Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(4): 826-834, 2023 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36306481

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The intended clinical value of frailty screening is to identify unfit patients needing geriatric assessment (GA) and to prevent unnecessary GA in fit patients. These hypotheses rely on the sensitivity and specificity of screening tests, but they have not been verified. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of outpatients age ≥ 70 years with prostate, breast, colorectal, or lung cancer included in the ELCAPA cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02884375) between February 2007 and December 2019. The diagnostic accuracy of the G8 Geriatric Screening Tool (G8) and modified G8 scores for identifying unfit patients was determined on the basis of GA results. We used decision curve analysis to calculate the benefit of frailty screening for detecting unfit patients and avoiding unnecessary GA in fit patients across different threshold probabilities. RESULTS: We included 1,648 patients (median age, 81 years), and 1,428 (87%) were unfit. The sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 85% (95% CI, 84 to 87) and 59% (95% CI, 57 to 61) for G8, and 86% (95% CI, 84 to 87) and 60% (95% CI, 58 to 63) for the modified G8 score. For decision curve analysis, the net benefit (NB) for identifying unfit patients were 0.72 for G8, 0.72 for the modified G8, and 0.82 for GA at a threshold probability of 0.25. At a threshold probability of 0.33, the NBs were 0.71, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. At a threshold probability of 0.5, the NBs were 0.68, 0.69, and 0.73, respectively. No screening tool reduced unnecessary GA in fit patients at predefined threshold probabilities. CONCLUSION: Although frailty screening tests showed good diagnostic accuracy, screening showed no clinical benefits over the GA-for-all strategy. NB approaches, in addition to diagnostic accuracy, are necessary to assess the clinical value of tests.


Assuntos
Fragilidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Masculino , Idoso , Humanos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Idoso Fragilizado , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos
2.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(13)2022 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35804986

RESUMO

Background: Nivolumab improved patients' survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to evaluate resting energy expenditure (REE) (i.e., patients' basal metabolism) to predict efficacy. Methods: We conducted a monocentric, observational study of mRCC patients receiving nivolumab between October 2015 and May 2020. REE was measured prior to initiating immunotherapy using indirect calorimetry to determine hypo, normo and hypermetabolism. Primary endpoint was 6-month, progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were response rate, PFS and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 51 consecutive patients, 15 (29%) were hypermetabolic, 24 (47%) normometabolic, and 12 (24%) hypometabolic. The 6-month PFS was 15% for hypermetabolic patients and 65% for non-hypermetabolic patients (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, hypermetabolism was the only baseline factor predicting 6-month PFS (OR 9.91, 95%CI [1.62−60.55], p = 0.01). Disease progression was noted as the best response in 73% of hypermetabolic patients and 26% of non-hypermetabolic patients (p = 0.02). Median PFS was 2.8 and 8.7 months (p < 0.01), and median OS was 20.2 and 35.1 months (p = 0.13) in the hypermetabolic and non-hypermetabolic groups, respectively. Conclusions: Our study identifies an association between mRCC patients' energy expenditure and nivolumab efficacy. The measurement of REE by indirect calorimetry in routine practice could help identify patients at risk of nivolumab failure.

