Predictive value of a comprehensive atrial assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: keep it simple.

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can provide a multi-parametric evaluation of left atrial (LA) size and function. A complete CMR-based LA assessment might improve the risk stratification of patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We performed a comprehensive CMR-based evaluation of LA size and function, in order to assess the prognostic impact of specific LA parameters in DCM. Secondary analysis of a prospective registry (UHSM-CMR study, NCT02326324) including 648 consecutive patients with DCM and CMR evaluation of LA area and LA length. Of these, 456 had complete LA assessment covering reservoir, conduit and booster pump function and including LA reservoir strain evaluated with feature tracking. The heart failure (HF) endpoint included HF hospitalizations, HF death and heart transplant. The arrhythmic endpoint included ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (sustained or treated by implantable defibrillator) and sudden death (SD). At median follow-up of 23 months, 34 patients reached the HF endpoint; in a multivariable model including NYHA class and LVEF, LA length had incremental predictive value. LA length ≥ 69 mm was the best cut-off to predict HF events (adjusted HR 2.3, p = 0.03). Among the 456 patients with comprehensive LA assessment, only LA length was independently associated with the HF endpoint after adjusting for LVEF and NYHA class. By contrast, no LA parameter independently predicted the arrhythmic risk. In DCM patients, LA length is an independent predictor of HF events, showing stronger association than other more complex parameters of LA function. No atrial parameter predicts the risk of VA and SD.

Pilot randomized trial of an electronic symptom monitoring and reporting intervention for hospitalized adults undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: Patients undergoing a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) have varied symptoms during their hospitalization. This study examined whether daily symptom reporting (with electronic patient-reported outcomes [PROs]) in an inpatient bone marrow transplant clinic reduced symptom burden on post-transplant days +7, +10, and +14. METHODS: A prospective, single-institution 1:1 pilot randomized, two-arm study recruited HCT patients. HCT inpatients (N = 76) reported daily on 16 common symptoms using the PRO version of the Common Terminology for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Fisher's exact test was used to examine differences in the proportion of patients reporting individual symptoms. Multivariable linear regression modeling was used to examine group differences in peak symptom burden, while controlling for symptom burden at baseline, age, comorbidity, and transplantation type (autologous or allogeneic). RESULTS: HCT patients receiving the PRO intervention also experienced lower peak symptom burden (average of 16 symptoms) at days +7, +10, and +14 (10.4 vs 14.5, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Daily use of electronic symptom reporting to nurses in an inpatient bone marrow transplant clinic reduced peak symptom burden and improved individual symptoms during the 2 weeks post-transplant. A multi-site trial is warranted to demonstrate the generalizability, efficacy, and value of this intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02574897.