.0% [7-12 years] and 72.2% [13-17 years], P < .001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Use of tonsillectomy in the ambulatory setting varies across age groups, geographic regions, levels of urbanization, and indication. Further research is warranted to examine these differences.

Cystic fibrosis and sinusitis in children: outcomes and socioeconomic status.

OBJECTIVES: Although chronic sinusitis is prevalent in children with cystic fibrosis (CF), little is known regarding pulmonary outcomes following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Furthermore, lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with increased morbidity in children with CF. The investigators evaluated the impact of surgery and SES on pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in children with CF and rhinosinusitis. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban tertiary CF center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Children with CF ages 0 to 21 evaluated for sinusitis between 1998 and 2008 were analyzed. Children were grouped according to surgery status (ESS or no ESS). Medicaid (MA) insurance was used as a proxy for lower SES. PFTs (percent predicted forced vital capacity [FVC%predicted] and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1%predicted]) were recorded over years. Multivariate linear regression models and interaction terms (ESS and MA) were used to analyze PFTs. RESULTS: Of 62 patients evaluated, 21 (34%) underwent ESS, and 16 (26%) had MA. Polyps were more common in the ESS group (86% vs 32%, P < .001). FEV1%predicted and FVC%predicted were lower at all times for children with MA (P < .001). After adjustment for MA, mean FEV1%predicted was higher for the ESS group at all time points (P < .02), and mean FVC%predicted was higher at 1 and 2 years (P = .02, P = .01). Compared with the nonsurgical group, children without MA undergoing ESS had higher mean FEV1%predicted at all 3 follow-up visits (P ≤ .05).Children with MA who underwent ESS had higher mean FVC%predicted at 1 year (P = .04) and higher mean FEV1%predicted preoperatively and at 1 year (P ≤ .01). CONCLUSIONS: Children with CF and sinusitis who undergo ESS experience some increase in PFTs over time, although this change is not uniform. Children with CF and sinusitis who are from lower socioeconomic backgrounds have lower PFTs over time regardless of surgical intervention.

Socioeconomic disparities for hearing-impaired children in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate disparities in socioeconomic status and healthcare utilization in hearing-impaired children using a nationally representative sample. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of stacked data from the 1997 to 2003 National Health Interview Survey, a voluntary U.S. household survey of the National Center for Health Statistics. METHODS: Children were grouped according to three levels of hearing ability based on parental response to perceived hearing status. χ(2) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) models tested the association of individual sociodemographic variables with hearing status. Multivariate regression analyses examined the association of hearing impairment with family income, poverty status, and utilization of routine and specialty health services. RESULTS: The total sample consisted of 76,012 children, of whom 2.6% had some hearing loss and 0.43% had marked hearing loss. Families of hearing-impaired children were more likely to report poorer health status, have Medicaid, live in single-mother households, and live below the poverty level (P < .01). After adjusting for confounders, children with mild and marked hearing impairment were less likely to afford prescription medications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-2.48 [mild]; OR = 2.72, 95% CI, 1.73-4.29 [marked]) and less likely to have access to mental health services (OR = 3.26, 95% CI, 2.41-4.69 [mild]; OR = 2.62, 95% CI, 1.34-5.12 [marked]) or dental services (OR = 1.65, 95% CI, 1.36-2.02 [mild]; OR = 1.62, 95% CI, 1.09-2.41 [marked]). No difference was identified for access to routine/sick health services. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with families of children without hearing loss, families of hearing-impaired children live closer to the poverty level and utilize some medical services with less frequency. Further identification of causal relationships between familial socioeconomic status and childhood hearing loss may help direct policy initiatives designed to mitigate healthcare disparities and improve access to services for hearing-impaired children.