3.
Clin Nutr ; 41(5): 1073-1082, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35405584

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Predicting the risk of early limiting toxicity (ELT) is major challenge for the clinician seeking an effective, safe treatment for older patients with cancer. The Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) and CRASH (Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients) toxicity scores were designed to predict chemotherapy-related toxicity. Elevated resting energy expenditure (REE) may predispose to cachexia and increase ELT and mortality in older patients with cancer. The primary objective was to assess the association between elevated REE and ELT in older patients with cancer. The secondary objectives were to assess the discriminant ability of a predictive model including REE (relative to the CARG and CRASH scores) and the prognostic value of elevated REE. METHODS: We assessed patients aged 70 or over included in the prospective ELCAPA cohort between 2014 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were a solid tumour, a measurement of REE at baseline (mREE, by indirect calorimetry), and a geriatric assessment prior to cancer treatment in a teaching hospital (Paris, France). The mREE was compared with the predicted REE (pREE), as defined by the Harris-Benedict equation. Depending on the mREE/pREE ratio, study participants were classified as hypermetabolic, hypometabolic or normometabolic. The primary endpoint was 3-month ELT, defined as any unplanned hospitalization or any event leading to dose reduction, a treatment delay of more than 7 days, or treatment discontinuation within 3 months of initiation. The secondary endpoint was the 3-month mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were included. The median age was 80 [interquartile range: 76-84] years, 37% of the patients were female, 81.8% had metastatic disease, 67.6% received chemotherapy, 20.7% received hormone therapy, and 11.7% received targeted therapies. According to the mREE/pREE ratio, 85 patients (47%) were hypermetabolic, 63 (35%) were normometabolic, and 31 (18%) were hypometabolic. Sixty patients (33.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 26.7-40.9) experienced ELT. The discriminant ability (as assessed by the C-index) of a multivariate model including REE and adjustment factors was 0.82 [95%CI: 0.73-0.91]. In comparison, the discriminant ability of the CARG and CRASH models was 0.57 [0.45-0.68] and 0.51 [0.40-0.62], respectively. In our model, hypermetabolism was an independent risk factor for ELT (adjusted odds ratio = 2.44; 95%CI: 1.02-5.80). Other risk factors were the cancer type and stage, the treatment protocol, a clinical diagnosis of depression, the presence of grade 3 or 4 comorbidities, and the serum lactate dehydrogenase level. CONCLUSION: Hypermetabolism status is an independent predictor of ELT in older patients with cancer, relative to normometabolic status. Baseline REE measurement might improve the ELT risk assessment and decision-making process.


Assuntos
Metabolismo Basal , Neoplasias , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Calorimetria Indireta , Metabolismo Energético , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos
4.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 88(4): 741-751, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34304283

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) has become a major issue in cancer patients. However, data in sarcoma patients are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and the factors associated with DDI with antitumor treatments, and to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist evaluation before anticancer treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive sarcoma patients starting chemotherapy (CT) or Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). A pharmacist performed medication reconciliation and established an early toxicity risk assessment. Potential DDI with antitumor drugs were identified using Micromedex electronic software. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two soft-tissue and 80 bone sarcoma patients (103 males, median age 50 years,) were included before CT (86%) or TKI (14%). The median number of medications was 3; 34 patients (22% of patients with medication reconciliation) reported complementary medicine use. 37 potential DDI classified as major, were identified (12% of the 243 pre-therapeutic assessments). In multivariate analysis, TKI (p < 0.0001), proton pump inhibitor (p = 0.026) and antidepressant (p < 0.001) were identified as risk factors of DDI (p < 0.02). Only marital status (p = 0.003) was associated with complementary medicine use. A pharmacist performed 157 medication reconciliations and made 71 interventions among 59 patients (37%). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with pharmacist intervention were: complementary medicines (p = 0.004), drugs number (p = 0.005) and treatment with TKI (p = 0.0002) CONCLUSIONS: Clinical interventions on DDI are more frequently required among sarcoma patients treated with TKI than CT. Multidisciplinary risk assessment including a medication reconciliation by a pharmacist could be crucial to prevent DDI with TKI.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Sarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/patologia , Interações Medicamentosas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Assistência Farmacêutica/organização & administração , Papel Profissional , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Sarcoma/patologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/patologia
5.
Clin Nutr ; 37(2): 558-565, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28143668

