RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in outcomes after heart transplantation, black recipients have worse survival compared with non-black recipients. The source of such disparate outcomes remains largely unknown. We hypothesize that a propensity to generate de-novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) and subsequent antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) may account for racial differences in sub-optimal outcomes after heart transplant. In this study we aimed to determine the role of dnDSA and AMR in racial disparities in post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: This study was a single-center, retrospective analysis of 137 heart transplant recipients (81% male, 48% black) discharged from Emory University Hospital. Patients were classified as black vs non-black for the purpose of our analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between race and selected outcomes. The primary outcome was the development of dnDSA. Secondary outcomes included treated AMR and a composite of all-cause graft dysfunction or death. RESULTS: After 3.7 years of follow-up, 39 (28.5%) patients developed dnDSA and 19 (13.8%) were treated for AMR. In multivariable models, black race was associated with a higher risk of developing dnDSA (hazard ratio [HR] 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54 to 8.65, p = 0.003) and a higher risk of treated AMR (HR 4.86, 95% CI 1.26 to 18.72, p = 0.021) compared with non-black race. Black race was also associated with a higher risk of all-cause graft dysfunction or death in univariate analyses (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 4.30, p = 0.044). However, in a multivariable model incorporating dnDSA, black race was no longer a significant risk factor. Only dnDSA development was significantly associated with all-cause graft dysfunction or death (HR 4.85, 95% CI 1.89 to 12.44, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Black transplant recipients are at higher risk for the development of dnDSA and treated AMR, which may account for racial disparities in outcomes after heart transplantation.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Rejeição de Enxerto/sangue , Rejeição de Enxerto/etnologia , Transplante de Coração/efeitos adversos , Isoanticorpos/sangue , Adulto , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/mortalidade , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In December of 2014, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network implemented a new Kidney Allocation System (KAS) for deceased donor transplant, with increased priority for highly sensitized candidates (calculated panel-reactive antibody [cPRA] >99%). We used a modified version of the new KAS to address issues of access and equity for these candidates. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a simulation, 10,988 deceased donor kidneys transplanted into waitlisted recipients in 2010 were instead allocated to candidates with cPRA≥80% (n=18,004). Each candidate's unacceptable donor HLA antigens had been entered into the allocation system by the transplant center. In simulated match runs, kidneys were allocated sequentially to adult ABO identical or permissible candidates with cPRA 100%, 99%, 98%, etc. to 80%. Allocations were restricted to donor/recipient pairs with negative virtual crossmatches. RESULTS: The simulation indicated that 2111 of 10,988 kidneys (19.2%) would have been allocated to patients with cPRA 100% versus 74 of 10,988 (0.7%) that were actually transplanted. Of cPRA 100% candidates, 74% were predicted to be compatible with an average of six deceased donors; the remaining 26% seemed to be incompatible with every deceased donor organ that entered the system. Of kidneys actually allocated to cPRA 100% candidates in 2010, 66% (49 of 74) were six-antigen HLA matched/zero-antigen mismatched (HLA-A, -B, and -DR) with their recipients versus only 11% (237 of 2111) in the simulation. The simulation predicted that 10,356 of 14,433 (72%) candidates with cPRA 90%-100% could be allocated an organ compared with 7.3% who actually underwent transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Data in this simulation are consistent with early results of the new KAS; specifically, nearly 20% of deceased donor kidneys were (virtually) compatible with cPRA 100% candidates. Although most of these candidates were predicted to be compatible with multiple donors, approximately one-quarter are unlikely to receive a single offer.
Assuntos
Seleção do Doador , Antígenos HLA/imunologia , Histocompatibilidade , Isoanticorpos/sangue , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Biomarcadores/sangue , Simulação por Computador , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Estados Unidos , Listas de EsperaRESUMO
Antibodies against HLA molecules are formed in response to exposure to foreign HLA molecules, which can occur as a result of blood transfusion, pregnancy, or transplant. Blood components, particularly those containing cellular elements, are the most common cause of HLA antibodies. This unit describes technical aspects of the flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM), flow cytometric microparticle assays, and cell-based flow cytometric screening assays. The collective goal for these assays is to clearly identify the presence of HLA antibody, determine the titer of antibody, and elucidate the specificities (i.e., HLA antigens) to which they will react. Knowledge of this information is critical for organ allocation and accurate assessment of the immunological risk for a patient at the time of transplantation. In addition, the identification of HLA antibodies in blood components may be useful in planning appropriate transfusion support strategies for selected patients.