The PTB water calorimeter for determining the absolute absorbed dose to water in ultra-high pulse dose rate electron beams.

Objective. The purpose of this investigation is to establish the water calorimeter as the primary standard in PTB's ultra-high pulse dose rate (UHPDR) 20 MeV reference electron beams.Approach. The calorimetric measurements were performed at the PTB research linac facility using the UHPDR reference electron beam setups that enable a dose per pulse between about 0.1 Gy and 6 Gy. The beam is monitored by an in-flange integrating current transformer. The correction factors required to determine the absorbed dose to water were evaluated using thermal and Monte Carlo simulations. Measurements were performed with different total doses delivered per pulse by modifying the instantaneous dose rate within a pulse and by changing the pulse length. The obtained temperature-time traces were compared to the simulated ones to validate the thermal simulations. In addition, absorbed-dose-to-water measurements obtained using the secondary standard alanine dosimeter system were compared to measurements performed with the primary standard.Main results. The simulated and measured temperature-time traces were shown to be consistent, within combined uncertainties, with one another. Measurements with alanine dosimeters proved to be consistent withink= 1 of the total combined uncertainty with the absorbed dose to water determined using the primary standard.Significance. The total relative standard uncertainty of absorbed dose to water determined using the PTB water calorimeter primary standard in UHPDR electron beams was estimated to be less than 0.5%, and the combined correction factors were found to deviate from 1 by less than 1% for both PTB UHPDR 20 MeV reference electron beams. The water calorimeter is therefore considered to be an established primary standard for the higher energy UHPDR reference electron beams.

Absorbed-dose-to-water measurement using alanine in ultra-high-pulse-dose-rate electron beams.

Objective. The aim of the presented study is to evaluate the dose response of the PTB's secondary standard system, which is based on alanine and electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy measurement, in ultra-high-pulse-dose-rate (UHPDR) electron beams.Approach. The alanine dosimeter system was evaluated in the PTB's UHPDR electron beams (20 MeV) in a range of 0.15-6.2 Gy per pulse. The relationship between the obtained absorbed dose to water per pulse and the in-beamline charge measurement of the electron pulses acquired using an integrating current transformer (ICT) was evaluated. Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine the beam quality conversion and correction factors required to perform alanine dosimetry.Main results. The beam quality conversion factor from the reference quality60Co to 20 MeV obtained by Monte Carlo simulation, 1.010(1), was found to be within the standard uncertainty of the consensus value, 1.014(5). The dose-to-water relative standard uncertainty was determined to be 0.68% in PTB's UHPDR electron beams.Significance. In this investigation, the dose-response of the PTB's alanine dosimeter system was evaluated in a range of dose per pulse between 0.15 Gy and 6.2 Gy and no evidence of dose-response dependency of the PTB's secondary standard system based on alanine was observed. The alanine/ESR system was shown to be a precise dosimetry system for evaluating absorbed dose to water in UHPDR electron beams.

The probe-format graphite calorimeter, Aerrow, for absolute dosimetry in ultrahigh pulse dose rate electron beams.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the use of a probe-format graphite calorimeter, Aerrow, as an absolute and relative dosimeter of high-energy pulse dose rate (UHPDR) electron beams for in-water reference and depth-dose-type measurements, respectively. METHODS: In this paper, the calorimeter system is used to investigate the potential influence of dose per pulses delivered up to 5.6 Gy, the number of pulses delivered per measurement, and its potential for relative measurement (depth-dose curve measurement). The calorimeter system is directly compared against an Advanced Markus ion chamber. The finite element method was used to calculate heat transfer corrections along the percentage depth dose of a 20-MeV electron beam. Monte Carlo-calculated dose conversion factors necessary to calculate absorbed dose-to-water at a point from the measured dose-to-graphite are also presented. RESULTS: The comparison of Aerrow against a fully calibrated Advanced Markus chamber, corrected for the saturation effect, has shown consistent results in terms of dose-to-water determination. The measured reference depth is within 0.5 mm from the expected value from Monte Carlo simulation. The relative standard uncertainty estimated for Aerrow was 1.06%, which is larger compared to alanine dosimetry (McEwen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/52/2/272) but has the advantage of being a real-time detector. CONCLUSION: In this investigation, it was demonstrated that the Aerrow probe-type graphite calorimeter can be used for relative and absolute dosimetries in water in an UHPDR electron beam. To the author's knowledge, this is the first reported use of an absorbed dose calorimeter for an in-water percentage depth-dose curve measurement. The use of the Aerrow in quasi-adiabatic mode has greatly simplified the signal readout, compared to isothermal mode, as the resistance was directly measured with a high-stability digital multimeter.