RESUMO

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Alterations of nutritional and performance status (PS) are associated with higher risk of chemotherapy toxicity. Increased resting energy expenditure (REE) is frequent in cancer patients and may contribute to cachexia. We investigated whether abnormal energetic metabolism could predict early acute limiting toxicities (ELT) of anticancer treatments. METHODS: In this observational monocentric study, REE was measured by indirect calorimetry before treatment initiation. Based on the ratio of measured REE to REE predicted by the Harris-Benedict formula, patients were classified as hypometabolic (<90%), normometabolic (90-110%) or hypermetabolic (>110%). Body mass index, weight loss, PS, albumin, transthyretin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and muscle mass (CT-scan) were studied. Were defined as ELT any unplanned hospitalization or any adverse event leading to dose reduction or discontinuation during the first cycle of treatment. RESULTS: We enrolled 277 patients: 76% had metastatic disease; 89% received chemotherapy and 11% targeted therapy; 29% were normometabolic, 51% hypermetabolic and 20% hypometabolic. Fifty-nine patients (21%) experienced an ELT. Toxicity was associated with abnormal metabolism (vs normal: OR = 2.37 [1.13-4.94], p = 0.023), PS (2-3 vs 0-1: OR = 2.04 [1.12-3.74], p = 0.023), albumin (<35 vs ≥35 g/l: OR = 2.39 [1.03-5.54], p = 0.048), and inflammation (CRP ≥10 vs <10 mg/l: OR = 2.43 [1.35-4.38], p = 0.004). To predict toxicity, the most sensitive parameter was the REE (83%) followed by PINI (63%), GPS (59%), CRP (55%), PS (41%), NRI (37%), and albumin (16%). In multivariate analysis, elevated CRP was an independent predictor of toxicity (p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Abnormal basal energy metabolism identifies patients at higher risk of treatment-related acute complications.


Assuntos
Metabolismo Basal/fisiologia , Caquexia/complicações , Caquexia/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Caquexia/fisiopatologia , Calorimetria Indireta , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Descanso , Medição de Risco
6.
Bull Cancer ; 104(11): 946-955, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29150094

RESUMO

Cancer is a disease of the elderly as demonstrated by the epidemiological evolution of Western countries. Indeed, two third of cancers newly diagnosed occur over 65 years. However, older cancer patients have been often excluded from clinical trials in oncology and the extrapolation of cancer treatments in this population remains difficult in practice. Scientific societies recommend that a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) be performed in patients aged 70 and over and selected using screening tools for frailty such as the G8 index. The CGA allows to detect aging-related vulnerabilities in various domains (comorbidities, polypharmacy, autonomy, nutrition, mobility, cognition, mood, social) and associated with adverse outcomes during cancer treatment (reduced overall survival, perioperative complications, toxicity-related chemotherapy). The CGA is allow to elaborate a personalized treatment plan in geriatric oncology. However, to date, no algorithms based on CGA is validated to guide therapeutic decision in geriatric oncology. The collaboration between geriatrician and oncologist remains essential to elaborate an appropriate therapeutic strategy and limit the situations of over- and under-treatment. This article presents the set of tools and scores used in geriatric oncology to guide the therapeutic decision.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Avaliação Geriátrica , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Medicina de Precisão , Prognóstico , Atividades Cotidianas , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cognição , Comorbidade , Fragilidade , Geriatria , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Expectativa de Vida , Oncologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Estado Nutricional , Seleção de Pacientes , Polimedicação , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
7.
Bull Cancer ; 103(3): 259-72, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26832420

RESUMO

Angiogenesis inhibition is a major antitumor strategy that has emerged during the last decade. Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting the VEGF receptor, including sunitinib, sorafenib, axitinib, regorafenib, pazopanib, and vandetanib reduce tumor growth and metastasis. These agents are approved for the treatment of metastatic diseases in first or second-line. They display a narrow therapeutic index. However, data in the elderly and/or in patients with multiple illnesses remain scarce. This population is classically excluded from clinical trials. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of existing literature regarding antiangiogenic TKI tolerance in the elderly (>70 years old). We also highlight key points of the pre-therapeutic evaluation and summarize the management of common toxicities.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/efeitos adversos , Neovascularização Patológica/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/antagonistas & inibidores , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Axitinibe , Fadiga/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Imidazóis/efeitos adversos , Indazóis/efeitos adversos , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Niacinamida/efeitos adversos , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Quinazolinas/efeitos adversos , Sorafenibe , Sunitinibe
8.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 76(5): 1033-9, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26420236

