Video review of the frequency and assessment of head impacts during the FIFA Arab Cup 2021TM.

We used injury spotters and video footage review to establish the frequency of head impacts, their characteristics, and the subsequent medical assessment during the FIFA Arab Cup 2021TM. Six defined video signs of potential concussion based on an international consensus were used. A total of 88 head impacts were observed, with a median of 2 (IQR 1.5-4, range 0-7) head impacts per match, of which 44 (50%) resulted in on-pitch medical assessment. The median assessment duration was 51s (IQR 34-65s, range 19-262s). The most common mechanism was head-to-head contact (27% of all impacts and 43% of impacts with medical assessment). Seven head impacts showed video signs of potential concussion: six had one sign and one had two signs. The concussion substitution was used in three incidents. Head impacts during the FIFA Arab Cup were common and a median of 1 head impact per game required an on-pitch medical assessment. Only 8% of the head impacts showed any video sign of potential concussion, and only 3% resulted in a concussion substitution. The medical on-pitch assessments appeared too short (<1 min) to allow an appropriate assessment of all head impacts, indicating a need for further evaluation. Further standardisation of the injury spotter's role in football is recommended.

Development of a rating scale for objective assessment of performance in laparoscopic appendicectomy surgery.

BACKGROUNDS: Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) is the most common index procedure for junior surgical trainees. Despite the shift towards competency-based training, there is no method of quantitatively assessing performance during LA. This study aimed to obtain expert consensus regarding the items required to create a LA Rating Scale (LARS). METHODS: A list of steps required for LA surgery, as well as descriptors of "poor", "average" and "excellent" performance for each of these steps were created for potential inclusion into an objective assessment tool for LA surgery. Using a Delphi method, 20 experts from multiple institutions rated on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 the suitability of these steps and descriptors of performance. Responses were obtained until consensus (Cronbach's α > 0.8) was achieved. RESULTS: Fifteen experts participated in the study. Consensus was achieved for all items during the first iteration of the Delphi with a Cronbach's α of 0.96. The Cronbach's α for the steps was 0.87 and 0.92 for the descriptors of performance. Steps and descriptors of performance that >80% of experts rated as ≥4 were used to create the final LARS tool. CONCLUSION: Multi-institutional expert consensus was obtained regarding the steps and, for the first time, descriptors of performance for LA, demonstrating their face and content validity, as well as generalisability. Subsequently, the LARS tool was created that can be used to quantitatively assess intra-operative performance. This instrument can be used to identify weaknesses in performance and facilitate deliberate practice, thus shifting training in LA to a competency-based approach.