Characterization of the PTB ultra-high pulse dose rate reference electron beam.

Purpose. This investigation aims to present the characterisation and optimisation of an ultra-high pulse dose rate (UHPDR) electron beam at the PTB facility in Germany. A Monte Carlo beam model has been developed for dosimetry study for future investigation in FLASH radiotherapy and will be presented.Material and methods. The 20 MeV electron beams generated by the research linear accelerator has been characterised both in-beamline with profile monitors and magnet spectrometer, and in-water with a diamond detector prototype. The Monte Carlo model has been used to investigate six different setups to enable different dose per pulse (DPP) ranges and beam sizes in water. The properties of the electron radiation field in water have also been characterised in terms of beam size, quality specifierR50and flatness. The beam stability has also been studied.Results. The difference between the Monte-Carlo simulated and measuredR50was smaller than 0.5 mm. The simulated beam sizes agreed with the measured ones within 2 mm. Two suitable setups have been identified for delivering reference UHPDR electron beams. The first one is characterised by a SSD of 70 cm, while in the second one an SSD of 90 cm is used in combination with a 2 mm aluminium scattering plates. The two set-ups are quick and simple to install and enable an expected overall DPP range from 0.13 Gy up to 6.7 Gy per pulse.Conclusion. The electron beams generated by the PTB research accelerator have shown to be stable throughout the four-months length of this investigation. The Monte Carlo models have shown to be in good agreement for beam size and depth dose and within 1% for the beam flatness. The diamond detector prototype has shown to be a promising tool to be used for relative measurements in UHPDR electron beams.

Determination of Wair in high-energy electron beams using graphite detectors.

PURPOSE: ICRU Report 90 on Key Data for Ionizing-Radiation Dosimetry: Measurement Standards and Applications (2014) has reaffirmed the recommended value of the mean energy required to create an ion pair in air, Wair , to be 33.97(12) eV. The report also indicates that this "constant" of radiation dosimetry is energy independent above 10 keV, since there is no theoretical or experimental evidence to the contrary. The goal of this investigation is to obtain additional experimental determinations of Wair in high energy beams and thus to verify the suggested energy independence. METHODS: Wair can be evaluated by combining ionometric and calorimetric measurements with a calculated ratio of the absorbed dose in the ion chamber air cavity and that of the calorimeter absorbing element. In this investigation, a graphite parallel plate chamber and a graphite calorimeter were used and the dose ratio was calculated using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code. Measurements were made in electron beams from the NRC Vickers linear accelerator at two incident energies, 20 and 35 MeV. A range of average energies at the measurement point were obtained by inserting graphite plates in the primary beam. RESULTS: The average value of Wair obtained in this investigation is 33.85(18) eV which is consistent with the recommended value of 33.97(12) eV where the number in brackets represents the combined standard uncertainty of the value, referring to the corresponding last digits. The individual values of Wair do not show any statistically significant energy dependence. CONCLUSION: The overall combined uncertainty of 0.5% meets the original target of the investigation. A larger-scale investigation, involving more individual energy points and a wider range of electron energies is required to go further and, for example, comment on the Wair energy dependency question raised by Tessier et al. [Med. Phys. 2018;45:370-381].

Technical Note: Out-of-field dose measurement at near surface with plastic scintillator detector.

Out-of-field dose depends on multiple factors, making peripheral dosimetry com-plex. Only a few dosimeters have the required features for measuring peripheral dose. Plastic scintillator dosimeters (PSDs) offer numerous dosimetric advantages as required for out-of-field dosimetry. The purpose of this study is to determine the potential of using PSD as a surface peripheral dosimeter. Measurements were performed with a parallel-plate ion chamber, a small volume ion chamber, and with a PSD. Lateral-dose measurements (LDM) at 0.5 cm depth and depth-dose curve (PDD) were made and compared to the dose calculation provided by a treatment planning system (TPS). This study shows that a PSD can measure a dose as low as 0.51 ± 0.17 cGy for photon beam and 0.58 ± 0.20 cGy for electron beam with a difference of 0.2 and 0.1 cGy compared to a parallel-plate ion chamber. This study demonstrates the potential of using PSD as an out-of-field dosimeter since measure-ments with PSD avoid averaging over a too-large depth, at 1 mm diameter, and can make precise measurement at very low dose. Also, electronic equilibrium is easier to reach with PSD due to its small sensitive volume and its water equivalence.