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is widely used in relapsing ovarian carcinoma. Its original formulation is metabolized by the monocyte-macrophage system. One of its main toxicities is the palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) syndrome. To date, no predictive factors of PPE have been identified. METHODS: Data of patients (pts) treated with PLD between 2005 and 2014 were retrospectively collected. A case-control study was performed, comparing main baseline clinical and biological characteristics of pts experiencing PPE and those who did not, after at least three cycles of PLD. A pilot analysis of blood monocyte subpopulations (classical, intermediate and non-classical) was performed by FACS in selected pts. RESULTS: Among 88 pts treated with PLD, 28 experienced PPE of any grade (31, 95 % CI 21-41). The first occurrence of PPE was at first cycle in only 11 % of pts, peaked at cycle 2 (32 %) and represented 57 % of cases after cycle 3. Baseline characteristics of pts with PPE were compared to 27 control pts who received at least 3 cycles. Older pts represented 61 % of pts with PPE and 15 % of pts without PPE (p = 0.04 by Chi-square test). Monocyte count and inflammatory parameters were not associated with PPE. However, the analysis of monocyte subpopulations revealed a large inter-patient variability. CONCLUSION: Contrary to most acute toxicities, PPE occurred more frequently after several cycles, suggesting a PLD body accumulation through repeated cycles. PPE was more frequent in pts older than 70 years. Monocyte subpopulations may have different roles on PLD metabolism and warrant further studies.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Síndrome Mão-Pé/etiologia , Monócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Doenças Hematológicas/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Projetos Piloto , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Estomatite/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias do Timo/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto Jovem
9.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 13(5): 663-73, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24693873

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Sorafenib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Considerable clinical experience has been accumulated since its first Phase III clinical trial in metastatic renal cancer patients in 2007. The management of its early acute toxicity in fit patients is well known. The management of prolonged treatment becomes the new challenge. AREAS COVERED: Using sorafenib as a key word for PubMed search, we review preclinical and clinical data and discuss the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sorafenib, its acute and cumulative toxicities and their consequences for patient management. EXPERT OPINION: The systematic multi-disciplinary risk assessment of cancer patients prior to TKI initiation reduces the risks of acute and late toxicity, especially drug-drug interactions and arterial risks. Sarcopenia is now identified as a major risk of severe toxicity. The very diverse clinical pictures of cumulative toxicity must be known. The monitoring of sorafenib systemic exposure is helpful especially in elderly patients. Moreover, at disease progression, it allows distinguishing between underexposure to sorafenib and truly acquired resistance to the drug. The optimal use of sorafenib should allow improving the reported results of flat-dose. Finally, most of this knowledge could be used for the development and optimal use of the other TKIs.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Administração de Caso , Interações Medicamentosas , Humanos , Niacinamida/administração & dosagem , Niacinamida/efeitos adversos , Niacinamida/farmacocinética , Niacinamida/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Fenilureia/farmacocinética , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacocinética , Medição de Risco , Sorafenibe
10.
J Oncol Pract ; 8(4): 205-10, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23180982

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Ambulatory chemotherapy is patient friendly but may result in toxicity-induced unscheduled hospitalizations (TIUHs). This emerging issue may increase health care costs. We studied the cost effectiveness of a hospital-home monitoring program based on systematic iterative telephone calls after chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the rates of chemotherapy-induced unscheduled hospitalizations in patients who were treated in August 2008. Patients were contacted by telephone 1 day before chemotherapy and on the second and eighth days after undergoing chemotherapy. Costs associated with TIUHs were calculated and compared with those of a cohort concomitantly treated using the standard follow-up procedure. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients entered the hospital-home monitoring program. They were compared with 86 patients who had similar characteristics but underwent the standard treatment and follow-up procedure. Inclusion in the hospital-home monitoring program resulted in patients experiencing TIUHs approximately half as frequently as patients in the other group (2.4% v 4.9%; P < .01). Patients in the program experienced TIUHs for a median length of stay of 4 days, representing a nonsignificant reduction in duration of hospitalization (P not significant). Consequently, through a two-fold reduction in TIUH annual incidence, this program represents a reduction in unscheduled hospitalizations per year of 383 days, decreasing hospital costs by €201.468 ($292,468) per year. CONCLUSION: The hospital-home monitoring program is a cost-effective strategy for offering ambulatory chemotherapy treatment to patients with cancer. This program has become our standard procedure for ambulatory chemotherapy in patients with cancer.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial , Antineoplásicos/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA