RESUMO
Hydropower generation has advantages for societies that seek low-carbon, renewable energy alternatives, but sustainable hydropower production will require an explicit consideration of potential tradeoffs between socioeconomic and environmental priorities. These tradeoffs are often explored during a formal environmental impact assessment process that can be complex and controversial. The steps taken to address stakeholder concerns through impact hypotheses and field studies are not always transparent. We have created a Checklist of River Function Indicators to facilitate stakeholder discussions during hydropower licensing and to support more transparent, holistic, and scientifically informed hydropower environmental analyses. Based on a database of environmental metrics collected from hydropower project studies documented by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the International Hydropower Association, the Low Impact Hydropower Institute, and peer-reviewed scientific literature, our proposed Checklist of River Function Indicators contains 51 indicators in six categories. We have tested the usefulness of the Indicators by applying them to seven hydropower projects documented by FERC. Among the case study projects, 44 of the 51 Indicators were assessed according to the FERC documentation. Even though each hydropower project presents unique natural resource issues and stakeholder priorities, the proposed Indicators can provide a transparent starting point for stakeholder discussions about which ecological impacts should be considered in hydropower planning and relicensing assessments.
RESUMO
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: There is conclusive evidence demonstrating that formulary restrictions are associated with reduced utilization and pharmacy spending of the restricted drugs. However, prior efforts to implement restrictive formularies have been associated with inconsistent rates of therapy discontinuation and mixed impacts on adherence to therapy. Also, the impact of transferring patients from an already restrictive formulary to a more aggressive model has not been previously examined. This study evaluated the impact of implementation of a more restrictive formulary on therapy disruption, adherence rates, pharmacy costs and generic utilization among patients with common chronic conditions. METHODS: In 2014, CVS Health implemented Value Formulary (VF), a restrictive benefit design with the aim of reducing spending while preserving access to and adherence to essential therapy, was used. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess changes in therapy disruption rates, pharmacy costs and generic dispensing rate (GDR) (for continuers) and medication adherence (for initiators) following the implementation of VF. The study group was selected from members of three existing employer clients transitioned from standard formulary (SF) to VF on January 2014. The control population was a matched group of six employers with the same preperiod formulary structure, business unit, adherence programmes and patient out-of-pocket cost as the study group. The control group retained SF in 2014. To assess therapy disruption after VF implementation, we categorized patients by their subsequent medication use into three groups: (i) therapy stopped, (ii) therapy continued and (iii) therapy switched. Medication adherence was measured as monthly proportion of days covered (PDC). Pharmacy cost and GDR were measured per utilizer per month (PUPM). Rates of therapy disruption in study and control groups were compared using the chi-square test. Differences in monthly PDC between matched groups were evaluated using multivariate linear regression. Impact of VF on pharmacy cost and GDR was measured through segmented regression of interrupted time series data with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A transition from SF to VF influenced drug coverage for approximately 13% of members (as their medications were either no longer covered, or covered restrictively under VF). Compared to patients whose plan sponsors retained SF, the patients that transitioned to VF had a modest (1·3%) but statistically significant increase in therapy discontinuation rates. This was offset by similarly modest improvements in adherence; patients who initiated therapy under VF demonstrated a 1·5% higher adherence to medications as compared to SF patients (P < 0·001). Medication costs in the VF group were lower by $20 PUPM (P < 0·001), and GDR was greater by 4·2% (P < 0·001). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Transition of patients to a more restrictive drug formulary led to modest therapy discontinuation, similarly modest improvements in medication adherence and substantial prescription drug cost savings. As healthcare payors search for ways to control the rapid rise in spending for medications without compromising quality, the Value Formulary can serve as a useful tool.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Genéricos/administração & dosagem , Formulários Farmacêuticos como Assunto , Adesão à Medicação , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Custos de Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/economia , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Assistência Farmacêutica/economia , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the proportion and characteristics of patients injured by medical care in New Zealand public hospitals who complain to an independent health ombudsman, the Health and Disability Commissioner ("the Commissioner"). DESIGN: The percentage of injured patients who lodge complaints was estimated by linking the Commissioner's complaints database to records reviewed in the New Zealand Quality of Healthcare Study (NZQHS). Bivariate and multivariate analyses investigated sociodemographic and socioeconomic differences between complainants and non-complainants. SETTING: New Zealand public hospitals and the Office of the Commissioner in 1998. POPULATION: Patients who lodged claims with the Commissioner (n = 398) and patients identified by the NZQHS as having suffered an adverse event who did not lodge a complaint with the Commissioner (n = 847). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse events, preventable adverse events, and complaints lodged with the Commissioner. RESULTS: Among adverse events identified by the NZQHS, 0.4% (3/850) resulted in complaints; among serious, preventable adverse events 4% (2/48) resulted in complaints. The propensity of injured patients to complain increased steeply with the severity of the injury: odds of complaint were 11 times greater after serious permanent injuries than after temporary injuries, and 18 times greater after deaths. Odds of complaining were significantly lower for patients who were elderly (odds ratio (OR) 0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1 to 0.4), of Pacific ethnicity (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9), or lived in the most deprived areas (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.6). CONCLUSION: Most medical injuries never trigger a complaint to the Commissioner. Among complaints that are brought, severe and preventable injuries are common, offering a potentially valuable "window" on serious threats to patient safety. The relatively low propensity to complain among patients who are elderly, socioeconomically deprived, or of Pacific ethnicity suggests troubling disparities in access to and utilisation of complaints processes.
Assuntos
Imperícia , Erros Médicos , Erros de Medicação , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Gestão da Segurança , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia , Razão de Chances , Satisfação do Paciente , Fatores SocioeconômicosAssuntos
Leis Antitruste , Negociação Coletiva/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/organização & administração , Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Leis Antitruste/história , Negociação Coletiva/história , História do Século XX , Sindicatos/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/legislação & jurisprudência , Médicos/economia , Médicos/organização & administração , Prática Profissional/legislação & jurisprudência , Prática Profissional/organização & administração , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Specific elements of health care process and physician behavior have been shown to influence disenrollment decisions in HMOs, but not in outpatient settings caring for patients with diverse types of insurance coverage. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether physician behavior and process of care affect patients' intention to return to their usual health care practice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional patient survey and medical record review. SETTING: Eleven academically affiliated primary care medicine practices in the Boston area. PATIENTS: 2,782 patients with at least one visit in the preceding year. MEASUREMENT: Unwillingness to return to the usual health care practice. RESULTS: Of the 2,782 patients interviewed, 160 (5.8%) indicated they would not be willing to return. Two variables correlated significantly with unwillingness to return after adjustment for demographics, health status, health care utilization, satisfaction with physician's technical skill, site of care, and clustering of patients by provider: dissatisfaction with visit duration (odds ratio [OR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 7.4) and patient reports that the physician did not listen to what the patient had to say (OR, 8.8; 95% CI, 2.5 to 30.7). In subgroup analysis, patients who were prescribed medications at their last visit but who did not receive an explanation of the purpose of the medication were more likely to be unwilling to return (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.8 to 13.3). CONCLUSION: Failure of physicians to acknowledge patient concerns, provide explanations of care, and spend sufficient time with patients may contribute to patients' decisions to discontinue care at their usual site of care.
Assuntos
Medicina Interna , Satisfação do Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Boston , Competência Clínica , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
In the 1990s more than 41,000 patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous bone marrow transplant (HDC-ABMT) for breast cancer, despite a paucity of clinical evidence of its efficacy. Most health plans reluctantly agreed to cover the treatment in response to intensive political lobbying and the threat of litigation. The results of five recent major randomized trials showed that HDC-ABMT offers no advantage over standard-dose treatment for breast cancer. Our experience with HDC-ABMT coverage cautions against allowing politics to overwhelm science in the area of evaluating experimental procedures, and against relying on the courts as a means of resolving disagreements about coverage of these interventions.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/economia , Transplante de Medula Óssea/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Terapia Combinada , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Política , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The authors' academic medical center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, developed a primary care physician (PCP) salary incentive program for employed academic physicians. This program, first implemented in 1999, was needed to meet the financial imperatives placed on the institution by managed care and the Balanced Budget Act of 1997; its goal was to create a set of incentives for PCPs that is consistent with the mission of the academic center and helps motivate and reward PCP's work. The program sought to simultaneously increase productivity while optimizing resource utilization in a mixed-payer environment. The salary incentive program uses work relative-value units (wRVUs) as the measure of productivity. In addition to productivity-derived base pay, bonus incentives are added for efficient medical management, quality of care, teaching, and seniority. The authors report that there was significant concern from several members of the physician staff before the plan was implemented; they felt that the institution's PCPs were already operating at maximum clinical capacity. However, after the first year of operation of this plan, there was an overall 20% increase in PCP productivity. Increases were observed in all PCP subgroups when stratified by professional experience, clinical time commitment, and practice location. The authors conclude that the program has succeeded in giving incentives for academic PCPs to achieve under the growing demands for revenue self-sufficiency, managed care performance, quality of care, and academic commitment.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Médicos de Família/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo , Boston , Humanos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Salários e Benefícios/economiaRESUMO
Leading patient safety proposals promote the design and implementation of error prevention strategies that target systems used to deliver care and eschew individual blame. They also call for candor among practitioners about the causes and consequences of medical injury. Both goals collide with fundamental tenets of the medical malpractice system. Thus, the challenge of addressing error in medicine demands a thorough reconsideration of the legal mechanisms currently used to deal with harms in health care. In this article, we describe an alternative to litigation that does not predicate compensation on proof of practitioner fault, suggest how it might be operationalized, and argue that there is a pressing need to test its promise. We tackle traditional criticisms of "no-fault" compensation systems for medical injury-specifically, concerns about their cost and the presumption that eliminating liability will dilute incentives to deliver high-quality care. Our recent empirical work suggests that a model designed around avoidable or preventable injuries, as opposed to negligent ones, would not exceed the costs of current malpractice systems in the United States. Implementation of such a model promises to promote quality by harmonizing injury compensation with patient safety objectives, especially if it is linked to reforms that make institutions, rather than individuals, primarily answerable for injuries.
Assuntos
Compensação e Reparação , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/economia , Imperícia/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Análise Atuarial , Colorado , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Reforma dos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Formulação de Políticas , Estados Unidos , Utah , Ferimentos e Lesões/economiaAssuntos
Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/economia , Erros Médicos/economia , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/prevenção & controle , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Nova Zelândia , Reembolso de Incentivo , Gestão da Segurança/economia , Suécia , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências/legislação & jurisprudência , Jurisprudência , Ciência , Análise Custo-Benefício , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/legislação & jurisprudência , Responsabilidade Legal , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Revisão por Pares , Política , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patient clinical and socioeconomic characteristics predict patient delay in coming to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Adult ED patients at five urban teaching hospitals were surveyed regarding self-reported delay in coming to the ED. Delay was measured by self-perception as well as by the number of days ill and unable to work. Patient socioeconomic and clinical characteristics were obtained by survey questionnaire and chart review. Cross-sectional analysis within a prospective study of 4,094 consecutive patients was performed using a subset of 1,920 patients (84% eligible rate) to whom questionnaires were administered. RESULTS: Overall, 32% of the patients completing the survey reported delay in seeking ED care. Of these patients reporting delay, 71% thought their problem would go away or was not serious. Patients who were older, had higher acuity, or were frequent ED users reported less delay in coming to the ED, while patients without a regular physician or who were African American reported more delay. Perception of increased number of days ill prior to visiting the ED was reported by frequent ED users and those with worse baseline physical function, while patients who had higher acuity reported fewer days ill prior to coming to the ED. CONCLUSIONS: A patient's decision to delay coming to the ED often reflects a belief that his or her illness is either self-limited or not serious. The decision to delay correlates with patient characteristics and access to a regular physician. The correlates of delay in seeking ED care may depend on the delay measure used. Better understanding of patients at risk for delaying care may influence interventions to reduce delay.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitais Urbanos , Humanos , Renda , Seguro Saúde , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Classe Social , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
This study characterizes health care utilization prior to death in a group of 558 homeless adults in Boston. In the year before death, 27 percent of decedents had no outpatient visits, emergency department visits, or hospitalizations except those during which death occurred. However, 21 percent of homeless decedents had a health care contact within one month of death, and 21 percent had six or more outpatient visits in the year before death. Injection drug users and persons with HIV infection were more likely to have had contact with the health care system. This study concludes that homeless persons may be underusing health care services even when they are at high risk of death. Because a subset of homeless persons had extensive health care contacts prior to death, opportunities to prevent deaths may have been missed, and some deaths may not have been preventable through medical intervention.
Assuntos
Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas Mal Alojadas/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Boston/epidemiologia , Causas de Morte , Coleta de Dados , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/mortalidade , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Pessoas Mal Alojadas/classificação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: We examined whether physician factors, particularly financial productivity incentives, affect the provision of preventive care. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We surveyed and reviewed the charts of 4,473 patients who saw 1 of 169 internists from 11 academically affiliated primary care practices in Boston. We abstracted cancer risk factors, comorbid conditions, and the dates of the last Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, mammogram, cholesterol screening, and influenza vaccination. We obtained physician information including the method of financial compensation through a mailed physician survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between physician factors and four outcomes based on Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures: (1) Pap smear within the prior 3 years among women 20 to 75 years old; (2) mammogram in the prior 2 years among women 52 to 69 years old; (3) cholesterol screening within the prior 5 years among patients 40 to 64 years old; and (4) influenza vaccination among patients 65 years old and older. All analyses accounted for clus-tering by provider and site and were converted into adjusted rates. RESULTS: After adjustment for practice site, clinical, and physician factors, patients cared for by physicians with financial productivity incentives were significantly less likely than those cared for by physicians without this incentive to receive Pap smears (rate difference, 12%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5% to 18%) and cholesterol screening (rate difference, 4%; 95% CI: 0% to 8%). Financial incentives were not significantly associated with rates of mammography (rate difference, -3%; 95% CI: -15% to 10%) or influenza vaccination (rate difference, -13%; 95% CI: -28% to 2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that some financial productivity incentives may discourage the performance of certain forms of preventive care, specifically Pap smears and cholesterol screening. More studies are needed to examine the effects of financial incentives on the quality of care, and to examine whether quality improvement interventions or incentives based on quality improve the performance of preventive care.
Assuntos
Eficiência , Medicina Interna/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/economia , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevenção Primária/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo , Adulto , Idoso , Boston , Colesterol/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Mamografia/economia , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Teste de Papanicolaou , Esfregaço Vaginal/economia , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
West Nile virus (WNV) can cause large outbreaks of febrile illness and severe neurologic disease. This study estimates the seroprevalence of WNV infection and assesses risk perception and practices regarding potential exposures to mosquitoes of persons in an area with intense epizootics in 1999 and 2000. A serosurvey of persons aged > or = 12 years was conducted in southwestern Connecticut during October 10-15, 2000, using household-based stratified cluster sampling. Participants completed a questionnaire regarding concern for and personal measures taken with respect to WNV and provided a blood sample for WNV testing. Seven hundred thirty persons from 645 households participated. No person tested positive for WNV (95% CI: 0-0.5%). Overall, 44% of persons used mosquito repellent, 56% practiced > or = two personal precautions to avoid mosquitoes, and 61% of households did > or = two mosquito-source reduction activities. In multivariate analyses, using mosquito repellent was associated with age < 50 years, using English as the primary language in the home, being worried about WNV, being a little worried about pesticides, and finding mosquitoes frequently in the home (P<0.05). Females (OR = 2.0; CI = 1.2-2.9) and persons very worried about WNV (OR = 3.8; CI = 2.2-6.5) were more likely to practice > or = two personal precautions. Taking > or = two mosquito source reductions was associated with persons with English as the primary language (OR = 2.0; CI = 1.1-3.5) and finding a dead bird on the property (OR = 1.8; CI = 1.1-2.8). An intense epizootic can occur in an area without having a high risk for infection to humans. A better understanding of why certain people do not take personal protective measures, especially among those aged > or = 50 years and those whose primary language is not English, might be needed if educational campaigns are to prevent future WNV outbreaks.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/epidemiologia , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Criança , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Culicidae , Feminino , Humanos , Mordeduras e Picadas de Insetos/prevenção & controle , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Febre do Nilo Ocidental/sangue , Vírus do Nilo Ocidental/isolamento & purificaçãoAssuntos
Responsabilidade Legal , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Employee Retirement Income Security Act , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Responsabilidade Legal/economia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/economia , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/organização & administração , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To better understand the differences between two iatrogenic injury studies of hospitalized patients in 1992 which used ostensibly similar methods and similar sample sizes, but had quite different findings. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study (QAHCS) reported that 16.6% of admissions were associated with adverse events (AE), whereas the Utah, Colorado Study (UTCOS) reported a rate of 2.9%. SETTING: Hospitalized patients in Australia and the USA. DESIGN: Investigators from both studies compared methods and characteristics and identified differences. QAHCS data were then analysed using UTCOS methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between the studies and the comparative AE rates when these had been accounted for. RESULTS: Both studies used a two-stage chart review process (screening nurse review followed by confirmatory physician review) to detect AEs; five important methodological differences were found: (i) QAHCS nurse reviewers referred records that documented any link to a previous admission, whereas UTCOS imposed age-related time constraints; (ii) QAHCS used a lower confidence threshold for defining medical causation; (iii) QAHCS used two physician reviewers, whereas UTCOS used one; (iv) QAHCS counted all AEs associated with an index admission whereas UTCOS counted only those determining the annual incidence; and (v) QAHCS included some types of events not included in UTCOS. When the QAHCS data were analysed using UTCOS methods, the comparative rates became 10.6% and 3.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Five methodological differences accounted for some of the discrepancy between the two studies. Two explanations for the remaining three-fold disparity are that quality of care was worse in Australia and that medical record content and/or reviewer behaviour was different.
Assuntos
Benchmarking/métodos , Hospitais/normas , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Benchmarking/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Hospitais/classificação , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Auditoria Médica/métodos , Prontuários Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To better understand the remaining three-fold disparity between adverse event (AE) rates in the Quality in Australia Health Care Study (QAHCS) and the Utah-Colorado Study (UTCOS) after methodological differences had been accounted for. SETTING: Iatrogenic injury in hospitalized patients in Australia and America. DESIGN: Using a previously developed classification, all AEs were assigned to 98 exclusive descriptive categories and the relative rates compared between studies; they were also compared with respect to severity and death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The distribution of AEs amongst the descriptive and outcome categories. RESULTS: For 38 categories, representing 67% of UTCOS and 28% of QAHCS AEs, there were no statistically significant differences. For 33, representing 31% and 69% respectively, there was seven times more AEs in QAHCS than in UTCOS. Rates for major disability and death were very similar (1.7% and 0.3% of admissions for both studies) but the minor disability rate was six times greater in QAHCS (8.4% versus 1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: A similar 2% core of serious AEs was found in both studies, but for the remaining categories six to seven times more AEs were reported in QAHCS than in UTCOS. We hypothesize that this disparity is due to different thresholds for admission and discharge and to a greater degree of under-reporting of certain types of problems as AEs by UTCOS than QAHCS reviewers. The biases identified were consistent with, and appropriate for, the quite different aims of each study. No definitive difference in quality of care was identified by these analyses or a literature review.
Assuntos
Benchmarking/métodos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Hospitais/normas , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Auditoria Médica/métodos , Erros Médicos/classificação , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália/epidemiologia , Benchmarking/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/classificação , Feminino , Hospitais/classificação , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Global risk capitation as a preferred payment method in heavily penetrated managed care markets poses important challenges for women's health care tertiary referral centers that employ participating primary care physicians. Global risk capitation agreements expose those centers to the adverse financial effects of high frequency of obstetric visits, costly infertility and neonatal care, and care of a disproportionate number of patients with complex, resource-intensive conditions.
Assuntos
Capitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/economia , Seleção de Pacientes , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Serviços de Saúde da Mulher/economia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Risco Ajustado , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Patients facing catastrophic illness often desire choice when selecting specialist physicians and will sometimes request specialists at academic medical centers (AMCs). Under capitated payment systems, community primary care physician (PCP) gatekeepers have an incentive to refer patients to local specialists with whom they regularly collaborate rather than to AMC specialists, who generally are more expensive and with whom they may not have working relationships. As a result of the financial pressures of capitation and the desire to work with familiar specialists, some PCPs in community-based risk-sharing groups are reluctant to refer sick patients in capitated health plans to AMC-affiliated specialists. Forced to choose between their existing primary care relationships and their desired specialists, some patients are terminating their existing primary care relationships to enroll with PCPs affiliated with the AMCs to which they wish to be referred. The authors' observations at their AMC indicate that most of the patients leaving their PCPs in the community do so to gain access to oncology and surgical specialty services. The shifting of sick patients in capitated health plans to AMC-affiliated PCPs creates a financial burden for both AMCs and their affiliated physicians. Health plans and AMCs must cooperate in developing a solution; for example, risk-adjust each risk unit's capitation payment based on the health status and disease burden of its population. The authors propose strategies aimed at enabling patients to have access to AMC tertiary care services while ensuring that the cost of caring for the sickest patients is not borne solely by AMC risk groups. They conclude that it is in the best interests of all concerned to modify the current counterproductive incentives that promote the problems they have described.
Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/economia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Capitação , Doença Catastrófica/economia , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/economia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Controle de Acesso , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Participação do Paciente , Risco Ajustado , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Florida's Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (NICA) is the most significant experiment with compensation for medical injury yet undertaken in the United States. As NICA enters its second decade of operation, maintaining the scheme's jurisdictional integrity has emerged as a key challenge for policy makers in Florida. We explore the relationship that has emerged between NICA and the tort system as competing avenues for families to obtain compensation for severe birth-related neurological injury. By linking NICA claims data with data on malpractice claims filed in Florida, we found a lively persistence of "bad baby" litigation despite NICA's implementation. Many families pursued claims in both fora. An explanation for these results can be traced to key features of the plan's design--primarily, the way in which "exclusive" jurisdiction over injuries is determined and the restrictive nature of the compensation criteria used. Our findings may help efforts to consolidate NICA's role in injury compensation and inform future design of alternative compensation systems.