Combining SARS-CoV-2 interferon-gamma release assay with humoral response assessment to define immune memory profiles.

OBJECTIVES: In the post-SARS-CoV-2 pandemic era, "breakthrough infections" are still documented, due to variants of concerns (VoCs) emergence and waning humoral immunity. Despite widespread utilization, the definition of the anti-Spike (S) immunoglobulin-G (IgG) threshold to define protection has unveiled several limitations. Here, we explore the advantages of incorporating T-cell response assessment to enhance the definition of immune memory profile. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 interferon-gamma release assay test (IGRA) was performed on samples collected longitudinally from immunocompetent healthcare workers throughout their immunization by infection and/or vaccination, anti-receptor-binding domain IgG levels were assessed in parallel. The risk of symptomatic infection according to cellular/humoral immune capacities during Omicron BA.1 wave was then estimated. RESULTS: Close to 40% of our samples were exclusively IGRA-positive, largely due to time elapsed since their last immunization. This suggests that individuals have sustained long-lasting cellular immunity, while they would have been classified as lacking protective immunity based solely on IgG threshold. Moreover, the Cox regression model highlighted that Omicron BA.1 circulation raises the risk of symptomatic infection while increased anti-receptor-binding domain IgG and IGRA levels tended to reduce it. CONCLUSION: The discrepancy between humoral and cellular responses highlights the significance of assessing the overall adaptive immune response. This integrated approach allows the identification of vulnerable subjects and can be of interest to guide antiviral prophylaxis at an individual level.

Longitudinal assessment of IFN-I activity and immune profile in critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Since the onset of the pandemic, only few studies focused on longitudinal immune monitoring in critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) whereas their hospital stay may last for several weeks. Consequently, the question of whether immune parameters may drive or associate with delayed unfavorable outcome in these critically ill patients remains unsolved. METHODS: We present a dynamic description of immuno-inflammatory derangements in 64 critically ill COVID-19 patients including plasma IFNα2 levels and IFN-stimulated genes (ISG) score measurements. RESULTS: ARDS patients presented with persistently decreased lymphocyte count and mHLA-DR expression and increased cytokine levels. Type-I IFN response was initially induced with elevation of IFNα2 levels and ISG score followed by a rapid decrease over time. Survivors and non-survivors presented with apparent common immune responses over the first 3 weeks after ICU admission mixing gradual return to normal values of cellular markers and progressive decrease of cytokines levels including IFNα2. Only plasma TNF-α presented with a slow increase over time and higher values in non-survivors compared with survivors. This paralleled with an extremely high occurrence of secondary infections in COVID-19 patients with ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence of ARDS in response to SARS-CoV2 infection appears to be strongly associated with the intensity of immune alterations upon ICU admission of COVID-19 patients. In these critically ill patients, immune profile presents with similarities with the delayed step of immunosuppression described in bacterial sepsis.

Concomitant Assessment of Monocyte HLA-DR Expression and Ex Vivo TNF-α Release as Markers of Adverse Outcome after Various Injuries-Insights from the REALISM Study.

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients develop an altered host immune response after severe injuries. This response may evolve towards a state of persistent immunosuppression that is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The expression of human leukocyte antigen DR on circulating monocytes (mHLA-DR) and ex vivo release of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) by lipopolysaccharide-stimulated whole blood are two related biomarkers offered to characterize this phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to concomitantly evaluate the association between mHLA-DR and TNF-α release and adverse clinical outcome (i.e., death or secondary infection) after severe trauma, sepsis or surgery in a cohort of 353 ICU patients. mHLA-DR and TNF-α release was similarly and significantly reduced in patients whatever the type of injury. Persistent decreases in both markers at days 5-7 (post-admission) were significantly associated with adverse outcomes. Overall, mHLA-DR (measured by flow cytometry) appears to be a more robust and standardized parameter. Each marker can be used individually as a surrogate of immunosuppression, depending on center facilities. Combining these two parameters could be of interest to identify the most immunosuppressed patients presenting with a high risk of worsening. This last aspect deserves further exploration.

Type-I Interferon assessment in 45 minutes using the FilmArray® PCR platform in SARS-CoV-2 and other viral infections.

Low concentrations of type-I interferon (IFN) in blood seem to be associated with more severe forms of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, following the type-I interferon response (IR) in early stage disease is a major challenge. We evaluated detection of a molecular interferon signature on a FilmArray® system, which includes PCR assays for four interferon stimulated genes. We analyzed three types of patient populations: (i) children admitted to a pediatric emergency unit for fever and suspected infection, (ii) ICU-admitted patients with severe COVID-19, and (iii) healthcare workers with mild COVID-19. The results were compared to the reference tools, that is, molecular signature assessed with Nanostring® and IFN-α2 quantification by SIMOA® (Single MOlecule Array). A strong correlation was observed between the IR measured by the FilmArray®, Nanostring®, and SIMOA® platforms (r-Spearman 0.996 and 0.838, respectively). The FilmArray® panel could be used in the COVID-19 pandemic to evaluate the IR in 45-min with 2 min hand-on-time at hospitalization and to monitor the IR in future clinical trials.

Performance Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 PCR Assays Developed by WHO Referral Laboratories.

A reliable diagnostic assay is crucial to early detect new COVID-19 cases and limit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization has published several diagnostic molecular approaches developed by referral laboratories, including Charité (Germany), HKU (Hong Kong), China CDC (China), US CDC (United States), and Institut Pasteur, Paris (France). We aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these different RT-PCR assays using SARS-CoV-2 cell culture supernatants and clinical respiratory samples. Overall, the different RT-PCR assays performed well for SARS-CoV-2 detection and were all specific except the N Charité (Germany), and N2 US CDC (United States) assays. RdRp Institut Pasteur (IP2, IP4), N China CDC, and N1 US CDC were found to be the most sensitive assays. The data presented herein are of prime importance to facilitate the equipment choice of diagnostic laboratories, as well as for the development of marketed tests.

Assessment of automated DNA extraction coupled with real-time PCR for measuring Epstein-Barr virus load in whole blood, peripheral mononuclear cells and plasma.

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA load monitoring in blood has been shown to be essential for the diagnosis of EBV-associated diseases. However, the methods currently used to assess EBV DNA load are often time-consuming and require prior blood separation. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative diagnostic value of EBV DNA load monitoring in whole blood, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and plasma after automated DNA extraction using the MagNA Pure extractor followed by LightCycler real-time quantitative PCR (LC-PCR). STUDY DESIGN: First, EBV DNA load was assessed retrospectively after automated or manual extraction on 104 PBMC specimens. Second, EBV DNA load was determined prospectively with the automated extraction procedure in the whole blood, PBMCs and plasma of 100 samples from patients with EBV-related diseases (group 1, n = 20), HIV-seropositive individuals (group 2, n = 66), and healthy EBV carriers (group 3, n = 14). RESULTS: A good correlation was observed between automated and manual extraction on 104 PBMC specimens (r = 0.956; P < 0.0001). In the prospective study, 67 samples were positive in both whole blood and PBMCs, with a good correlation between EBV DNA loads in whole blood and PBMCs (r = 0.936; P < 0.0001). Only 18/100 samples were positive in plasma. Higher viral loads were regularly observed in the three blood compartments from group 1 than from groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that an automated extraction of EBV DNA is easier to perform in whole blood or plasma than in PBMCs and facilitates the standardisation of EBV DNA measurement by real-time quantitative PCR. The quantitative detection of EBV DNA load in whole blood appeared more sensitive than in plasma for infectious mononucleosis in immunocompetent patients, probably because of a rapid loss of plasmatic EBV DNA. In transplant patients, EBV DNA load monitoring in whole blood and in plasma turned out to be equivalent in terms of feasibility and accuracy for the early diagnosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLDs).