O-phenylphenol and its sodium and potassium salts: a toxicological assessment.

Ortho-phenylphenol (OPP) and its sodium (SOPP) and potassium (POPP) salts are used as fungicides and disinfectants. Due to the widespread use of especially OPP and SOPP, the potential for consumer exposure and some "critical" findings the toxicological database is quite extensive and complex. In experimental animals toxicity after single oral and dermal administration of these compounds is low. For the skin and mucous membranes, OPP has to be considered as irritating, and SOPP and POPP as corrosive. A large number of chronic toxicity and reproduction studies did not show any indication of oestrogen-like or other endocrine effects of OPP in the mammalian organism. No teratogenic effects were observed after the administration of OPP or SOPP in rats, mice, and rabbits. In two-generation studies in rats, OPP did not affect reproduction. The available data do not suggest a relevant potential for immunotoxic properties. The administration of high dietary concentrations of OPP to mice up to 2 years induced hepatocellular changes indicative of adaptations to metabolic demands, zonal degeneration, focal hepatocellular necrosis, and/or pigmentation of the liver. Only in male mice of one study, using a strain prone to develop hepatocellular tumors at high spontaneous incidences, the incidence of hepatocellular adenomas was increased. The incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas was not affected by treatment. The urothel of the urinary bladder (at very high doses also of the renal pelvis and the papilla) is the main target tissue after the repeated oral exposure of rats. The changes initially consist of increased mitosis, followed by simple epithelial hyperplasia, developing to a papillary and/or nodular form, later on to papillomas and transitional carcinomas. Crystals or stones in the bladder do not play a decisive role in this cascade. SOPP is more effective than OPP in this respect. Male rats are much more sensitive than females. In mice, hamsters, guinea pigs, and dogs, urothelial lesions do not develop even at very high oral dose levels. The findings in rats explain why there is a large genotoxicity/mutagenicity data base not only for OPP and SOPP but also for their metabolites on nearly all kinds of endpoints/targets. The weight of evidence suggests that genotoxicity of OPP/SOPP or their metabolites does not play a decisive role for the carcinogenicity at the urothel. Among them are lack of DNA binding of OPP to the rat bladder epithelium, the differences between OPP and SOPP, between male and female rats, between rats and mice (despite roughly comparable toxicokinetics), as well as the fact that tumors develop only at dose levels inducing hyperplasias. In addition, the strong dependence of the incidence and severity of the nonneoplastic and neoplastic bladder changes on urinary pH values (modified by feeding of ammonium chloride or sodium hydrogen carbonate) is consistent with the hypothesis of a nongenotoxic mode of action. Finally, there is no correlation between the urinary concentration of OPP or its metabolites and the incidence of hyperplasias/tumors in the urinary bladder. Both tumorigenic effects in rats and male mice are considered to represent high-dose, sex- and/or species-specific phenomena, based on nongenotoxic mechanisms of action and therefore allow the conclusion that the conventional margin of safety approaches are appropriate when assessing the risk of applications of OPP and its salts.

[In vitro methods for phototoxicity and photocarcinogenicity testing of drugs]. / In vitro Methoden zur Prüfung von Arzneimitteln auf photogenotoxische/photokanzerogene Eigenschaften.

Phototoxicity is an acknowledged property of some UV and/or visible light absorbing substances some of which are used as pharmaceuticals or in cosmetic preparations. In recent years attention has been called upon the fact that toxic intermediates that are generated upon photoactivation of a substance can also lead to DNA damage. Such damage may lead to mutated/initiated skin cells which in turn can contribute to an elevated skin cancer risk. The method of choice to test for photo-related skin carcinogenesis is a 1-year study in genetically hairless mice in which the formation of skin papilloma and their latency time are assessed. Here, in vitro test approaches to test for photogenotoxicity can be used in a tiered assessment approach asking the use of in vitro genotoxicity tests for prediction of rodent/human carcinogenicity. In the past few years some effort has been put into the evaluation for such systems, in particular standard test protocols have been generated for the in vitro photo-micronucleus test and the in vitro photo-comet assay with Chinese hamster V79 cells. The data that have been produced so far show promising results regarding the implementation of these systems in a tiered approach for photocarcinogenicity assessment of UV- and/or visible light absorbing substances but the systems will have to be validated in further collaborative studies.

Considerations on photochemical genotoxicity: report of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures Working Group.

Recent toxicological observations have caused concern regarding the need to test, for example, pharmaceuticals and cosmetic products for photochemical genotoxicity. The objective of this report is to give assistance on how to adapt existing test methods to investigate the potential of light-absorbing compounds to induce genotoxic effects on photoactivation. In general, the Organization for Economic Co-Operation & Economic Development (OECD) draft guideline on in vitro phototoxicity testing served as a basis for consideration. Concomitant exposure of the cells to the test compound and solar simulated light was considered appropriate as the initial, basic test condition. Optimization of the exposure scheme, e.g., a change of the irradiation spectrum, might be indicated depending on the initial test results. Selection of test compound concentrations should be based on results obtained with the dark version of the respective test system but might have to be modified if phototoxic effects are observed. Selection of the irradiation dose has to be performed individually for each test system based on dose-effect studies. The irradiation should induce per se a small, reproducible toxic or genotoxic effect. The report includes a specification of necessary controls, discusses factors that might have an impact on the irradiation characteristics, and gives a rationale for the omission of an external metabolic activation system. It also addresses the question that physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties might trigger the need to test a chemical for photochemical genotoxicity. Relevant experimental observations are presented to back up the recommendations. The working group did not reach a consensus as to whether a single, adequately perfomed in vitro test for clastogenicity would be sufficient to exclude a photogenotoxic liability or whether a test battery including a gene mutation assay would be needed for product safety testing regarding photochemical genotoxicity.